Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Websites/FutureMissionary.com/The Book of Abraham"

(mod)
(mod)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
==== ====
 
==== ====
 
{{Website response label}}
 
{{Website response label}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{FutureMissionaryIndexClaim
 +
|claim=The website states that "Joseph Smith was the only person alive who could translate Egyptian."
 +
|think=
 +
*This is incorrect. Joseph could not read Egyptian any more than he could read the characters on the plates that were used to produce the Book of Mormon. Nobody could read Egyptian at that time. What Joseph claimed was that he could translate ancient records. This he did through revelation.
 +
|quote=
 +
|link=
 +
|subject=
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{FutureMissionaryIndexClaim
 +
|claim=The website poses the question "Do Egyptologists confirm Joseph’s translation?" The answer given is that "Every Egyptologist who has inspected the facsimiles or the actual papyrus claim that it is funeral papyri."
 +
|think=
 +
*The existing fragments of papyrus contain an Egyptian funerary document. This was confirmed by the Church in the January 1968 Improvement Era. Even the LDS Egyptologists confirm that this is a funerary document.
 +
|quote=
 +
|link=
 +
|subject=
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{FutureMissionaryIndexClaim
 +
|claim=The website claims that "John Gee is the only LDS Egyptologist who confirms Joseph Smith’s translation." and that "Other LDS Egyptologists and archeologist, like Stuart Ferguson and Edward H. Ashment disagree with Gee’s findings.
 +
|think=
 +
*This is totally incorrect.
 +
*Dr. Gee, along with other LDS Egyptologists, confirm that the existing papyrus fragments are funerary documents, and that they do not contain the text of the Book of Abraham.
 +
*Thomas Stuart Ferguson was not an archaeologist, and had nothing to do with the Book of Abraham papyri in any case.
 +
*Edward H. Ashment is not an Egyptologist.
 +
|quote=
 +
|link=
 +
|subject=
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{FutureMissionaryIndexClaim
 +
|claim=
 +
|think=
 +
*
 +
|quote=
 +
|link=
 +
|subject=
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{FutureMissionaryIndexClaim
 +
|claim=
 +
|think=
 +
*
 +
|quote=
 +
|link=
 +
|subject=
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{FutureMissionaryIndexClaim
 +
|claim=
 +
|think=
 +
*
 +
|quote=
 +
|link=
 +
|subject=
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{FutureMissionaryIndexClaim
 +
|claim=
 +
|think=
 +
*
 +
|quote=
 +
|link=
 +
|subject=
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{FutureMissionaryIndexClaim
 +
|claim=
 +
|think=
 +
*
 +
|quote=
 +
|link=
 +
|subject=
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{FutureMissionaryIndexClaim
 +
|claim=
 +
|think=
 +
*
 +
|quote=
 +
|link=
 +
|subject=
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
  
 
==== ====
 
==== ====

Revision as of 17:20, 16 June 2013

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3


10 Things every Pre-missionary Should Know)
A FAIR Analysis of:
FutureMissionary.com
A work by author: Anonymous

A FAIR Analysis of FutureMissionary page "The Book of Abraham"

FAIRMORMON'S VIEW OF THE CRITICS' CONCLUSIONS


The positions that the FutureMissionary article "The Book of Abraham" appears to take are the following:

FAIRMORMON'S RESPONSE AND SUPPORTING DATA


FutureMissionary says...
The website states that "Joseph Smith was the only person alive who could translate Egyptian."


FAIR commentary

  • This is incorrect. Joseph could not read Egyptian any more than he could read the characters on the plates that were used to produce the Book of Mormon. Nobody could read Egyptian at that time. What Joseph claimed was that he could translate ancient records. This he did through revelation.




FutureMissionary says...
The website poses the question "Do Egyptologists confirm Joseph’s translation?" The answer given is that "Every Egyptologist who has inspected the facsimiles or the actual papyrus claim that it is funeral papyri."


FAIR commentary

  • The existing fragments of papyrus contain an Egyptian funerary document. This was confirmed by the Church in the January 1968 Improvement Era. Even the LDS Egyptologists confirm that this is a funerary document.




FutureMissionary says...
The website claims that "John Gee is the only LDS Egyptologist who confirms Joseph Smith’s translation." and that "Other LDS Egyptologists and archeologist, like Stuart Ferguson and Edward H. Ashment disagree with Gee’s findings.


FAIR commentary

  • This is totally incorrect.
  • Dr. Gee, along with other LDS Egyptologists, confirm that the existing papyrus fragments are funerary documents, and that they do not contain the text of the Book of Abraham.
  • Thomas Stuart Ferguson was not an archaeologist, and had nothing to do with the Book of Abraham papyri in any case.
  • Edward H. Ashment is not an Egyptologist.




FutureMissionary says...


FAIR commentary




FutureMissionary says...


FAIR commentary




FutureMissionary says...


FAIR commentary




FutureMissionary says...


FAIR commentary




FutureMissionary says...


FAIR commentary




FutureMissionary says...


FAIR commentary




FutureMissionary says...


FAIR commentary



Retrieved from "https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Mormonism/Websites/FutureMissionary.com/The_Book_of_Abraham&oldid=100741"