FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Plural marriage/Polygamy in the 19th Century"
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
|summary= | |summary= | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
===== ===== | ===== ===== |
Revision as of 17:37, 21 May 2017
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Contents
- 1 Polygamy in the 19th Century
- 1.1 Jump to Subtopic:
- 1.2 19th century statements from Church leaders regarding the practice of plural marriage
- 1.3 Early Church leaders' comments about the difficulties of plural marriage
- 1.4 Reports that the Lamanites were to become "white and delightsome" through polygamous marriage
- 1.5 The Law of Adoption: The sealing of men and women as children to prominent Latter-day Saint leaders
Polygamy in the 19th Century
Jump to Subtopic:
- 19th century statements from Church leaders regarding the practice of plural marriage
- Divorce among Mormons in the 19th century
- Reports that the Lamanites were to become "white and delightsome" through polygamous marriage
- Polygamy practiced after the Manifesto
- The purpose of plural marriage
- Did Lorenzo Snow's statements about polygamy during the Temple Lot case
19th century statements from Church leaders regarding the practice of plural marriage
Jump to details:
- Question: Did some Church leaders teach that plural marriage was a practice that would persist forever?
- Question: Was Heber C. Kimball concerned that missionaries would "take all the best" convert women as plural wives before they returned to Salt Lake City?
Early Church leaders' comments about the difficulties of plural marriage
Summary: It is claimed that early Church leaders "admitted" that there were many difficulties with plural marriage that caused "problems" and "great sorrow."
Jump to details:
- Gospel Topics: "It is therefore difficult to accurately generalize about the experience of all plural marriages"
- Question: Did early Church leaders "admit" that there were many difficulties with plural marriage that caused "problems" and "great sorrow"?
Divine manifestations to plural wives, their families, and other members
Summary: Did those who entered into plural marriage do so simply because Joseph Smith (or another Church leader) "told them to"? Is this an example of "blind obedience"? No, they bore witness that only powerful revelatory experiences convinced them that the command was from God.
Reports that the Lamanites were to become "white and delightsome" through polygamous marriage
Jump to details:
- Question: Did the Church suppress a revelation given to Joseph Smith in 1831 which encouraged the implementation of polygamy by intermarriage with the Indians in order to make them a “white and delightsome” people?
- Question: Was Ezra Booth commanded to take a wife from among the Indians?
Prevalence of in Utah
Summary: What was the prevalence of polygamy in Utah? How many wives did most polygamist males have?- REDIRECT Purpose of plural marriage
Requirement for exaltation
Summary: Some Church leaders taught that plural marriage was a requirement for those wishing to enter the highest degree of the celestial kingdom. Because the Church does not currently practice plural marriage, some claim this means that either the leaders were wrong, or that current members are not destined for exaltation.
The Law of Adoption: The sealing of men and women as children to prominent Latter-day Saint leaders
Summary: Critics point to the early practice of sealing men and women as children to prominent LDS leaders as an example of changes in LDS belief.
Jump to details:
- Question: What is the "Law of Adoption" practiced among 19-century Mormons and why has it changed?
- Question: What is the history behind the Mormon practice called the "Law of Adoption"?
- Question: Why were men sealed to other men during the early days of the Church?
- Question: Did Joseph Smith perform marriages between brothers and sisters?
Brigham Young and polygamy