Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/American Massacre/Chapter 11"

m
m (bot use legacy Detail template)
 
(53 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
+
{{Main Page}} 
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
+
{{H1
|title=[[../../]]
+
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/American Massacre/Chapter 11
|author=Sally Denton
+
|H=Response to claims made in Chapter 11: "Deseret, September 12, 1857"
|noauthor=
+
|S=
|section=[[../../Index/|Index of claims]]: Chapter 11
+
|L1=
|previous=[[../Chapter 10|Chapter 10]]
+
|T=[[../../|American Massacre: The Tragedy at Mountain Meadows]]
|next=[[../Chapter 12|Chapter 12]]
+
|A=Sally Denton
|notes={{AuthorsDisclaimer}}
+
|<=[[../Chapter 10|Chapter 10]]
 +
|>=[[../Chapter 12|Chapter 12]]
 
}}
 
}}
 +
[[File:Chart AM chapter 11.png|center|frame]]
 +
<onlyinclude>
 +
{{H2
 +
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/American Massacre/Chapter 11
 +
|H=Response to claims made in American Massacre: The Tragedy at Mountain Meadows, "Chapter 11: Deseret, September 12, 1857"
 +
|S=
 +
|L1=Response to claim: 152 - The event was referred to as the "blood feast of the Danites"
 +
|L2=Response to claim: 152 - It is claimed that it is "inconceivable that a crime of this magnitude could have occurred" without being directly ordered by Brigham Young
 +
|L3=Response to claim: 153 - The author claims that the murderers reported that a "divine revelation from Brigham Young" was read aloud which commanded them to attack the "cursed gentiles"
 +
|L4=Response to claim: 154-155 - Helen Brockett "was told by her grandmother that her great-grandfather J.J. Davidson had been ordered by Brigham Young to go south to participate in the slaughter"
 +
|L5=Response to claim: 156 - The author claims that the Church invented the myth of "poisoned springs"
 +
|L6=Response to claim: 158 - It is claimed that on September 1, 1857, Brigham enlisted the support of the Indians "against the wagon train"
 +
|L7=Response to claim: 159 - The author claims that Indians were not involved with the massacre; it was all Mormons
 +
}}
 +
</onlyinclude>
  
===Claims made in Chapter 11: "Camp Scott, November 16, 1857"===
+
==Response to claim: 152 - The event was referred to as the "blood feast of the Danites"==
{{BeginClaimsTable}}
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
||
+
|title=American Massacre
====165====
+
|claim=
||
+
The event was referred to as the "blood feast of the Danites."
*The author claims that during meetings with U.S. Army Quartermaster Captian Stewart Van Vliet, Brigham Young had "seen to it that Van Vliet heard nothing of Mountain Meadows," and that the "Mormon leaders worried that if van Vliet relayed news of the situation to Johnston, an invasion of Utah Territory would be expedited."
+
|authorsources=<br>
||
+
#No source provided.
* {{HistoricalError}}: It was virtually impossible for anyone in Salt Lake to have heard of the Massacre (which happened on 11 September) by the time Van Vliet left on 14 Sept, or last met with Brigham Young on 13 Sept.
+
}}
* "Army Quartermaster Captain Stewart Van Vliet came to Salt Lake City on 8 September and left after midnight on 14 September 1857 to arrange for the advancing army's provisions.  Denton tells us that Brigham Young carefully shielded Van Vliet to hear nothing of the massacre, because if Van Vliet came to know about it, "an invasion of Utah Territory would be expedited" (p. 165). There is no historical support for this claim. The claim is also impossible to support. Because the massacre was not over until 11 September 1857,23 there is no possibility that Brigham Young could have known of the massacre before his last meeting with Van Vliet on 13 September 1857."{{ref|van.vliet.deceit}}  
+
{{propaganda|This inflammatory language is unsourced, and provided without evidence.}}
||
+
*{{Detail_old|Mormonism and persecution/Danites|l1=Danites}}
*No source provided for this particular claim, although the following citation is Van Vliet quoted in {{CriticalWork:Stenhouse:Rocky Mountain Saints|pages=357}}
+
*{{Detail_old|Mormonism and persecution/Danites/Danites_in_anti-Mormon_polemic|l1=Danites in anti-Mormon polemic}}
|-
 
