Difference between revisions of "Repudiated ideas about race"

()
()
Line 23: Line 23:
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Mormonism and racial issues/Blacks and the priesthood/The "curse of Cain" and "curse of Ham"
 
|link=Mormonism and racial issues/Blacks and the priesthood/The "curse of Cain" and "curse of Ham"
|subject=The "curse of Cain" and "curse of Ham"
+
|subject=Mormonism and the "curse of Cain"
 
|summary=
 
|summary=
 
|sublink1=Gospel Topics: "Today, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is a sign of divine disfavor or curse, or that it reflects actions in a premortal life; that mixed-race marriages are a sin; or that blacks or people of any other race or ethnicity are inferior in any way to anyone else"
 
|sublink1=Gospel Topics: "Today, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is a sign of divine disfavor or curse, or that it reflects actions in a premortal life; that mixed-race marriages are a sin; or that blacks or people of any other race or ethnicity are inferior in any way to anyone else"

Revision as of 22:11, 15 April 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Repudiated early Mormon teachings regarding race


Ideas related to race that have been repudiated by the Church

Summary: There exist previously taught ideas which have been repudiated by Church leaders since the ban. Among these are the notion that Blacks were somehow not as "valiant" in the pre-existence, and that interracial marriage is forbidden.

Mormonism and the concept that some were "neutral" in the "war in heaven"

Summary: It is true that LDS scripture states that those with lighter skin color "are favored because of what they did as spirits in a pre-earth life?" Is it true that some Church leaders taught that people who were born with dark skin were "neutral" in the pre-existence?

Mormonism and the "curse of Cain"

LDS scriptures that were cited in support of the ban



Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims