Difference between revisions of "Template:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:All from Lehi"

Revision as of 21:01, 3 July 2009 (view source) GregSmith (talk | contribs) m (Undo revision 46636 by GregSmith (Talk)) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 09:36, 26 November 2016 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs)
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	*  If Lehi existed, then population genetics predicts that virtually all Amerindians and Polynesians ''are'' his literal descendants. They are simply not ''exclusively'' his descendants.	+	{{appeal to ridicule|Taking the position that Lehi existed, then population genetics predicts that virtually all Amerindians and Polynesians are his literal descendants. They are simply not exclusively his descendants. The author wants to make Lehite links absurd or impossible.
−	* [[Amerindians_as_Lamanites#All_From_Lehi|All from Lehi?]]	+	}}
−	* ''The author wants to make Lehite links absurd or impossible.'' {{Repeat|l1=xvi|l2=37|l3=38|l4=47|l5=54|l6=202|l7=205|l8=208|#xvi|#37|#38|#47|#54|#202|#205|#208}}

---

Latest revision as of 09:36, 26 November 2016

Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Ridicule—The author is presenting the argument in such a way that it makes his or her subject look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument or exaggerating it.

Taking the position that Lehi existed, then population genetics predicts that virtually all Amerindians and Polynesians are his literal descendants. They are simply not exclusively his descendants. The author wants to make Lehite links absurd or impossible.