Revision as of 15:53, 10 July 2016 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:45, 14 April 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Resource Title|Mormon doctrine of the past}}		{{Resource Title|Mormon doctrine of the past}}
	{{summary}}		{{summary}}
−	== ==
−	{{Topics label}}
	<onlyinclude>		<onlyinclude>
	{{SummaryHeader		{{SummaryHeader
Line 10:		Line 8:
	|summary=		|summary=
	}}		}}
		+	===== =====
	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem
	|link=Mormonism and doctrine/Statements by past prophets		|link=Mormonism and doctrine/Statements by past prophets
	|subject=Statements by past prophets		|subject=Statements by past prophets
	|summary=Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.		|summary=Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.
		+	|sublink1=Question: Did Brigham Young state that everything he said could be considered "scripture"?
		+	|sublink2=Question: When are the writings or sermons of Church leaders entitled to the claim of scripture?
	}}		}}
		+	===== =====
	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem
	|link=Mormonism and doctrine/Prophets are not infallible		|link=Mormonism and doctrine/Prophets are not infallible
Line 20:		Line 22:
	|summary=Are prophets considered infallible? Critics sometimes impose absolutist assumptions on the Church and hold inerrantist beliefs about scriptures or prophets. Critics therefore insist that any statement by any LDS Church leader represents LDS doctrine and is thus something that is secretly believed, or that should be believed, by Latter-day Saints.		|summary=Are prophets considered infallible? Critics sometimes impose absolutist assumptions on the Church and hold inerrantist beliefs about scriptures or prophets. Critics therefore insist that any statement by any LDS Church leader represents LDS doctrine and is thus something that is secretly believed, or that should be believed, by Latter-day Saints.
	}}		}}
		+	===== =====
	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem
	|link=Mormonism and polygamy/The Law of Adoption		|link=Mormonism and polygamy/The Law of Adoption

---

Revision as of 18:45, 14 April 2017

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Mormon doctrine of the past

Mormon doctrine of the past

Statements by past prophets

Summary: Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.

Prophets are not infallible

Summary: Are prophets considered infallible? Critics sometimes impose absolutist assumptions on the Church and hold inerrantist beliefs about scriptures or prophets. Critics therefore insist that any statement by any LDS Church leader represents LDS doctrine and is thus something that is secretly believed, or that should be believed, by Latter-day Saints.

The Law of Adoption

Summary: Critics point to the early practice of sealing men and women as children to prominent LDS leaders as an example of changes in LDS belief.