Difference between revisions of "Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate/A Pragmatic Approach"

m (top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Main Page}}
 
{{BookHeader
 
{{BookHeader
 
|title=[[../../../]]
 
|title=[[../../../]]
Line 12: Line 13:
 
*It makes a great deal of sense to ask which of two actual and competing theories fits the facts better. (Kuhn, 147).
 
*It makes a great deal of sense to ask which of two actual and competing theories fits the facts better. (Kuhn, 147).
 
Paradigm choice is a value-based tentative decision (that is, faith), not rule-based final decision (that is, not perfect knowledge).
 
Paradigm choice is a value-based tentative decision (that is, faith), not rule-based final decision (that is, not perfect knowledge).
 
[[fr:Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate/A Pragmatic Approach]]
 

Latest revision as of 14:01, 13 April 2024

[[{{{L}}}|{{{H}}}]]

A Pragmatic Approach to Paradigm Debate

  • Theories are neither verified, nor falsified, but assessed by a variety of criteria. (Barbour, 116)
  • It makes a great deal of sense to ask which of two actual and competing theories fits the facts better. (Kuhn, 147).
Paradigm choice is a value-based tentative decision (that is, faith), not rule-based final decision (that is, not perfect knowledge).