Difference between revisions of "Specific works/Jerald and Sandra Tanner"

m (GLSBot: Adding headers to all articles)
m
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{Main Page}}  
 
{{draft}}<br>
 
{{draft}}<br>
 
{{AuthorsDisclaimer}}
 
{{AuthorsDisclaimer}}
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Sandra Tanner and her late husband are certainly among the most prolific anti-Mormon authors. However, non-Mormon scholars of LDS issues have noted that the Tanners display a consistent bias in their work:
 
Sandra Tanner and her late husband are certainly among the most prolific anti-Mormon authors. However, non-Mormon scholars of LDS issues have noted that the Tanners display a consistent bias in their work:
−
 
+
{{Epigraph|[The Tanners] always assume the worst possible motives in assessing the actions of Mormon leaders, even when those leaders faced extremely complex problems with no simple solutions.... Every bit of evidence, even if it could be most plausibly presented in a positive way, is represented as yet another nail in the coffin being prepared for the Mormon Church. There is no spectrum of colors, only blacks and whites, good guys and villains in the Tanners' published writings.... The Tanners have repeatedly assumed a holier-than-thou stance, refusing to be fair in applying the same debate standards of absolute rectitude which they demand of Mormonism to their own actions, writings, and beliefs.<br> &mdash; Lawrence Foster, ''Dialogue''<ref>{{Dialogue|author=Lawrence Foster|article=[http://content.lib.utah.edu/u?/dialogue,17372 Career Apostates:Reflections on the Works of Jerald and Sandra Tanner]|vol=17|num=2|date=Summer 1984|start=45|end=46}}</ref>}}
−
:''[The Tanners] always assume the worst possible motives in assessing the actions of Mormon leaders, even when those leaders faced extremely complex problems with no simple solutions.... Every bit of evidence, even if it could be most plausibly presented in a positive way, is represented as yet another nail in the coffin being prepared for the Mormon Church. There is no spectrum of colors, only blacks and whites, good guys and villains in the Tanners' published writings.... The Tanners have repeatedly assumed a holier-than-thou stance, refusing to be fair in applying the same debate standards of absolute rectitude which they demand of Mormonism to their own actions, writings, and beliefs.''{{ref|fn1}}
 
  
 
==FAIR Wiki articles==
 
==FAIR Wiki articles==
 
<small> These wiki articles address claims made by this author.</small>
 
<small> These wiki articles address claims made by this author.</small>
  
−
* Place wiki links here
+
{{SummaryItem
−
 
+
|link=Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Discussions in New York
−
==Reviews of author's work(s)==
+
|subject=Discussions in New York
−
 
+
|summary=Book of Mormon authorship theories: discussions in New York
−
* Todd Compton's response to Jerald and Sandra Tanners' Review of ''In Sacred Loneliness'' {{link|url=http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Oracle/7207/tanners.html}}
+
}}
−
* {{FR-5-1-17}}<!-- Nibley Black hole-->
+
{{SummaryItem
−
* {{FR-3-1-16}}<!--Norwood Black hole-->
+
|link=Quote_mining/Jerald_and_Sandra_Tanner
−
* {{FR-6-2-13}}<!-- Roper Black Hole that's Not so Black: Answering Mormon Scholars-->
+
|subject=Quote mining and textual distortion in the works of Jerald and Sandra Tanner
−
* {{FR-3-1-17}}<!--Roper Black hole-->
+
|summary=The Tanners are well-known for their practice of selective citation, textual distortion, and omission of context. Some examples are available on this dedicated page.
−
* {{FR-4-1-25}}<!-- Roper shadow or reality-->
+
}}
−
* {{FR-9-1-14}}<!-- Roper: Unanswered Mormon Scholars-->
 
−
* {{FR-6-2-14}}<!-- Tvedtnes Answering Mormon Schol-->
 
−
* {{FR-8-2-13}}<!-- Tvedtnes and Roper: Apocrypha-->
 
−
* {{FR-3-1-18}}<!--Tvedtnes Black hole-->
 
  
−
=={{Endnotes label}}==
 
−
#{{note|fn1}} {{Dialogue|author=Lawrence Foster|article=Career Apostates:Reflections on the Works of Jerald and Sandra Tanner|vol=17|num=2|date=Summer 1984|start=45|end=46}}{{link|url=http://content.lib.utah.edu/u?/dialogue,17372}}
 
  
−
=={{Further reading label}}==
+
{{To learn more box:responses to: Jerald and Sandra Tanner}}
−
{{SpecificAuthorsAndWorks}}
 
  
−
[[fr:Specific works/Jerald and Sandra Tanner]]
+
{{Endnotes sources}}

Latest revision as of 20:59, 11 May 2024

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.


