Difference between revisions of "Joseph Smith's First Vision/Multiple accounts of the First Vision"

(: m)
(: m)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
 
{{SummaryHeader
 
{{SummaryHeader
 +
|link=Joseph Smith's First Vision/Criticisms of the First Vision
 +
|subject=Criticisms of the First Vision
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Joseph Smith's First Vision/Criticisms of the First Vision/The first and second visitation of angels
 
|link=Joseph Smith's First Vision/Criticisms of the First Vision/The first and second visitation of angels
 
|subject=Joseph Smith's first and second "visitation of angels"
 
|subject=Joseph Smith's first and second "visitation of angels"
 
|summary=Joseph Smith referred to the what we now know of as the First Vision as the "first visitation of angels." He referred to Moroni's visit as "another vision of angels."
 
|summary=Joseph Smith referred to the what we now know of as the First Vision as the "first visitation of angels." He referred to Moroni's visit as "another vision of angels."
}}
 
{{SummaryHeader
 
|link=Joseph Smith's First Vision/Criticisms of the First Vision
 
|subject=Criticisms of the First Vision
 
|summary=
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem

Revision as of 21:11, 7 May 2014

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Criticisms of the First Vision

Topics


Criticisms of the First Vision


Joseph Smith's first and second "visitation of angels"

Summary: Joseph Smith referred to the what we now know of as the First Vision as the "first visitation of angels." He referred to Moroni's visit as "another vision of angels."

Discrepancies in Paul's account of his vision

Summary: Paul the apostle gave more than one account of his vision of the resurrected Lord while on the road to Damascus. Like Joseph Smith's account of the First Vision, Paul's accounts differ in some details but agree in the overall message.

Do Greek scholars solve the discrepancies in Paul's vision accounts?

Summary: The Church's sectarian critics accept Paul's account as true despite the Bible containing apparently frank contradictions in its accounts, while refusing to give Joseph Smith the same latitude. Members of the Church have long pointed out that this is a clear double standard, designed to bias the audience against Joseph from the beginning. Perhaps because of the force of this argument, some critics have begun to argue that no contradiction exists between the versions of Paul's vision.

D&C:84 says God cannot be seen without priesthood

Summary: Critics argue that Joseph Smith claimed that he saw God in 1820 and also claimed that he received the priesthood in 1829. But in a text which he produced in 1832 (DC 84꞉21-22) it is said that a person cannot see God without holding the priesthood. Therefore, it is claimed that Joseph Smith contradicted himself and this counts as evidence against his calling as an authentic prophet of God.

Was Joseph Smith told that "all the churches of the day were an abomination?"

Summary: It is claimed that Joseph Smith stated that during the First Vision that he was told that "all the churches of the day were an abomination."