|
 
  
====165====
+
==Response to claim: 152 - It is claimed that it is "inconceivable that a crime of this magnitude could have occurred" without being directly ordered by Brigham Young==
||
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
*The author claims that Brigham did not preach the sermon at the church meeting attended by Van Vliet because he was "too furious to conduct the service."
+
|title=American Massacre
||
+
|claim=
*Brigham actually ''did'' preach two sermons that day (13 September 1857).
+
It is claimed that it is "inconceivable that a crime of this magnitude could have occurred" without being directly ordered by Brigham Young, and that "[v]irtually every federal officer who became involved in future investigations" of the massacre concluded that Brigham "personally ordered" the attack.
*See: {{JDwiki|author=Brigham Young|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Journal_of_Discourses/Volume_5/The_United_States_Administration_and_Utah_Army|vol=5|pages=226–31}}
+
|authorsources=<br>
*See: {{JDwiki|author=Brigham Young|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Journal_of_Discourses/Volume_5/Movements_of_the_Saints%E2%80%99_Enemies%E2%80%94The_Crisis|vol=5|pages=231–36}}  
+
#The author notes that Lee "would have carried out no orders which he thought would be contrary to the wishes of Brigham Young," citing Juanita Brooks, ''The Mountain Meadows Massacre'', p. 80.
*Reviewer Robert Crocket notes, "Denton’s failure to know of Young’s sermons suggests a rather light review of her secondary sources. On 13 September 1857, in the Bowery, Brigham Young indeed said he was too angry to preach but then filled the day with two lengthy sermons nonetheless. Regardless of who spoke, I would have imagined that anybody writing about this event would have taken time to examine the Journal of Discourses to see what was actually said with Van Vliet in attendance." {{ref|crockett.1}}
+
}}
||
+
{{propaganda|
*No source provided. Likely Stenhouse.
+
Why is in "inconceivable" that a crime could be committed in southern Utah without Brigham's direct order?  The Massacre site was, which required an arduous horseback race of nearly 300 miles, which took from 7&ndash;13 September to send and receive a message from Brigham Young. <ref>{{Ensign|author=Richard E. Turley Jr.|article=The Mountain Meadows Massacre|date=September 2007|start=14|end=21}}{{link|url=http://www.lds.org/mountain-meadows-massacre}}</ref>  Is Brigham to be held responsible for every crime committed in the territory?
|-
+
*The initial prosecution of those responsible for the murders failed because federal officials were so anxious to tie them to Brigham Young&mdash;but the evidence to do so did not exist.
|
+
}}
 +
*{{Detail_old|Mountain Meadows Massacre/Prosecution}}
 +
*{{Detail_old|Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Use of sources/Brigham Young ordered MMM|l1=Brigham Young ordered Mountain Meadows Massacre?}}
  
====165====
+
==Response to claim: 153 - The author claims that the murderers reported that a "divine revelation from Brigham Young" was read aloud which commanded them to attack the "cursed gentiles"==
||
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
*The author claims that Brigham made an "oblique but unrecognized reference to the massacre at Mountain Meadows" to Van Vliet when he said "if the government dare to force the issue, I shall not hold the Indians by the wrist any longer...you may tell the government to stop all emigration across the continent, for the Indians will kill all who attempt it."
+
|title=American Massacre
||
+
|claim=
*The author just said earlier that Brigham had "seen to it that Van Vliet heard nothing of Mountain Meadows." Now she's saying that Brigham made an "oblique but unrecognized reference" to it!
+
The author claims that the murderers reported that a "divine revelation from Brigham Young" was read aloud which commanded them to attack the "cursed gentiles" and "attack them, disguised as Indians" and "leave none to tell the tale."
||
+
|authorsources=<br>
*Bancroft, 505.
+
#C. V. Waite, ''The Mormon Prophet and His Harem'' (1866), 66.
|-
+
}}
|
+
{{propaganda|The author's source is a nineteenth-century anti-Mormon expose&ndash;hardly a reliable source. It is unsurprising that the murderers would attempt to claim they were "only following orders." "Her source for this alleged fact is to a sensational exposé common of the era: Catharine Van Valkenburg Waite's ''The Mormon Prophet and His Harem; Or, An Authentic History of Brigham Young, His Numerous Wives and Children''. Waite was an early suffragist married to a federal judge. She did not name names or provide sources in her book. Her stated objective was to reclaim the "suffering women of Utah." She is the sole source for this "revelation," which has no basis in historical fact." <ref>{{FR-16-1-9}}</ref>
====167====
 
||
 
*Any "Mormon man" who defied Brigham's declaration of Martial law would be "put to death."
 
||
 
||
 
*Brigham Young proclamation, alternately dated August 5 and September 15, 1857, original copies located in Special Collections, Marriott University Library, University of Utah. Reprinted in Fielding, ''Unsolicted Chronicler'', 395;
 
