Difference between revisions of "The Bible/Biblical completeness"

(m)
(: m)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
|subject="Adding to" or "taking away" from the Bible
 
|subject="Adding to" or "taking away" from the Bible
 
|summary=It is claimed that the Book of Mormon cannot be true because nothing should be "added to" or "taken away from" the Holy Bible.
 
|summary=It is claimed that the Book of Mormon cannot be true because nothing should be "added to" or "taken away from" the Holy Bible.
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Mormonism and the Bible/Inerrancy
 
|subject=Biblical inerrancy
 
|summary=Does the Bible teach that it is "inerrant"?  Is this an idea with any meaning?
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem

Revision as of 09:39, 17 April 2014

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Biblical completeness

Topics


Biblical completeness


Completeness and sufficiency

Summary: It is claimed the Bible contains all necessary or essential knowledge to assure salvation. Therefore, things like modern prophets or additional scripture (such as the Book of Mormon) are unnecessary or even blasphemous.

"Adding to" or "taking away" from the Bible

Summary: It is claimed that the Book of Mormon cannot be true because nothing should be "added to" or "taken away from" the Holy Bible.

Insufficient?

Summary: Critics interpret a statement by Orson Pratt to mean that Latter-day Saints believe that the Bible is "insufficient."

Lost scripture

Summary: I've heard about "lost scripture" mentioned in the Bible. What does the Book of Mormon mean when it says that "plain and precious" things have been taken out of the bible? What is this about, and what implications does it have for the doctrine of Biblical inerrancy and sufficiency?

Open canon vs. closed canon

Summary: It is claimed that the Church is in error because Christianity requires a "closed canon" (no more authoritative revelation) instead of the Church's "open canon" (potential for more binding revelation).