Difference between revisions of "User:InProgress/SWDN/Swedish questions/11"

m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
*Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?
 
*Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?
 
|answer=
 
|answer=
 +
*'''Question: Do contemporary accounts mention angelic visitors?<br>Answer: Yes.'''<br> {{nw}}
 +
*'''Question: Is priesthood ordination mentioned? <br> Answer: Yes.'''<br> {{nw}}
 +
*'''Question: Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?<br> Answer: Yes, there are.''' See above.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 19:57, 14 October 2013

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

A FairMormon Response to Questions Asked in Swedish Fireside with Elder's Jensen and Turley

1: BoM translation2: Polygamy and Polyandry3: Polygamy forced?4: Book of Abraham5: "Lying for Lord"6: Mark Hofmann7: Blood atonement8: First Vision9: Sanitized history10: "Not all truth is useful"11: Angelic affidavits12: Blacks and priesthood13: Temple concerns14: Evidence of Vikings15: Adam-God16: Kinderhook

∗       ∗       ∗

Question:
One thing that really bothers me is the lack of contemporary sources for the angelic visitations.
  • There are sources from 1820-1830— affidavits, letters, minutes— but none of them ever mentions any angelic visitations or a priesthood
  • Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?

Short Answer:
  • Question: Do contemporary accounts mention angelic visitors?
    Answer: Yes.

     [needs work]
  • Question: Is priesthood ordination mentioned?
    Answer: Yes.

     [needs work]
  • Question: Why are there not any contemporary testimonies. Or are there?
    Answer: Yes, there are.
    See above.