Revision as of 08:24, 12 April 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (→‎) ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:24, 12 April 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:
	|sublink7=Question: What happened to Josiah Stowell? Did he conclude he had been defrauded after the court hearing?		|sublink7=Question: What happened to Josiah Stowell? Did he conclude he had been defrauded after the court hearing?
	|sublink8=Question: Was Joseph Smith found guilty of being a "con man" in 1826?		|sublink8=Question: Was Joseph Smith found guilty of being a "con man" in 1826?
−	}}
−
−	===== =====
−	{{SummaryItem
−	|link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials/1826 glasslooking trial/Con man
−	|subject=Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"?
−	|summary=Was Joseph convicted of being a "con man" in a court of law in 1826?
	}}		}}
	</onlyinclude>		</onlyinclude>

---

Revision as of 08:24, 12 April 2017

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Joseph Smith legal issues: Trials

Joseph Smith and legal trials

1826 trial for "glasslooking"

Summary: Joseph Smith was brought to trial in 1826 for "glasslooking." Didn't Hugh Nibley claim that if this trial record existed that it would be "the most damning evidence in existence against Joseph Smith?"