|
|
(31 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | {| style="margin: 0em 0em 0em 0em; border: 0px; align="right" cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
| + | #REDIRECT [[Question: Does the fact that the Doctrine and Covenants refers to North American Indians as "Lamanites" contradict the theory that the Book of Mormon events took place in Mesoamerica?]] |
− | |-
| |
− | | {{DNAPortal}}
| |
− | |-
| |
− | | {{GeographyPortal}}
| |
− | |}
| |
− | {{question}}
| |
− | | |
− | ==Question==
| |
− | Since in the Doctrine and Covenants the Lord refers to American Indians in North America as "Lamanites" (e.g., {{s||DC|28|8-9,14}}, {{s||DC|30|6}}, {{s||DC|32|2}}, {{s||DC|54|8}}), does this cause problems for the Limited Geography Theory ([[Book_of_Mormon_geography:New_World:LGT|LGT]]) or issues of Amerindian genetic data?
| |
− | | |
− | ==Response==
| |
− | | |
− | ===Limited Geography Theory (LGT) theory and the D&C===
| |
− | ====The Book of Mormon defines "Lamanites" were those that were ''not'' Nephites====
| |
− | The LGT is not a doctrine of the Church and there is no necessity to accept it as the only interpretation of the Book of Mormon text. Those who accept the LGT view it as the only theory that is consistent with the geographic descriptions and distances found in the Book of Mormon. The truth of the Book of Mormon does not depend, however, on proving or supporting the LGT.
| |
− | | |
− | The LGT assumes that a small number of Lehites were introduced into a larger "sea" of native peoples, most of whom were of presumably of Asiatic origin. Critics mistake the use of the term "Lamanite" as requiring descent from Lehi through his son, Laman. But, from very early in the Book of Mormon record, it is clear that the term "Lamanite" does not refer to descent, but to political and religious affiliation:
| |
− | | |
− | :...I shall call them Lamanites that seek to destroy the people of Nephi, and those who are friendly to Nephi I shall call Nephites, or the people of Nephi, according to the reigns of the kings. ({{s||Jacob|1|14}})
| |
− | | |
− | So, any person who wasn't a Nephite was, by exclusion, a Lamanite. Lamanites were ''not'' confined in any geographic sense at all.
| |
− | | |
− | ====The Lamanites occupied a region far greater than the limited geography described in the Book of Mormon====
| |
− | The LGT holds that the story of the Book of Mormon and the peoples with which it is concerned were confined to a narrow region, since this is all the area with which the authors of the Book of Mormon were directly concerned. Yet the Book of Mormon has several references that suggest a knowledge of and interaction with a much greater geographical area. The story of Hagoth ({{s||Alma|63|4-9}}) speaks not only of the shipbuilder and his movements northward (out of the general area referred to in the Book of Mormon) but also others that migrated to the north. In Helaman 3 we find other references to people migrating to the north:
| |
− | | |
− | :And it came to pass in the forty and sixth [year], yea, there was much contention and many dissensions; in the which there were an exceedingly great many who departed out of the land of Zarahemla, and went forth unto the land northward to inherit the land. And they did travel to an exceedingly great distance, insomuch that they came to large bodies of water and many rivers. Yea, and even they did spread forth into all parts of the land, into whatever parts it had not been rendered desolate and without timber, because of the many inhabitants who had before inherited the land. ({{s||Helaman|3|3-5}})
| |
− | | |
− | The migration was out of the general area of the Book of Mormon story and is referred to as "an exceedingly great distance." This gives opportunity for Lamanites and Nephites to be found in ''all parts'' of the western hemisphere. There is no reason not to believe that similar migrations could have occurred to the south. Migrations to both the north and to the south were possibly more common than is recorded in the text.
| |
− | | |
− | ====The native Americans in the region where Joseph lived ''were'' Lamanites====
| |
− | The situation in the 19th century was different than that 1500 years earlier, when the Book of Mormon was written (i.e., about <small>A.D.</small> 400 at the latest). By Joseph Smith's era, if Lehi left ''any'' descendants at all, then ''every single person in the hemisphere'' was a descendant of Lehi. (''Main article: [[Amerindians_as_Lamanites#All_From_Lehi|Amerindians as Lamanites: All from Lehi]]'')
| |
− | | |
− | This doesn't mean that they got the majority of their DNA from Lehi, or that one would likely be so spectacularly lucky as to find a genetic marker from him, but they would be literal descendants to some degree, and yet would likely have predominantly Asian DNA markers.
| |
− | | |
− | ===The nature of quotations found in the Doctrine & Covenants===
| |
− | | |
− | Many readers assume that revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants in which Joseph Smith speaks in "God's voice" to be direct "word-for-word" quotations from God. The recently published second volume of ''Joseph Smith Papers'', released by the Church's official Church History Press, provides greater insight into the process by which the revelations in the D&C arrived in their present form. The Church notes revisions in the revelations from their earliest form. A good example of this is the revelation concerning Oliver Cowdery's "gift"‐this revelation was edited by Oliver Cowdery, William W. Phelps, Sidney Rigdon, Joseph Smith, John Whitmer, and one other unidentified editor. The Church has identified which specific edits each of these individuals made to the original revelation which eventually became D&C Section 8. (For more detail on this particular section, see [[Doctrine and Covenants/Oliver Cowdery and the "rod of nature"}}
| |
− | | |
− | Joseph didn't claim to be hearing a voice or that he was "taking dictation." Rather, impressions would come to him, which he would put into words. Joseph clearly did not consider them word-for-word quotations from God, since he, and others, felt comfortable revising them prior to publication. This would be strange if Joseph saw them as word-for-word quotes, but not so strange when we understand how he saw the matter.
| |
− | | |
− | This means that "Lamanites" to describe the American Indians was Joseph's word choice. The few personal statements he made on Book of Mormon geography indicate that he believed it took place on a hemispheric scale, so it would be natural for him to believe that all Native Americans were pure descendants of Laman, and hence were literal "Lamanites." Even so, as noted in the preceding section, all of the inhabitants of the North and South American continents are considered to be Lamanites, and can likely count Lehi among their ancestry.
| |
− | | |
− | {{Detail|Doctrine and Covenants/Direct quotation from God|Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes}}
| |
− | | |
− | ==Conclusion==
| |
− | | |
− | By the time the Doctrine and Covenants was written, Lehi's descendants had ample time to migrate and intermarry with the large number of "natives" postulated by the LGT. Such descendants are "Lamanites" in at least three senses:
| |
− | # all shared descent from Lehi, to some degree.
| |
− | # none embraced Nephite kingship or their doctrine of Christ, making them "Lamanites" politically.
| |
− | # all were eligible for the covenant blessings promised to Lehi's descendants, if they would repent.
| |
− | | |
− | ==Further reading==
| |
− | | |
− | ===FAIR wiki articles===
| |
− | {{BoMGeographyWiki}}
| |
− | {{DNAWiki}}
| |
− | {{DCWiki}}
| |
− | ===FAIR web site===
| |
− | {{DNAFAIR}}
| |
− | {{DCFAIR}}
| |
− | | |
− | ===External links===
| |
− | {{DNALinks}}
| |
− | {{DCLinks}}
| |
− | | |
− | ===Printed material===
| |
− | {{DNAPrint}}
| |
− | {{DCPrint}}
| |