FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"?"
(Created page with "{{FME-Source |title=Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"? |category=Prophets }}...") |
(→Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"?) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
</onlyinclude> | </onlyinclude> | ||
{{endnotes sources}} | {{endnotes sources}} | ||
+ | [[Category:Letter to a CES Director]] |
Revision as of 13:11, 28 October 2014
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"?
If a doctrine that was once taught by a past prophet is rejected by a later prophet, we do not consider the earlier prophet to be a "heretic": We simply consider him to be human
Certain doctrines that applied to 19th-Century and 20th-Century Latter-day Saints were indeed later repudiated. If a doctrine that was once taught by a past prophet is rejected by a later prophet, we do not consider the earlier prophet to be a "heretic": We simply consider him to be human. For example, Brigham Young taught Adam-God and "blood atonement," yet we do not today consider Brigham to be a heretic. We simply disregard those teachings which have been repudiated. Any Latter-day Saint who attends church will be fully aware that Brigham Young is not considered to be a heretic.
Notes