*{{CriticalWork:Stenhouse:Rocky Mountain Saints|pages=358-59}}
 
|-
 
|
 
  
====167====
+
Brigham wrote a letter which commanded those in southern Utah to leave the immigrants alone.
||
+
}}
*The author states that "any man who defied Young's orders would be put to death was made evident in his statement "When the time comes to burn and lay waste our improvements, if any man undertakes to shield his, he will be sheared down."
+
*{{Detail_old|Mountain Meadows massacre/Brigham Young/Did Brigham order it/Brigham's letter mysteriously lost|l1=Brigham Young's letter}}
||
+
*{{Detail_old|Mountain Meadows massacre/Brigham Young/Did Brigham order it|l1=Brigham Young did not order the Mountain Meadows Massacre}}
* Denton uses a secondary source, when she could have easily verified Brigham's words in the ''Journal of Discourses''.
 
* {{SourceDistortion}}: In context, Brigham's word assume a different tone. Immediately following the phrase quoted by the author, Brigham says "Now the faint-hearted can go in peace; but should that time come, they must not interfere." This is ''not'' a threat of death to those who would not participate.
 
*See: [[Disobey Brigham and be sheared down|Disobey Brigham and be sheared down?]]
 
||
 
* Young quoted in Waite, 50.
 
* [See {{JDwiki|author=Brigham Young|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Journal_of_Discourses/Volume_5/Movements_of_the_Saints%E2%80%99_Enemies%E2%80%94The_Crisis|vol=5|pages=232}} (13 Sept 1857).]
 
|-
 
|
 
  
====167====
+
==Response to claim: 154-155 - Helen Brockett "was told by her grandmother that her great-grandfather J.J. Davidson had been ordered by Brigham Young to go south to participate in the slaughter"==
||
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
*The date of Brigham's proclamation "was changed from August to September" in order to destroy evidence that it authorized the Mountain Meadows Massacre.
+
|title=American Massacre
||
+
|claim=
||
+
Helen Brockett "was told by her grandmother that her great-grandfather J.J. Davidson had been ordered by Brigham Young to go south to participate in the slaughter." It is claimed that "Young called in the Avenging angels and told them to use bows and arrows to shoot the people in the back after they were already dead to make it look like Indians did it."
*Gibbs, ''Mountain Meadows Massacre'', 11.
+
|authorsources=<br>
|-
+
#Author's telephone interview with Helen Brockett, October 18, 2002.
|
+
}}
====172====
+
{{misinformation|
||
+
The author here relies on a fourth-hand account&mdash;something Brockett's grandmother said that her great-grandfather said that Brigham Young said.  This is unpersuasive when contemporary evidence indicates that Brigham ordered the immigrants be allowed to pass unmolested.
*The author claims that "droves of Saints leaving California for Utah" and "a matching number leaving Utah of a crisis of conscience spurred by the events of Mountain Meadows" were "doomed to pass over the site of the slaughter."
+
}}
||
+
*{{Detail_old|Mountain Meadows massacre/Brigham Young/Did Brigham order it/Brigham's letter mysteriously lost|l1=Brigham Young's letter}}
||
+
*{{Detail_old|Mountain Meadows massacre/Brigham Young/Did Brigham order it|l1=Brigham Young did not order the Mountain Meadows Massacre}}
*No source provided.
+
* {{BYUS|author=Ronald W. Walker|date=2003|vol=42|num=1|start=139|end=152|article='Save the Emigrants': Joseph Clewes on the Mountain Meadows Massacre}} {{pdflink|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/Products/MoreInfoPage/MoreInfo.aspx?Type=7&ProdID=2083}}
|-
+
 
|
+
==Response to claim: 156 - The author claims that the Church invented the myth of "poisoned springs"==
====172====
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
||
+
|title=American Massacre
*Ann Eliza Young claims that she "knew instinctively, as did many others, that something was being hidden from the mass of the people."
+
|claim=
||
+
The author claims that the Church invented the myth of "poisoned springs."
* {{Absurd}}: So now, Ann Eliza's intuitions are serving as evidence.  Ann Eliza was writing later in life as an anti-Mormon lecturer, and used all the anti-Mormon tropes.
+
|authorsources=<br>
* See {{Nibley11|start=413|end=468}} {{GL1|url=http://gospelink.com.gospelink.com/library/document/31152}}
+
#The author states in an endnote on page 266 that "the poison tale was never told the same way twice," citing {{CriticalWork:Bagley:Blood of the Prophets|pages=119}}
||
+
* {{CrossRef:Bagley:Blood of the Prophets|pages=119}}
*{{CriticalWork:Young:Wife No. 19|pages=229}}
+
*The author also cites Forney to Greenwood, August 1859, "The Massacre at Mountain Meadows," ''Harper's.
|-
+
}}
|
+
{{misinformation|
 +
{{misinformation| "The Church" did not invent the "poisoned spring" myth.  Some ''members of the Church'' who wished to justify their murders after the fact used claims about poisoning to excuse their deeds.  (It may be that some sincerely believed the springs to have been poisoned, when anthrax was instead responsible for the deaths of livestock.) <ref>{{MMM1|start=124&ndash;125}}</ref>  In any case, the sincerity of belief that the springs were poisoned in no way justifies the massacre.
 +
}}
  
