Difference between revisions of "Template:Critical sources box:Resurrection/As a Priesthood Ordinance/CriticalSources"

(m)
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles Header 10}} +\n<onlyinclude>))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}}  
 +
<onlyinclude>
 
==={{Criticism source label English}}===
 
==={{Criticism source label English}}===
 
During a lecture at Calvary Chapel in Chino, California, counter-cultist Kurt Van Gorden stated that Mormon men have the option of resurrecting their wives (or not resurrecting them), implying this could be used as a bargaining chip of sorts.
 
During a lecture at Calvary Chapel in Chino, California, counter-cultist Kurt Van Gorden stated that Mormon men have the option of resurrecting their wives (or not resurrecting them), implying this could be used as a bargaining chip of sorts.

Revision as of 12:13, 2 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Source(s) of the criticism

During a lecture at Calvary Chapel in Chino, California, counter-cultist Kurt Van Gorden stated that Mormon men have the option of resurrecting their wives (or not resurrecting them), implying this could be used as a bargaining chip of sorts.

Source referenced in: Daniel C. Peterson, "Easier than Research, More Inflammatory than Truth", 2000 FAIR Conference address.