Revision as of 21:23, 15 September 2013 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (mod) ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:04, 1 December 2013 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (m) Newer edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:
	|link=Plan of salvation/Three degrees of glory/History of the belief in a three-part heaven		|link=Plan of salvation/Three degrees of glory/History of the belief in a three-part heaven
	|subject=History of the belief in a three-part heaven		|subject=History of the belief in a three-part heaven
−	|summary=Having said that, it so happens that there is an embarrassment of riches when it comes to sources contemporary with or within a few centuries of Paul, sources that showed consistently what ancient Christians and Jews believed in-enough, as it happens, to establish not just an objection to an argument from absence, but an actual consensus. And that consensus is exactly the opposite of what critics claim.	+	|summary=Having said that, it so happens that there is an embarrassment of riches when it comes to sources contemporary with or within a few centuries of Paul, sources that showed consistently what ancient Christians and Jews believed in-enough, as it happens, to establish not just an objection to an argument from absence, but an actual consensus. And that consensus is exactly the opposite of what some claim.
	}}		}}
	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem
Line 24:		Line 24:
	|link=Plan of salvation/Three degrees of glory/Not biblical		|link=Plan of salvation/Three degrees of glory/Not biblical
	|subject=Not biblical		|subject=Not biblical
−	|summary=Critics claim that the doctrine of three heavens has no basis in the Bible.	+	|summary=It is claimed that the doctrine of three heavens has no basis in the Bible.
	}}		}}
	{{SummaryItem		{{SummaryItem
Line 34:		Line 34:
	|link=Plan of salvation/Three degrees of glory/Swedenborg		|link=Plan of salvation/Three degrees of glory/Swedenborg
	|subject=Swedenborg		|subject=Swedenborg
−	|summary=Critics claim that Joseph Smith derived the idea of "three degrees of glory" in the afterlife from Emanuel Swedenborg's book, Heaven and its Wonders and Hell From Things Heard and Seen (1758).[1] Critics also claim that Joseph Smith's practice of plural marriage was similar to Swedenborg's philosophy of "spiritual wifery."	+	|summary=It is claimed that Joseph Smith derived the idea of "three degrees of glory" in the afterlife from Emanuel Swedenborg's book, Heaven and its Wonders and Hell From Things Heard and Seen (1758).[1] Critics also claim that Joseph Smith's practice of plural marriage was similar to Swedenborg's philosophy of "spiritual wifery."
	}}		}}
	</onlyinclude>		</onlyinclude>

---

Revision as of 23:04, 1 December 2013

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

The Three Degrees of Glory

Topics

Concept of Hell

History of the belief in a three-part heaven

Summary: Having said that, it so happens that there is an embarrassment of riches when it comes to sources contemporary with or within a few centuries of Paul, sources that showed consistently what ancient Christians and Jews believed in-enough, as it happens, to establish not just an objection to an argument from absence, but an actual consensus. And that consensus is exactly the opposite of what some claim.

Meaning of "telestial"

Summary: What does the word "telestial" mean, as used in Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon's vision (see DC 76:) of the post-mortal worlds?

Not biblical

Summary: It is claimed that the doctrine of three heavens has no basis in the Bible.

Progression between kingdoms

Summary: Is there progression between the three degrees of glory?

Swedenborg

Summary: It is claimed that Joseph Smith derived the idea of "three degrees of glory" in the afterlife from Emanuel Swedenborg's book, Heaven and its Wonders and Hell From Things Heard and Seen (1758).[1] Critics also claim that Joseph Smith's practice of plural marriage was similar to Swedenborg's philosophy of "spiritual wifery."