Difference between revisions of "Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision"

(tag)
m (top: bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}})
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
+
{{Main Page}}
 +
{{H2
 +
|L=Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision
 +
|H=An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
 +
|S=
 +
|L1=
 +
}}
 
{{FAIRAnalysisWikipedia
 
{{FAIRAnalysisWikipedia
 
|title=An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
 
|title=An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
Line 6: Line 12:
 
|section=
 
|section=
 
|previous=
 
|previous=
|next=[[../Joseph Smith, Jr.|Joseph Smith, Jr.]]
+
|next=[[../Joseph Smith, Jr.]]
 
|notes={{WikipediaDisclaimer}}
 
|notes={{WikipediaDisclaimer}}
 
}}
 
}}
  
=An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"=
+
={{WikipediaUpdate|9/17/2011}}=
{{Epigraph|"First Vision packs a lot more punch in a shorter amount of space..." Yes it does, John Foxe, because it is an anti-mormon tract written in the modern style. Today, the 'rant' of an older style tract would make most people's eyes roll, they wouldn't give it a moment's consideration. However, the First Vision article presents the anti-mormon POV in a scholarly tone. It criticizes without ever explicitly stating a criticism. It keeps certain things hidden in the dark. It is sly, sneaky, and underhanded. It reads like an anti-mormon tract written by Eddie Haskell after he went to graduate school. To use your own word John Foxe, it is 'foxey'. <br>Editor "74s181" (26 August 2007) {{link|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:First_Vision/Archive_7#Similar_'Good_Article'_example}} }}
 
{{parabreak}}
 
The following sub-articles analyze sections of the Wikipedia "First Vision" article. We do not address the introductory section. The sections examined are the following:
 
  
*[[/Historical context|Historical context]]
+
{{SummaryItem
*[[/The vision|The vision]]
+
|link=/Story of the vision
*[[/How the vision story has been presented|How the vision story has been presented]]
+
|subject=Story of the vision
*[[/How people have responded to the First Vision|How people have responded to the First Vision]]
+
|summary=
 
+
}}
{{suggestions}}
+
{{SummaryItem
 +
|link=/Background in the supernatural
 +
|subject=Background in the supernatural
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
{{SummaryItem
 +
|link=/Dating the First Vision
 +
|subject=Dating the First Vision
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
{{SummaryItem
 +
|link=/Recorded accounts of the vision
 +
|subject=Recorded accounts of the vision
 +
|summary=
 +
}}
 +
{{SummaryItem
 +
|link=/Interpretations and responses to the vision
 +
|subject=Interpretations and responses to the vision
 +
|summary=
 +
}}

Latest revision as of 06:17, 15 May 2024

An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"



A FairMormon Analysis of Wikipedia: An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
A work by a collaboration of authors (Link to Wikipedia article here)
The name Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. Wikipedia content is copied and made available under the GNU Free Documentation License.

 Updated 9/17/2011

Story of the vision

Background in the supernatural

Dating the First Vision

Recorded accounts of the vision

Interpretations and responses to the vision