Difference between revisions of "The Bible/Science"

Line 8: Line 8:
 
|summary=
 
|summary=
 
}}
 
}}
 +
===== =====
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Book_of_Mormon/Archaeology/Compared_to_the_Bible
 
|link=Book_of_Mormon/Archaeology/Compared_to_the_Bible
 
|subject=Archaeology and the Bible
 
|subject=Archaeology and the Bible
 
|summary=Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.
 
|summary=Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.
 +
|sublink1=Question: What criticisms are raised with regard to Book of Mormon archaeology compared to that of the Bible?}
 +
|sublink2=Question: What archaeological evidence might be considered the minimal irrefutable proof needed to convince a non-believing world of the authenticity of the Nephite scripture?
 +
|sublink3=Question: How would an archaeologist distinguish a Christian's pot from that of a non-Christian?
 +
|sublink4=Question: What do we find when we turn to the records of the ancient (i.e. before A.D. 400) Americas?
 +
|sublink5=Question: How would Book of Mormon archaeology compare to that of the Bible?
 +
|sublink6=Question: What do we find in Mesoamerican archaeology with respect to place names, such as city names?
 +
|sublink7=Question: How does archaeology in the Old World compare to the first chapters in the Book of Mormon?
 +
|sublink8=Question: How does archaeology in the New World fit with the Book of Mormon?
 +
|sublink9=Question: Did Dee F. Green say that there is no such thing as Book of Mormon archaeology?
 
}}
 
}}
 +
===== =====
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Mormonism and science/Global or local Flood
 
|link=Mormonism and science/Global or local Flood
Line 18: Line 29:
 
|summary=Modern scientific knowledge regarding the diversity of species, language and evidence of continuous human habitation does not support the Biblical story that a global flood wiped out most life as recently as 4,400 years ago
 
|summary=Modern scientific knowledge regarding the diversity of species, language and evidence of continuous human habitation does not support the Biblical story that a global flood wiped out most life as recently as 4,400 years ago
 
}}
 
}}
===Creation and related issues===
 
 
{{:Mormonism_and_science/Creation_and_related_issues}}
 
{{:Mormonism_and_science/Creation_and_related_issues}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>

Revision as of 18:28, 11 April 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Science and the Bible


Science and the Bible


Archaeology and the Bible

Summary: Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.

Flood, global or local

Summary: Modern scientific knowledge regarding the diversity of species, language and evidence of continuous human habitation does not support the Biblical story that a global flood wiped out most life as recently as 4,400 years ago
  1. REDIRECTThe Creation