====173====
+
==Response to claim: 158 - It is claimed that on September 1, 1857, Brigham enlisted the support of the Indians "against the wagon train"==
||
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
*It is claimed that Brigham Young instructed John D. Lee to write a letter laying the blame for the massacre on the Indians.
+
|title=American Massacre
||
+
|claim=
* As noted on the notes for [[American Massacre/Index#142|p. 142]], local leaders had planned to blame the Indians long before Brigham Young even knew of their intentions, or instructed them to leave the immigrants alone.
+
It is claimed that on September 1, 1857, Brigham enlisted the support of the Indians "against the wagon train."
||
+
|authorsources=<br>
*No source provided.
+
#Journal of Dimick Baker Huntington, September 1, 1857.
|-
+
}}
|
+
{{misinformation|
 +
* {{SourceDistortion}}: Huntington's diary indicates that Indians were being recruited to scatter all cattle ahead of the approaching U.S. army and any other wagon trains.  This had nothing to do with attacking people.
 +
* {{SecondaryFact}}: the author here likely follows Will Bagley's ''Blood of the Prophets'' which likewise contains a [[Blood_of_the_Prophets:_Brigham_Young_and_the_Massacre_at_Mountain_Meadows#Raising allies?|serious misreading]] of Huntington's journal.
 +
}}
 +
*{{Detail_old|Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One_Nation_Under_Gods/Use_of_sources/Brigham_Young_ordered_MMM|l1=Dimick Huntington Diary, 1 September 1857}}
  
====173====
+
==Response to claim: 159 - The author claims that Indians were not involved with the massacre; it was all Mormons==
||
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
*Brigham is claimed to have told Chief Walker's successor Arapeen to "help himself to what he wanted" of the "spoils of the slaughter."
+
|title=American Massacre
||
+
|claim=
* {{SecondaryFact}}: Denton again follows Bagley completely uncritically, and makes the same errors.
+
The author claims that Indians were not involved with the massacre; it was all Mormons.
* {{HistoricalError}}: [[Blood_of_the_Prophets:_Brigham_Young_and_the_Massacre_at_Mountain_Meadows/Use of sources/Indian chief Arapeen given booty|Indian chief Arapeen given booty?]]
+
|authorsources=<br>
||
+
#}}
*''Dimick B. Huntington Journal'', September 20, 1857.
+
{{disinformation|
*{{CrossRef:Bagley:Blood of the Prophets|pages=170a}}
+
{{SourceDistortion}}: "Denton has deceived the reader with the way she uses the Hurt report. The Indians' first report to Hurt, from Indians not affiliated with the Paiutes, was that Indians were not responsible. This is the only quotation Denton uses. But Hurt was suspicious, and he investigated further. He found and reported the truth. Indians and Mormons committed the atrocity. Yet, because Hurt's final conclusions don't square with Denton's thesis, we are not told about them." <ref>{{FR-16-1-9}}</ref>
|-
+
}}
|
 
  
====176, 180====
+
{{endnotes sources}}
||
 
*Colonel Thomas Kane is portrayed as arrogant, effeminate, a hypochondriac, and with delusions of fame.
 
||
 
* {{Presentism}}: [[Mountain Meadows Massacre/Thomas Kane|Thomas Kane]]
 
*{{SecondaryFact}}: Denton seems to rely heavily on Bagley's treatment here.
 
||
 
*{{attn}}
 
* {{CrossRef:Bagley:Blood of the Prophets|pages=198}}
 
|-
 
|
 
  
====186====
 
||
 
*Prior to the massacre, George A. Smith is claimed to "have carried orders to Cedar City leaders to incite their people to avenge the blood of the prophets."
 
