Difference between revisions of "CitationAbuse:CES Letter:Stephen Burnett to Br. Johnson"

Line 1: Line 1:
==== ====
+
===The citations===
 
{{FMA
 
{{FMA
 
|title=Citation Abuse in the original ''Letter to a CES Director'': Stephen Burnett to Br. Johnson
 
|title=Citation Abuse in the original ''Letter to a CES Director'': Stephen Burnett to Br. Johnson
Line 14: Line 14:
 
– Letter from Stephen Burnett to “Br. Johnson,” April 15, 1838, in Joseph Smith Letter Book, p. 2
 
– Letter from Stephen Burnett to “Br. Johnson,” April 15, 1838, in Joseph Smith Letter Book, p. 2
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
 +
 +
===The reality===
 
The first quote is actually part of the second one, <span style="color:blue">highlighted in blue</span>:
 
The first quote is actually part of the second one, <span style="color:blue">highlighted in blue</span>:
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Line 20: Line 22:
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
*Question: Why did the author of the ''Letter to a CES Director'' feel the need to make a single hostile quote appear as if it were two quotes?
+
===Questions===
 +
*Why did the author of the ''Letter to a CES Director'' feel the need to make a single hostile quote appear as if it were two quotes?
  
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>

Revision as of 17:25, 14 September 2014

The citations

FairMormon-Answers-logo.png
PERSPECTIVES MEDIA QUESTIONS RESOURCES 2014 CONFERENCE

    Citation Abuse in the original Letter to a CES Director: Stephen Burnett to Br. Johnson


The original Letter to a CES Director presents two separate quotes attributed to Stephen Burnett:

“Never saw the plates with his natural eyes but only in vision or imagination”
– Letter from Stephen Burnett to “Br. Johnson,” April 15, 1838, in Joseph Smith Letter Book, p. 2

Three quotes later, the following quote is listed from the same source:

“…when I came to hear Martin Harris state in public that he never saw the plates with his natural eyes only in vision or imagination, neither Oliver nor David & also that the eight witnesses never saw them & hesitated to sign that instrument for that reason, but were persuaded to do it, the last pedestal gave way, in my view our foundation was sapped & the entire superstructure fell in heap of ruins, I therefore three week since in the Stone Chapel…renounced the Book of Mormon…after we were done speaking M Harris arose & said he was sorry for any man who rejected the Book of Mormon for he knew it was true, he said he had hefted the plates repeatedly in a box with only a tablecloth or a handkerchief over them, but he never saw them only as he saw a city throught [sic] a mountain. And said that he never should have told that the testimony of the eight was false, if it had not been picked out of—–—[him/me?] but should have let it passed as it was…”
– Letter from Stephen Burnett to “Br. Johnson,” April 15, 1838, in Joseph Smith Letter Book, p. 2

The reality

The first quote is actually part of the second one, highlighted in blue:

“…when I came to hear Martin Harris state in public that he never saw the plates with his natural eyes only in vision or imagination, neither Oliver nor David & also that the eight witnesses never saw them & hesitated to sign that instrument for that reason, but were persuaded to do it, the last pedestal gave way, in my view our foundation was sapped & the entire superstructure fell in heap of ruins, I therefore three week since in the Stone Chapel…renounced the Book of Mormon…after we were done speaking M Harris arose & said he was sorry for any man who rejected the Book of Mormon for he knew it was true, he said he had hefted the plates repeatedly in a box with only a tablecloth or a handkerchief over them, but he never saw them only as he saw a city throught [sic] a mountain. And said that he never should have told that the testimony of the eight was false, if it had not been picked out of—–—[him/me?] but should have let it passed as it was…”
– Letter from Stephen Burnett to “Br. Johnson,” April 15, 1838, in Joseph Smith Letter Book, p. 2

Questions

  • Why did the author of the Letter to a CES Director feel the need to make a single hostile quote appear as if it were two quotes?