Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Chapter 7"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-== ==\n +))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{IndexClaim\n\|claim=\n\*(.*)\n\|response=\n +{{IndexClaimItemShort\n|title={{check}}\n|claim=\1\n}}\n))
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
====416====
 
====416====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*{{AuthorQuote|"…the 1846 temple sealings, which re-comemorated previously conducted plural marriages, were carefully noted in Nauvoo temple records."}}
+
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"…the 1846 temple sealings, which re-comemorated previously conducted plural marriages, were carefully noted in Nauvoo temple records."}}
|response=
+
}}
 
*The Church has allowed these records to be seen by researchers and even published by Signature Books. <ref>Lisle G. Brown, ''Nauvoo Sealings, Adoptions, and Anointings : A Comprehensive Register of Persons Receiving LDS Temple Ordinances'' 1841-1846 (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 2006).</ref> This seems a strange course of action for an organization determined (as the author repeatedly insists) to "expurgating" the history of plural marriage.
 
*The Church has allowed these records to be seen by researchers and even published by Signature Books. <ref>Lisle G. Brown, ''Nauvoo Sealings, Adoptions, and Anointings : A Comprehensive Register of Persons Receiving LDS Temple Ordinances'' 1841-1846 (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 2006).</ref> This seems a strange course of action for an organization determined (as the author repeatedly insists) to "expurgating" the history of plural marriage.
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision]]
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision]]
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
====423====
 
====423====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*In Nauvoo, Joseph is claimed to have "appropriated church members' charitable donations for real estate speculation, buying low and selling high to those immigrants who could afford to pay."
+
|claim=In Nauvoo, Joseph is claimed to have "appropriated church members' charitable donations for real estate speculation, buying low and selling high to those immigrants who could afford to pay."
|response=
+
}}
 
*Joseph had, in fact, signed a note for the land—thus going into debt himself. He sold land at variable prices, charging those who could afford more money so that he could give free or cheap land to the poor.
 
*Joseph had, in fact, signed a note for the land—thus going into debt himself. He sold land at variable prices, charging those who could afford more money so that he could give free or cheap land to the poor.
 
*This is not land speculation.
 
*This is not land speculation.
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
====429====
 
====429====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*{{AuthorQuote|"A friend of Nancy Rigdon, Francis had become concerned in 1842 over Smith's advances toward her."}}
+
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"A friend of Nancy Rigdon, Francis had become concerned in 1842 over Smith's advances toward her."}}
|response=
+
}}
 
*The author fails to tell us that Francis was, in fact, Nancy's boyfriend and her suitor.  He also neglects to mention that Francis had contracted a venereal disease from a prostitute, had been seducing women under John C. Bennett's tutelage, and may have engaged in a homosexual relationship with Bennett.
 
*The author fails to tell us that Francis was, in fact, Nancy's boyfriend and her suitor.  He also neglects to mention that Francis had contracted a venereal disease from a prostitute, had been seducing women under John C. Bennett's tutelage, and may have engaged in a homosexual relationship with Bennett.
 
*[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]]
 
*[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]]
Line 51: Line 51:
  
 
====435====
 
====435====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*The author claims that Dallin H. Oaks' assertation that the "abatement of newspapers publishing scandalous or provocative material" was not considered a violation of freedom of the press at the time draws "no distinction between the destruction of a newspaper without a trial and a libel charge being tried in the courts."
+
|claim=The author claims that Dallin H. Oaks' assertation that the "abatement of newspapers publishing scandalous or provocative material" was not considered a violation of freedom of the press at the time draws "no distinction between the destruction of a newspaper without a trial and a libel charge being tried in the courts."
|response=
+
}}
 
*The author's "reply" to Dallin Oaks is a ''[[Logical_fallacies#Non_sequitur|non sequitur]]''.  Oaks (and Firmage and Mangrum) demonstrate at length that both Illinois and U.S. law had ample precedent in case law and practice for the abatement of the ''Expositor''.  
 
*The author's "reply" to Dallin Oaks is a ''[[Logical_fallacies#Non_sequitur|non sequitur]]''.  Oaks (and Firmage and Mangrum) demonstrate at length that both Illinois and U.S. law had ample precedent in case law and practice for the abatement of the ''Expositor''.  
 
*If the author wishes to dispute the legal scholarship marshaled by Oaks' 40 page review, it deserves more than a dismissive footnote, and he ought to interact with Oaks' article, not a brief summary in a secondary source. <ref>Dallin H. Oaks, "The Suppression of the Nauvoo Expositor," ''Utah Law Review'' 9 (1965): 862–903.</ref>  
 
*If the author wishes to dispute the legal scholarship marshaled by Oaks' 40 page review, it deserves more than a dismissive footnote, and he ought to interact with Oaks' article, not a brief summary in a secondary source. <ref>Dallin H. Oaks, "The Suppression of the Nauvoo Expositor," ''Utah Law Review'' 9 (1965): 862–903.</ref>  
Line 65: Line 65:
  
 
====438–439====
 
====438–439====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*The author follows William Law's claims about Joseph mismanaging or defrauding the Lawrence estate.
+
|claim=The author follows William Law's claims about Joseph mismanaging or defrauding the Lawrence estate.
|response=
+
}}
 
*The author completely ignores the primary documents on this issue, and relies only on Law's hostile, and demonstrably false, account.
 
