Difference between revisions of "Question: Why does "Nahom" constitute archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon?"

(These altars are located in the exact place where the spice route makes an eastward turn to cross the Arabian desert)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
Three altar inscriptions have been discovered containing the name "NHM" as a tribal name and dating from the seventh to sixth centuries BC. This is roughly the time period when Lehi’s family was traveling though the same area.
 
Three altar inscriptions have been discovered containing the name "NHM" as a tribal name and dating from the seventh to sixth centuries BC. This is roughly the time period when Lehi’s family was traveling though the same area.
 +
 +
[[File:Nhm altar 1.jpg|thumb|center|500px]]
  
 
===These altars are located in the exact place where the spice route makes an eastward turn to cross the Arabian desert===
 
===These altars are located in the exact place where the spice route makes an eastward turn to cross the Arabian desert===
Line 26: Line 28:
  
 
Critics of the Church attempt to dismiss this correlation as simply "the willingness of LDS scholars to look anywhere in their despair to find a shred of validation for their erroneous beliefs." <ref>MormonThink.com page "Book of Mormon Problems".</ref> However, given the high correlation of the data, it seems that the ''critics'' are the ones that have difficulty explaining the data.
 
Critics of the Church attempt to dismiss this correlation as simply "the willingness of LDS scholars to look anywhere in their despair to find a shred of validation for their erroneous beliefs." <ref>MormonThink.com page "Book of Mormon Problems".</ref> However, given the high correlation of the data, it seems that the ''critics'' are the ones that have difficulty explaining the data.
[[File:Nhm altar 1.jpg|thumb|center|500px]]
+
 
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}

Revision as of 08:51, 22 October 2014

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Question: Why does "Nahom" constitute archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon?

Written Hebrew does not employ vowels, therefore, Book of Mormon "Nahom" is NHM in Hebrew

The Book of Mormon name "Nahom" becomes NHM when written in Hebrew. This is a significant correlation in name and location.

Three altar inscriptions have been discovered containing the name "NHM" as a tribal name and dating from the seventh to sixth centuries BC

Three altar inscriptions have been discovered containing the name "NHM" as a tribal name and dating from the seventh to sixth centuries BC. This is roughly the time period when Lehi’s family was traveling though the same area.

Nhm altar 1.jpg

These altars are located in the exact place where the spice route makes an eastward turn to cross the Arabian desert

The spice route proceed southward from Jerusalem and then turns toward the east at the place where the NHM inscriptions were found. Lehi's group proceeded southward and then made an "eastward turn" at the "place called Nahom."

Hiltonarabia1-captioned.jpg

The name NHM is associated with a burial site and mourning

Nephi indicated that their group had reached a "place called Nahom," indicating that the site was already named. Ismael was buried there, and his daughters mourned him there.

Critical responses to NHM

Critics of the Church attempt to dismiss this correlation as simply "the willingness of LDS scholars to look anywhere in their despair to find a shred of validation for their erroneous beliefs." [1] However, given the high correlation of the data, it seems that the critics are the ones that have difficulty explaining the data.


Notes

  1. MormonThink.com page "Book of Mormon Problems".