FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Book of Mormon/Geography/Statements/Nineteenth century/Joseph Smith's lifetime 1829-1840/Joseph Smith/Zelph"
< Book of Mormon | Geography | Statements | Nineteenth century | Joseph Smith's lifetime 1829-1840 | Joseph Smith
m |
m |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| valign="top"|Artifacts||Body, arrow ||Human bones, a skeleton, arrow||Human bones||Human bones, arrow||Human bones, arrow||Skeleton of man, arrow | | valign="top"|Artifacts||Body, arrow ||Human bones, a skeleton, arrow||Human bones||Human bones, arrow||Human bones, arrow||Skeleton of man, arrow | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | valign="top"|Person?|| Zalph, large thick-set man,<br> warrior, killed in battle ||Zalph, warrior, killed in battle|| | + | | valign="top"|Person?|| Zalph, large thick-set man,<br> warrior, killed in battle ||Zalph, warrior, killed in battle||--||Zalph, warrior, white Lamanite||Mighty prophet, killed in battle||Zalph, warrior, white Lamanite,<br>man of God, killed in battle |
|- | |- | ||
| valign="top"|Nephite/<br>Lamanite?|| Nephite and Lamanite ||Lamanite||--||Lamanite||--||Lamanite | | valign="top"|Nephite/<br>Lamanite?|| Nephite and Lamanite ||Lamanite||--||Lamanite||--||Lamanite | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | William Hamblin described some of the difficulties | + | |
| + | William Hamblin described some of the difficulties in identifying the roots of this story: | ||
:many significant qualifiers were left out of the printed version [of this account]. Thus, whereas Wilford Woodruff's journal account mentions that the ruins and bones were "probably [related to] the Nephites and Lamanites," the printed version left out the "probably," and implied that it was a certainty. [There are] several similar shifts in meaning from the original manuscripts to the printed version. "The mere 'arrow' of the three earliest accounts became an 'Indian Arrow' (as in Kimball), and finally a 'Lamanitish Arrow.' The phrase 'known from the Atlantic to the Rocky Mountain,' as in the McBride diary, became 'known from the Hill Cumorah' (stricken out) or 'eastern sea to the Rocky Mountains.' " The point here is that there are many difficulties that make it nearly impossible for us to know exactly what Joseph Smith said in 1834 as he reflected on the ruins his group encountered in Illinois.{{ref|hamblin1}} | :many significant qualifiers were left out of the printed version [of this account]. Thus, whereas Wilford Woodruff's journal account mentions that the ruins and bones were "probably [related to] the Nephites and Lamanites," the printed version left out the "probably," and implied that it was a certainty. [There are] several similar shifts in meaning from the original manuscripts to the printed version. "The mere 'arrow' of the three earliest accounts became an 'Indian Arrow' (as in Kimball), and finally a 'Lamanitish Arrow.' The phrase 'known from the Atlantic to the Rocky Mountain,' as in the McBride diary, became 'known from the Hill Cumorah' (stricken out) or 'eastern sea to the Rocky Mountains.' " The point here is that there are many difficulties that make it nearly impossible for us to know exactly what Joseph Smith said in 1834 as he reflected on the ruins his group encountered in Illinois.{{ref|hamblin1}} | ||
LDS scholars have differed about the reliability of the accounts, and their relevance for Book of Mormon geography.{{ref|procon1}} | LDS scholars have differed about the reliability of the accounts, and their relevance for Book of Mormon geography.{{ref|procon1}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
==Endnotes== | ==Endnotes== | ||
| Line 49: | Line 52: | ||
#{{note|cannon1}} Data as summarized by {{RegionalStudiesIllinois|author=Donald Q. Cannon|article=Zelph Revisited|start=57|end=109}} {{GL1|url=http://gospelink.com/library/doc?book_doc_id=273574}} | #{{note|cannon1}} Data as summarized by {{RegionalStudiesIllinois|author=Donald Q. Cannon|article=Zelph Revisited|start=57|end=109}} {{GL1|url=http://gospelink.com/library/doc?book_doc_id=273574}} | ||
#{{note|hamblin1}} {{JBMS-2-1-11}} | #{{note|hamblin1}} {{JBMS-2-1-11}} | ||
| − | #{{note| | + | #{{note|procon1}} Kenneth Godfrey's articles have cast doubt on the reliability of the key elements of the story as we have them. Donald Q. Cannon has argued for the basic reliability of the accounts. See the articles by each author for both perspectives. |
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
Revision as of 22:47, 29 August 2007
| Answers portal |
| Book of Mormon Geography |
|
 RESOURCES
|
|---|
|
Geography: DNA: Archaeology: Lamanites in North America: Other: |
 PERSPECTIVES
|
 MEDIA
|
| OTHER PORTALS
|
This page is based on an answer to a question submitted to the FAIR web site, or a frequently asked question.
