Difference between revisions of "User:InProgress/Website reviews/F"

(: mod)
(redirect)
 
(91 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
#REDIRECT [[Criticism of Mormonism/Websites/MormonThink/The First Vision]]
__NOTOC__
 
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
 
|title=[[../|MormonThink]]
 
|author=Anonymous
 
|noauthor=
 
|section=The First Vision
 
|previous=
 
|next=
 
|notes=
 
}}
 
==A FAIR Analysis of MormonThink page "The First Vision"==
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{Website response summary}}
 
 
 
The positions that this MormonThink article appears to take are the following:
 
*That Joseph's different accounts of the First Vision are "relatively ignored" by the Church, despite an [http://lds.org/study/topics/accounts-of-the-first-vision?lang=eng entire web page being devoted to them on lds.org] and various mentions in the ''Ensign'', including a [http://classic.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?hideNav=1&locale=0&sourceId=66a205481ae6b010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____&vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD statement by Gordon B. Hinckley].
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{Website response label}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=The First Vision wasn't even known by church members until 1842, and even then it wasn't very important.  Joseph said that he was persecuted for telling people that he had seen a vision.  There is simply no evidence that Joseph told anyone about the vision until many years later and not until after the Book of Mormon was published.  There are no accounts in the newspapers, by neighbors, preachers or even by the members of Joseph's own family.  There is much evidence to indicate that the First Vision either never really happened or was very different than we've been taught.
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=James B. Allen, who served as assistant church historian, frankly admitted that the story of the first vision "was not given general circulation in the 1830's." (Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Autumn 1966, p.33). Dr. Allen makes some startling concessions in this article. He admits, for instance, that "none of the available contemporary writings about Joseph Smith in the 1830's, none of the publications of the Church in that decade, and no contemporary journal or correspondence yet discovered mentions the story of the first vision...." Dr. Allen goes on to state that in the 1830's "the general membership of the Church knew little, if anything, about it." 
 
|authorsources=
 
*Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Autumn 1966, pages 29-45.
 
|think=
 
*That isn't exactly what James B. Allen said. He said that the story "at best" received "limited circulation."
 
<blockquote>
 
The fact that none of the available contemporary writings about Joseph Smith in the 1830s, none of the publications of the Church in that decade, and no contemporary journal or correspondence yet discovered mentions the story of the first vision '''is convincing evidence that at best it received only limited circulation in those early days.''' (emphasis added)
 
</blockquote>
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=Why did Joseph Smith fail to mention his First Vision when he first wrote the church history in 1835? Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery wrote and published a history of the church that supposedly covered all of the important points related to its beginnings. However, Joseph Smith records a different story than the "official" one later published in 1842. In Joseph Smith's own 1835 published history of the church, he says that his first spiritual experience was in 1823 after a religious revival in Palmyra that same year. 
 
|think=
 
*Because Oliver wrote the history, not Joseph. Oliver was receiving instruction from Joseph.
 
*Why doesn't MormonThink mention here that Joseph ''wrote an account of his First Vision in his journal in 1835''? They quote a reference from the Tanner's which mention it later on the webpage. Why not acknowledge it here?
 
*Did you know that Oliver wrote the two-part account of Joseph's vision as part of the Church history and not Joseph? Did you know that the first part published described exactly the conditions that led to the First Vision, including Joseph's age of 14, before describing the vision itself.
 
*Did you know that by the time that Oliver published the next part, that he said that he had made a mistake on the year, and changed it to '''three years later''' (age 14 to age 17) and then proceeded to describe Moroni's visit instead? Do you get the idea that Joseph told Oliver not to continue the first vision account that he had started to publish and to focus instead on Moroni's visit?
 
*Did you know that Oliver indicated that he had written records that he was using to create the history, and that those records likely included Joseph's 1832 journal account of the First Vision?
 
|quote=
 
|response=
 
|link=Joseph Smith's First Vision/Accounts/Oliver Cowdery not aware of First Vision in 1834-35
 
|subject=Oliver Cowdery's 1834 account of the First Vision/Moroni's visit
 
|summary=Was Oliver Cowdery unaware of the First Vision as late as 1834&ndash;1835?
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=[I]n the early 1800s having visions wasn't perceived to be all that uncommon.  Even Joseph Smith's father claimed to have had a vision - namely the Tree of Life vision.  People believed in magic, seer stones, divining rods, etc. and people claiming to have visions weren't seen as all that strange.  Like much of Joseph's work, the first vision is strikingly similar to someone else's story. 
 
|think=
 
*Which kind of explains why Joseph didn't really mention it to many people. Pastors of that day were starting to look down on people who claimed to see God in a vision - such things were being discouraged.
 
*It was the vision of ''Moroni'' and the subsequent recovery and translation of the Book of Mormon that caused Joseph to realize that his path was different than others who had claimed to see visions. Therefore, Joseph emphasized that and only wrote the full account of his first vision much later.
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=Since Joseph never told anyone about the vision, he wasn't persecuted.  There is simply no evidence that he was ever persecuted for the First Vision....How strange that Joseph says that the neighborhood knew enough about it to persecute this obscure boy, but his own family hadn't heard about it at all.  If Joseph's story had actually occurred and caused said excitement, someone would have mentioned it.  No one did....God & Christ visit a young boy, and because of local gossip, he withheld that info from his family.  And yet then he receives another visitation three years later from an angel, and immediately he tells his family?  Why the inconsistencies?
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=If it really happened, why couldn't Joseph Smith tell a consistent story about such a powerful experience as meeting with God and Jesus Christ face-to-face?
 