Notes

Sandra Tanner and her late husband are certainly among the most prolific anti-Mormon authors. However, non-Mormon scholars of LDS issues have noted that the Tanners display a consistent bias in their work:

[The Tanners] always assume the worst possible motives in assessing the actions of Mormon leaders, even when those leaders faced extremely complex problems with no simple solutions.... Every bit of evidence, even if it could be most plausibly presented in a positive way, is represented as yet another nail in the coffin being prepared for the Mormon Church. There is no spectrum of colors, only blacks and whites, good guys and villains in the Tanners' published writings.... The Tanners have repeatedly assumed a holier-than-thou stance, refusing to be fair in applying the same debate standards of absolute rectitude which they demand of Mormonism to their own actions, writings, and beliefs.
— Lawrence Foster, Dialogue[1]

FAIR Wiki articles

These wiki articles address claims made by this author.

Discussions in New York

Summary: Book of Mormon authorship theories: discussions in New York

Quote mining and textual distortion in the works of Jerald and Sandra Tanner

Summary: The Tanners are well-known for their practice of selective citation, textual distortion, and omission of context. Some examples are available on this dedicated page.


Learn more about responses to: Jerald and Sandra Tanner
Wiki links
FAIR links
  • Barry R. Bickmore, "The Tanners on the Hereafter:A Case Study in 'Studied Ignorance'," FAIR FAIR link
  • Michael R. Ash, "Up In Smoke: A Response to the Tanners' Criticism of the Word of Wisdom," FAIR Conference, 2000. off-site
  • Mike Ash, "Up In Smoke: A Response To the Tanners’ Criticism of the Word of Wisdom," Proceedings of the 2000 FAIR Conference (August 2000). link
  • Danel Bachman, "Mormonism—Shadow or Reality?: History or Propaganda? Joseph Smith as a Case Study," Proceedings of the 2000 FAIR Conference (August 2000). link
  • Daniel C. Peterson, "'Easier than Research, More Inflammatory than Truth'," Proceedings of the 2000 FAIR Conference (August 2000). link
  • Robert Vukich, "An Incident Concerning Page 81 of 'Mormonism—Shadow or Reality?'," Proceedings of the 2000 FAIR Conference (August 2000). link
Online
Lawrence Foster, Dialogue<ref>Lawrence Foster, "Career Apostates:Reflections on the Works of Jerald and Sandra Tanner," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 17 no. 2 (Summer 1984), 45–46.
  • Todd Compton's response to Jerald and Sandra Tanners' Review of In Sacred Loneliness off-site
  • Allen Wyatt, "Largely Shadow, Short of Reality," Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship 59/6 (17 November 2023). [135–158] link
  • Tom Nibley, "A Look at Jerald and Sandra Tanner's Covering Up the Black Hole in the Book of Mormon," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 5/1 (1993). [273–289] link
  • L. Ara Norwood, "Review of Covering Up the Black Hole in the Book of Mormon by Jerald and Sandra Tanner," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 3/1 (1991). [158–169] link
  • Matthew Roper, "'A Black Hole That's Not So Black (Review of Answering Mormon Scholars: A Response to Criticism of the Book, vol. 1 by Jerald and Sandra Tanner)'," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 6/2 (1994). [156–203] link
  • John A. Tvedtnes and Matthew Roper, "Joseph Smith's Use of the Apocrypha: Shadow or Reality? (Review of Joseph Smith's Use of the Apocrypha by Jerald and Sandra Tanner)," FARMS Review 8/2 (1996). [326–372] link
  • Matthew Roper, "Review of Covering Up the Black Hole in the Book of Mormon by Jerald and Sandra Tanner," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 3/1 (1991). [170–187] link
  • Matthew P. Roper, "Review of Mormonism: Shadow or Reality? by Jerald and Sandra Tanner," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 4/1 (1992). [169–215] link
  • Matthew Roper, "Unanswered Mormon Scholars (Review of Answering Mormon Scholars: A Response to Criticism Raised by Mormon Defenders)," FARMS Review 9/1 (1997). [87–145] link
  • John A. Tvedtnes, "'Review of Answering Mormon Scholars: A Response to Criticism of the Book, vol. 1 by Jerald and Sandra Tanner,'," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 6/2 (1994). [204–249] link
  • John A. Tvedtnes, "Review of Covering Up the Black Hole in the Book of Mormon by Jerald and Sandra Tanner," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 3/1 (1991). [188–230] link
Navigators


Notes

  1. ↑ Lawrence Foster, "Career Apostates:Reflections on the Works of Jerald and Sandra Tanner," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 17 no. 2 (Summer 1984), 45–46.
Retrieved from "https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=Specific_works/Jerald_and_Sandra_Tanner&oldid=257808"