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
Contents
Question
Joseph Smith reportedly found the bones of an individual named "Zelph," during the Zion's camp march. Does this have implications for Book of Mormon geography?
Answer
The most common version of this story is found in the History of the Church.[1] It should be noted, however, that the History of the Church version was created by amalgamating the journal entries of several people:
- Wilford Woodruff (WW),
- Heber C. Kimball (HCK),
- George A. Smith (GAS),
- Levi Hancock (LH),
- Moses Martin (MM),
- Reuben McBride (RM).[2]
A comparison of the various accounts is instructive:[3]
| Aspect | WW | HCK | GAS | LH | MM | RM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | May-June 1834 | JS on 3 June 1834 | Group on 2 June 1834 | -- | -- | JS on 3 June 1834 |
| Place | Illinois River | Illinois River | -- | Illinois River | Pike County | -- |
| Description | -300 ft above river -Flung up by ancients |
-Several 100 feet above -3 altars on mound |
300 ft above river | Big mound | -many mounds -fortifications |
-- |
| Artifacts | Body, arrow | Human bones, a skeleton, arrow | Human bones | Human bones, arrow | Human bones, arrow | Skeleton of man, arrow |
| Person? | Zalph, large thick-set man, warrior, killed in battle |
Zalph, warrior, killed in battle | -- | Zalph, warrior, white Lamanite | Mighty prophet, killed in battle | Zalph, warrior, white Lamanite, man of God, killed in battle |
| Nephite/ Lamanite? |
Nephite and Lamanite | Lamanite | -- | Lamanite | -- | Lamanite |
| JS Vision? | Vision: Onandangus, great prophet Known Atlantic to Rockies |
-- | -- | Onandangus | -- | Onandangus, Known Atlantic to Rockies |
William Hamblin described some of the difficulties in identifying the roots of this story:
- many significant qualifiers were left out of the printed version [of this account]. Thus, whereas Wilford Woodruff's journal account mentions that the ruins and bones were "probably [related to] the Nephites and Lamanites," the printed version left out the "probably," and implied that it was a certainty. [There are] several similar shifts in meaning from the original manuscripts to the printed version. "The mere 'arrow' of the three earliest accounts became an 'Indian Arrow' (as in Kimball), and finally a 'Lamanitish Arrow.' The phrase 'known from the Atlantic to the Rocky Mountain,' as in the McBride diary, became 'known from the Hill Cumorah' (stricken out) or 'eastern sea to the Rocky Mountains.' " The point here is that there are many difficulties that make it nearly impossible for us to know exactly what Joseph Smith said in 1834 as he reflected on the ruins his group encountered in Illinois.[4]
LDS scholars have differed about the reliability of the accounts, and their relevance for Book of Mormon geography.[5]
Endnotes
- [note] Joseph Smith, History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 7 volumes, edited by Brigham H. Roberts, (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1957), 2:79–80. Volume 2 link
- [note] Kenneth W. Godfrey, "The Zelph Story," Brigham Young University Studies 29 no. 2 (1989), 31–56.off-site GL direct link
- [note] Data as summarized by Donald Q. Cannon, "Zelph Revisited," in Regional Studies in the Latter-day Saint Church History: Illinois, edited by H. Dean Garret (Provo, Utah: Department of Church History and Doctrine, Brigham Young University, 1995), 57–109. GospeLink GL direct link
- [note] William J. Hamblin, "Basic Methodological Problems with the Anti-Mormon Approach to the Geography and Archaeology of the Book of Mormon," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 2/1. (1993). [161–197] link
- [note] Kenneth Godfrey's articles have cast doubt on the reliability of the key elements of the story as we have them. Donald Q. Cannon has argued for the basic reliability of the accounts. See the articles by each author for both perspectives.
Further reading
FAIR wiki articles
FAIR web site
- FairMormon Topical Guide: Zelph FairMormon link
External links
- Kenneth W. Godfrey, "What is the Significance of Zelph In The Study Of Book of Mormon Geography?," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 8/2 (1999). [70–79] link
- Kenneth W. Godfrey, "The Zelph Story," Brigham Young University Studies 29 no. 2 (1989), 31–56.off-site GL direct link
Printed material
- Donald Q. Cannon, "Zelph Revisited," in Regional Studies in the Latter-day Saint Church History: Illinois, edited by H. Dean Garret (Provo, Utah: Department of Church History and Doctrine, Brigham Young University, 1995), 57–109. GospeLink GL direct link