Revision as of 08:31, 11 April 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (→‎) ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:32, 11 April 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (→‎) Newer edit →
Line 25:		Line 25:
	|sublink1=Question: Why does Doctrine and Covenants 132 speak favorably about some Old Testament practitioners of plural marriage, while Jacob 2 is negative?		|sublink1=Question: Why does Doctrine and Covenants 132 speak favorably about some Old Testament practitioners of plural marriage, while Jacob 2 is negative?
	|sublink2=Question: Since Joseph Smith "married" the wives of 11 other men, why were those women not "destroyed" as specified in the Doctrine and Covenants since they continued to live with their "previous" husbands?		|sublink2=Question: Since Joseph Smith "married" the wives of 11 other men, why were those women not "destroyed" as specified in the Doctrine and Covenants since they continued to live with their "previous" husbands?
		+	|sublink3=Question: Under what circumstances was Doctrine and Covenants Section 132 committed to writing?
	}}		}}
	</onlyinclude>		</onlyinclude>

---

Revision as of 08:32, 11 April 2017

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Doctrine and Covenants and polygamy

The Doctrine and Covenants and polygamy

1835 Doctrine and Covenants denies polygamy—D&C 101 (original)

Summary: The 1835 edition of the D&C contained a statement of marriage which denied the practice of polygamy. Since this was published during Joseph Smith's lifetime, why might the prophet have allowed it to be published if he was actually practicing polygamy at that time?

Scriptural references to plural marriage in the Doctrine and Covenants