How many people forget where they were when their first child was born? Or when they got their patriarchal blessing? Or their wedding night? How many forget who they were with and what happened? If we can remember details such as year, circumstance and those involved, why couldn't Joseph Smith consistently recall basic facts about his incredible First Vision?
 
|think=
 
{{antispeak|mocking}} Note the characterization of Joseph's "powerful experience" and "incredible" First Vision.
 
*Joseph ''did'' remember consistently where he was and when it happened.
 
*How many of you forget the date of your anniversary? Or your dates of your kids' birthdays?
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=In Joseph Smith's first handwritten testimony of the first vision in 1832, he says he already knew all other churches were false before he prayed. Smith testified: "by searching the scriptures I found that mankind did not come unto the Lord but that they had apostatized from the true and living faith and there was no society or denomination that built upon the gospel of Jesus Christ."....Yet in the "official" story written years later by a scribe, it has Joseph Smith saying: "I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong) and which I should join."
 
|think=
 
*If you had come to the conclusion that mankind has apostatized from the true faith, and you suddenly found Jesus standing in front of you, wouldn't ''you'' ask Him if any of those churches was the correct one? Or would you simply tell Him, "never mind, I already figured it out for myself?"
 
*Besides, where is the inconsistency? How many churches did Joseph have immediate knowledge of? Three or four? Joseph determined that the churches with which he had direct experience did not adhere to the scriptures and that therefore mankind "had apostatized from the true and living faith." During his vision, he then asked the Lord which church was right, because it had not occurred to him that the Lord's church ''didn't exist anywhere on the face of the earth.'' It had never entered into his heart that ''all'' churches were wrong.
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=There are earlier versions of the First Vision story in Joseph Smith's own handwriting, but they are not considered "official" and are relatively ignored by the church.<br><br>
 
One thing is clear, the LDS Church does a great disservice to investigators of its claims by presenting Joseph Smith's 1838 account of his first vision as the only version of these events. 
 
|think=
 
*No, it isn't clear at all: Where does the Church claim that the 1838 account is the "only version" of these events?
 
*Did you mean to say that these accounts are "relatively ignored" ''except'' when they are ''mentioned in the ''Ensign'' and on the official Church website lds.org''?
 
|quote=
 
<blockquote>
 
During a 10-year period (1832–42), Joseph Smith wrote or dictated at least four accounts of the First Vision. These accounts are similar in many ways, but they include some differences in emphasis and detail. These differences are complementary. Together, his accounts provide a more complete record of what occurred. The 1838 account found in the Pearl of Great Price is the primary source referred to in the Church.<br>
 
&mdash;[http://lds.org/study/topics/accounts-of-the-first-vision?lang=eng ''Accounts of the First Vision''], Gospel Study, Study by Topic, located on lds.org. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
 
</blockquote>
 
 
 
<blockquote>
 
On at least four different occasions, Joseph Smith either wrote or dictated to scribes accounts of his sacred experience of 1820. Possibly he penned or dictated other histories of the First Vision; if so, they have not been located. <br>
 
&mdash;Milton Backman Jr., [http://www.lds.org/ensign/1985/01/joseph-smiths-recitals-of-the-first-vision?lang=eng Joseph Smith’s Recitals of the First Vision], ''Ensign'', January 1985.
 
</blockquote>
 
 
 
<blockquote>
 
Joseph's vision was at first an intensely personal experience&mdash;an answer to a specific question. Over time, however, illuminated by additional experience and instruction, it became the founding revelation of the Restoration.''
 
<br>
 
&mdash;[http://classic.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?hideNav=1&locale=0&sourceId=aec2515e04f5e110VgnVCM100000176f620a____&vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD Dennis B. Neuenschwander, “Joseph Smith: An Apostle of Jesus Christ,” Ensign, Jan 2009, 16–22]
 
<br><br>
 
I am not worried that the Prophet Joseph Smith gave a number of versions of the first vision anymore than I am worried that there are four different writers of the gospels in the New Testament, each with his own perceptions, each telling the events to meet his own purpose for writing at the time. I am more concerned with the fact that God has revealed in this dispensation a great and marvelous and beautiful plan that motivates men and women to love their Creator and their Redeemer, to appreciate and serve one another, to walk in faith on the road that leads to immortality and eternal life.<br>
 
&mdash;Gordon B. Hinckley, [http://classic.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?hideNav=1&locale=0&sourceId=66a205481ae6b010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____&vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD  “‘God Hath Not Given Us the Spirit of Fear’,] ''Ensign'', Oct 1984, 2]
 
</blockquote>
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 
 
 
==== ====
 
{{MormonThinkIndexClaim
 
|claim=
 
|think=
 
|quote=
 
}}
 

Latest revision as of 06:41, 8 May 2012