Difference between revisions of "The Bible/Science"

()
()
Line 11: Line 11:
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Book_of_Mormon/Archaeology/Compared_to_the_Bible
 
|link=Book_of_Mormon/Archaeology/Compared_to_the_Bible
|subject=Archaeology and the Bible
+
|subject=Biblical archaeology compared to the Book of Mormon
 
|summary=Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.
 
|summary=Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.
 
|sublink1=Question: What criticisms are raised with regard to Book of Mormon archaeology compared to that of the Bible?
 
|sublink1=Question: What criticisms are raised with regard to Book of Mormon archaeology compared to that of the Bible?
Line 23: Line 23:
 
|sublink9=Question: Did Dee F. Green say that there is no such thing as Book of Mormon archaeology?
 
|sublink9=Question: Did Dee F. Green say that there is no such thing as Book of Mormon archaeology?
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 
===== =====
 
===== =====
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem

Revision as of 20:02, 11 April 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Science and the Bible


Science and the Bible


Biblical archaeology compared to the Book of Mormon

Summary: Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.

Mormonism and the reconciliation of the Flood of Noah with scripture and Church teachings

Summary: Modern scientific knowledge regarding the diversity of species, language and evidence of continuous human habitation does not support the Biblical story that a global flood wiped out most life as recently as 4,400 years ago
  1. REDIRECTThe Creation