Difference between revisions of "Plural marriage and the law"

Line 6: Line 6:
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
 
{{:Question: Was polygamy illegal?}}
 
{{:Question: Was polygamy illegal?}}
 
+
{{:Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal/Illegal in Nauvoo}}
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal/Illegal in Nauvoo
 
|subject=Was plural marriage, as practiced by the Mormons, illegal in Nauvoo in the 1840s?
 
|summary=Under Illinois law, Joseph Smith and the Saints were not guilty of a crime due to their private practice of plural marriage. In fact, the Illinois legislature would later alter their laws precisely because they feared that their current law would allow Mormon polygamy.
 
}}
 
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>
  

Revision as of 17:08, 21 May 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Legality of polygamy

A question has many times been asked of the Church and of its individual members, to this effect: In the case of a conflict between the requirements made by the revealed word of God, and those imposed by the secular law, which of these authorities would the members of the Church be bound to obey?…Pending the overruling by Providence in favor of religious liberty, it is the duty of the saints to submit themselves to the laws of their country.

James E. Talmage, The Articles of Faith (Salt Lake City, Utah: Deseret Book Company, 1981[1899]),382–383.
∗       ∗       ∗
  1. REDIRECTPlural marriage and the law
  2. REDIRECT Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal in Nauvoo


Gregory L. Smith, M.D., "Polygamy, Prophets, and Prevarication: Frequently and Rarely Asked Questions about the Initiation, Practice, and Cessation of Plural Marriage in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints"

Gregory L. Smith, M.D.,  FairMormon Papers, (2005)
Critics charge that the Church and its members participated in polygamy in violation of both state and federal laws. It is therefore argued that the Church abandoned its commitment to “obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.”8 Critics, however, make such arguments without a full understanding of the legal considerations of the day and without understanding how civil disobedience plays into the picture.

Click here to view the complete article


Notes