*The author completely ignores the primary documents on this issue, and relies only on Law's hostile, and demonstrably false, account.
 
*[[Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Mismanagement of the Lawrence estate|Mismanagement of the Lawrence estate?]]
 
*[[Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Mismanagement of the Lawrence estate|Mismanagement of the Lawrence estate?]]
Line 78: Line 78:
  
 
====442====
 
====442====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*{{AuthorQuote|"Instead of evaluating a difficult past in order not to repeat it, the church leadership tried to separate its troubles from their apparent causes."}}
+
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"Instead of evaluating a difficult past in order not to repeat it, the church leadership tried to separate its troubles from their apparent causes."}}
|response=
+
}}
 
*[[../../Use_of_sources#.22separate_its_troubles_from_their_apparent_causes.22]]
 
*[[../../Use_of_sources#.22separate_its_troubles_from_their_apparent_causes.22]]
 
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}}
 
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}}
Line 89: Line 89:
  
 
====445====
 
====445====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*William Clayton's "discussion of plural marriage was at once turned into a charge of having had 'unlawful intercourse with women.'"
+
|claim=William Clayton's "discussion of plural marriage was at once turned into a charge of having had 'unlawful intercourse with women.'"
|response=
+
}}
 
*{{InternalContradiction|The author told us earlier only that in England Clayton "was personally suspected of ‘having had unlawful intercourse with women.’”  He said nothing about this being due only to Clayton's discussion of the matter.}}
 
*{{InternalContradiction|The author told us earlier only that in England Clayton "was personally suspected of ‘having had unlawful intercourse with women.’”  He said nothing about this being due only to Clayton's discussion of the matter.}}
 
*Even now, though, the author still does not tell us that the charge came from an “apostate Mormon,” whom Clayton claimed had maliciously distorted his words.
 
*Even now, though, the author still does not tell us that the charge came from an “apostate Mormon,” whom Clayton claimed had maliciously distorted his words.
Line 102: Line 102:
 
}}
 
}}
 
====446====
 
====446====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*The author mentions that Andrew Jenson published about plural wives, only to have Wilford Woodruff complain about him having done so. The author has continuously argued that the Church has striven to hide or suppress knowledge of polygamy.
+
|claim=The author mentions that Andrew Jenson published about plural wives, only to have Wilford Woodruff complain about him having done so. The author has continuously argued that the Church has striven to hide or suppress knowledge of polygamy.
|response=
+
}}
 
*He does not tell us that the reason Woodruff was worried was because at the time (1887) federal marshals were pursuing and jailing polygamists and their wives who refused to testify.  Woodruff was trying to keep members out of jail, not trying to suppress polygamy.
 
*He does not tell us that the reason Woodruff was worried was because at the time (1887) federal marshals were pursuing and jailing polygamists and their wives who refused to testify.  Woodruff was trying to keep members out of jail, not trying to suppress polygamy.
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision/Wilford Woodruff criticizes publication of polygamists|Wilford Woodruff criticizes publication of polygamists]]
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision/Wilford Woodruff criticizes publication of polygamists|Wilford Woodruff criticizes publication of polygamists]]
Line 114: Line 114:
  
 
====447====
 
====447====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*Joseph F. Smith wrote to Orson Pratt that a “few years ago [I] tried to get affidavits regarding Joseph Smith and ‘celestial marriage.’ . . . I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence. I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the subject as connected with the prophet Joseph himself.”
+
|claim=Joseph F. Smith wrote to Orson Pratt that a “few years ago [I] tried to get affidavits regarding Joseph Smith and ‘celestial marriage.’ . . . I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence. I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the subject as connected with the prophet Joseph himself.”
|response=
+
}}
 
*If the church had scant evidence in 1875, what evidence did those compiling the ''History of the Church'' more than twenty years earlier have? This speaks directly to Smith's complaints about the ''History of the Church''.
 
*If the church had scant evidence in 1875, what evidence did those compiling the ''History of the Church'' more than twenty years earlier have? This speaks directly to Smith's complaints about the ''History of the Church''.
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision]]
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision]]
Line 127: Line 127:
  
 
====449====
 
====449====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*The author implies that Latter-day Saints "accepted as sufficient" that Joseph Smith's death was "due to an angry mob, without caring to know specifically what those Illinois neighbors had been angry about."
+
|claim=The author implies that Latter-day Saints "accepted as sufficient" that Joseph Smith's death was "due to an angry mob, without caring to know specifically what those Illinois neighbors had been angry about."
|response=
+
}}
 
*{{HistoricalError}} The author cites five works for this claim. All five, contrary to his claim, discuss the role of plural marriage in Joseph Smith's martyrdom, as well as other facts.
 
*{{HistoricalError}} The author cites five works for this claim. All five, contrary to his claim, discuss the role of plural marriage in Joseph Smith's martyrdom, as well as other facts.
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision/LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage|LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage]]
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision/LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage|LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage]]
Line 146: Line 146:
  
 
====450====
 
====450====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*The author notes that "[o]ne LDS educator in 1967 wrote about the 'causes' of conflict in Nauvoo…without mentioning plural marriage."
+
|claim=The author notes that "[o]ne LDS educator in 1967 wrote about the 'causes' of conflict in Nauvoo…without mentioning plural marriage."
|response=
+
}}
 
*{{HistoricalError}} Contrary to the author's claim, Godfrey's cited chapter is entitled "plural marriage," and he discusses it at length there and in his abstract and conclusion.
 
*{{HistoricalError}} Contrary to the author's claim, Godfrey's cited chapter is entitled "plural marriage," and he discusses it at length there and in his abstract and conclusion.
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision/LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage|LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage#Godfrey]]
 
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision/LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage|LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage#Godfrey]]
Line 161: Line 161:
  
 
====450 n. 106====
 
====450 n. 106====
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|claim=
+
|title={{check}}
*The author cites the paper as "Causes of Non-Mormon Conflict…."
+
|claim=The author cites the paper as "Causes of Non-Mormon Conflict…."
|response=
+
}}
 
*Correct title is: "Causes of '''Mormon''' Non-Mormon Conflict…" {{ea}}
 
*Correct title is: "Causes of '''Mormon''' Non-Mormon Conflict…" {{ea}}
 
|authorsources=
 
|authorsources=

Revision as of 09:38, 30 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Response to claims made in "Chapter 7"



A FAIR Analysis of: Nauvoo Polygamy: "... but we called it celestial marriage", a work by author: George D. Smith

416

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

 Author's quote: "…the 1846 temple sealings, which re-comemorated previously conducted plural marriages, were carefully noted in Nauvoo temple records."

FAIR's Response

|authorsources=

  • No source given.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

}}

423

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

In Nauvoo, Joseph is claimed to have "appropriated church members' charitable donations for real estate speculation, buying low and selling high to those immigrants who could afford to pay."

FAIR's Response

  • Joseph had, in fact, signed a note for the land—thus going into debt himself. He sold land at variable prices, charging those who could afford more money so that he could give free or cheap land to the poor.
  • This is not land speculation.
  • Joseph Smith/Land speculation in Nauvoo
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)

|authorsources=

  • No source provided.

}}

429

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

 Author's quote: "A friend of Nancy Rigdon, Francis had become concerned in 1842 over Smith's advances toward her."

FAIR's Response

  • The author fails to tell us that Francis was, in fact, Nancy's boyfriend and her suitor. He also neglects to mention that Francis had contracted a venereal disease from a prostitute, had been seducing women under John C. Bennett's tutelage, and may have engaged in a homosexual relationship with Bennett.
  • John C. Bennett

|authorsources=

  • No source provided.

John C. Bennett (edit)

}}

435

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

The author claims that Dallin H. Oaks' assertation that the "abatement of newspapers publishing scandalous or provocative material" was not considered a violation of freedom of the press at the time draws "no distinction between the destruction of a newspaper without a trial and a libel charge being tried in the courts."

FAIR's Response

  • The author's "reply" to Dallin Oaks is a non sequitur. Oaks (and Firmage and Mangrum) demonstrate at length that both Illinois and U.S. law had ample precedent in case law and practice for the abatement of the Expositor.
  • If the author wishes to dispute the legal scholarship marshaled by Oaks' 40 page review, it deserves more than a dismissive footnote, and he ought to interact with Oaks' article, not a brief summary in a secondary source. [2]
  • Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Presentism#.22Freedom_of_the_press.22
  • Nauvoo Expositor

|authorsources=

  • Edwin Brown Firmage and Richard Collin Mangrum, Zion in the Courts : a Legal History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1830–1900 (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988), 112-13, 390n13 (Citing Oaks). ISBN 0252069803.

Nauvoo Expositor (edit)

  • See also ch. Preface: xii
  • See also ch. 4: 285
  • See also ch. 6: 408
  • See also ch. 7: 435

}}

438–439

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

The author follows William Law's claims about Joseph mismanaging or defrauding the Lawrence estate.

FAIR's Response

  • The author completely ignores the primary documents on this issue, and relies only on Law's hostile, and demonstrably false, account.
  • Mismanagement of the Lawrence estate?
  • See also ch. 3: 196
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)

|authorsources=

  • Cook, William Law, 120.

}}

442

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

 Author's quote: "Instead of evaluating a difficult past in order not to repeat it, the church leadership tried to separate its troubles from their apparent causes."

FAIR's Response

|authorsources=

  • No source provided.

}}

445

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

William Clayton's "discussion of plural marriage was at once turned into a charge of having had 'unlawful intercourse with women.'"

FAIR's Response

  •  Internal contradiction: The author told us earlier only that in England Clayton "was personally suspected of ‘having had unlawful intercourse with women.’” He said nothing about this being due only to Clayton's discussion of the matter.
  • Even now, though, the author still does not tell us that the charge came from an “apostate Mormon,” whom Clayton claimed had maliciously distorted his words.
  • Polygamy/William Clayton
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)

|authorsources=

  • Smith, Intimate Chronicle, xlix-l.

William Clayton (edit)

}}

446

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

The author mentions that Andrew Jenson published about plural wives, only to have Wilford Woodruff complain about him having done so. The author has continuously argued that the Church has striven to hide or suppress knowledge of polygamy.

FAIR's Response

  • He does not tell us that the reason Woodruff was worried was because at the time (1887) federal marshals were pursuing and jailing polygamists and their wives who refused to testify. Woodruff was trying to keep members out of jail, not trying to suppress polygamy.
  • Wilford Woodruff criticizes publication of polygamists
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)

|authorsources=

  • Richard S. Van Wagoner, Mormon Polygamy: A History (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1989), 135.

}}

447

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

Joseph F. Smith wrote to Orson Pratt that a “few years ago [I] tried to get affidavits regarding Joseph Smith and ‘celestial marriage.’ . . . I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence. I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the subject as connected with the prophet Joseph himself.”

FAIR's Response

|authorsources=

  • Joseph F. Smith to Orson Pratt Sr., 19 July 1875, Joseph F. Smith Letterbooks, Ms d 1325, Joseph F. Smith Collection, Church History Library and Archives.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

}}

449

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

The author implies that Latter-day Saints "accepted as sufficient" that Joseph Smith's death was "due to an angry mob, without caring to know specifically what those Illinois neighbors had been angry about."

FAIR's Response

|authorsources=

  • The author lists these works but does not give page numbers.
  1. Brigham H. Roberts, A Comprehensive History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Provo, UT: BYU Press, 1965).
  2. Joseph Fielding Smith, Essentials in Church History: A History of the Church from the Birth of Joseph Smith to the Present Time (1922), with Introductory Chapters on the Antiquity of the Gospel and The “Falling Away” (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1922).
  3. William E. Berrett, The Restored Church: A Brief History of the Origin, Growth and Doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Salt Lake City: Department of Education of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Deseret Book, 1958).
  4. Orson F. Whitney, Life of Heber C. Kimball, An Apostle; The Father and Founder of the British Mission (Salt Lake City: Kimball family, 1888).
  5. Leonard J. Arrington and Davis Bitton, The Mormon Experience: A History of the Latter-Day Saints, 2nd ed. (New York: Knopf, 1992).

Censorship of Church History (edit)

}}

450

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

The author notes that "[o]ne LDS educator in 1967 wrote about the 'causes' of conflict in Nauvoo…without mentioning plural marriage."

FAIR's Response

  •  History unclear or in error Contrary to the author's claim, Godfrey's cited chapter is entitled "plural marriage," and he discusses it at length there and in his abstract and conclusion.
  • LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage#Godfrey
  • Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Censorship
  • Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review)
  •  The author or publisher responds: The publisher acknowledged that the author "might have been more precise" in his statement, and indicated that the author meant that Latter-day Saints "have yet to acknowledge" that polygamy was a "main cause" leading to Joseph Smith's death. off-site

|authorsources=

  • Kenneth W. Godfrey, “Causes of [Mormon sic] Non-Mormon Conflict in Hancock County, Illinois, 1839–1846” (PhD diss., Brigham Young University, 1967), chap 7.

Censorship of Church History (edit)

}}

450 n. 106

The author(s) of Check link or content make(s) the following claim:

The author cites the paper as "Causes of Non-Mormon Conflict…."

FAIR's Response

  • Correct title is: "Causes of Mormon Non-Mormon Conflict…" (emphasis added)

|authorsources=

  •  Citation error
  • See left

}}


Notes


  1. Lisle G. Brown, Nauvoo Sealings, Adoptions, and Anointings : A Comprehensive Register of Persons Receiving LDS Temple Ordinances 1841-1846 (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 2006).
  2. Dallin H. Oaks, "The Suppression of the Nauvoo Expositor," Utah Law Review 9 (1965): 862–903.