||
 
* "This argument assumes Brigham Young had formulated the plan for destruction when the Fancher train was still in Salt Lake City on 5 August 1857. There is no evidence of material provocation by the Fancher train at this early stage except from persons with no reliable basis upon which to provide testimony....Nobody has ever offered any believable evidence that George A. Smith gave instructions to Haight and Lee to massacre the train. John D. Lee is the only person who purported to offer evidence of these instructions," and Lee had a clear motive to lie to save his own skin and make his memoirs more marketable.  "Lee's claim that George A. Smith met Lee in southern Utah on 1 September 1857 (an approximate date deduced from Lee's text) with orders of destruction was impossible because Smith was hundreds of miles away in Salt Lake City on that very day, as well as the day before."  Thus, Lee is wrong on those events which we can verify.{{ref|crockett.2}}
 
||
 
*No source provided. (Likely Bagley)
 
|-
 
|
 
  
====186====
 
||
 
*George A. Smith was "sent south not to learn the truth, but to devise an explanation for church leaders could provide to external enemies..."
 
||
 
* {{DoubleStandard}}: [[Blood_of_the_Prophets:_Brigham_Young_and_the_Massacre_at_Mountain_Meadows/Use_of_sources/Double_standards_of_skepticism|Double standards in evidence]]
 
||
 
*{{CriticalWork:Bagley:Blood of the Prophets|pages=212}}
 
|-
 
|
 
  
====186====
+
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
||
 
*George A. Smith "went to lengths to characterize the victims as cowards."
 
||
 
||
 
*George A. Smith report in Juanita Brooks, ''The Mountain Meadows Massacre'', p. 242.
 
{{EndTable}}
 

Latest revision as of 00:03, 31 May 2024

Contents

Response to claims made in Chapter 11: "Deseret, September 12, 1857"



A FAIR Analysis of: American Massacre: The Tragedy at Mountain Meadows, a work by author: Sally Denton
Chart AM chapter 11.png

Response to claims made in American Massacre: The Tragedy at Mountain Meadows, "Chapter 11: Deseret, September 12, 1857"


Jump to details:


Response to claim: 152 - The event was referred to as the "blood feast of the Danites"

The author(s) of American Massacre make(s) the following claim:

The event was referred to as the "blood feast of the Danites."

Author's sources:
  1. No source provided.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

This inflammatory language is unsourced, and provided without evidence.

Response to claim: 152 - It is claimed that it is "inconceivable that a crime of this magnitude could have occurred" without being directly ordered by Brigham Young

The author(s) of American Massacre make(s) the following claim:

It is claimed that it is "inconceivable that a crime of this magnitude could have occurred" without being directly ordered by Brigham Young, and that "[v]irtually every federal officer who became involved in future investigations" of the massacre concluded that Brigham "personally ordered" the attack.

Author's sources:
  1. The author notes that Lee "would have carried out no orders which he thought would be contrary to the wishes of Brigham Young," citing Juanita Brooks, The Mountain Meadows Massacre, p. 80.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

Why is in "inconceivable" that a crime could be committed in southern Utah without Brigham's direct order? The Massacre site was, which required an arduous horseback race of nearly 300 miles, which took from 7–13 September to send and receive a message from Brigham Young. [1] Is Brigham to be held responsible for every crime committed in the territory?
  • The initial prosecution of those responsible for the murders failed because federal officials were so anxious to tie them to Brigham Young—but the evidence to do so did not exist.

Response to claim: 153 - The author claims that the murderers reported that a "divine revelation from Brigham Young" was read aloud which commanded them to attack the "cursed gentiles"

The author(s) of American Massacre make(s) the following claim:

The author claims that the murderers reported that a "divine revelation from Brigham Young" was read aloud which commanded them to attack the "cursed gentiles" and "attack them, disguised as Indians" and "leave none to tell the tale."

Author's sources:
  1. C. V. Waite, The Mormon Prophet and His Harem (1866), 66.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim contains propaganda - The author, or the author's source, is providing information or ideas in a slanted way in order to instill a particular attitude or response in the reader

The author's source is a nineteenth-century anti-Mormon expose–hardly a reliable source. It is unsurprising that the murderers would attempt to claim they were "only following orders." "Her source for this alleged fact is to a sensational exposé common of the era: Catharine Van Valkenburg Waite's The Mormon Prophet and His Harem; Or, An Authentic History of Brigham Young, His Numerous Wives and Children. Waite was an early suffragist married to a federal judge. She did not name names or provide sources in her book. Her stated objective was to reclaim the "suffering women of Utah." She is the sole source for this "revelation," which has no basis in historical fact." [2]

Brigham wrote a letter which commanded those in southern Utah to leave the immigrants alone.

Response to claim: 154-155 - Helen Brockett "was told by her grandmother that her great-grandfather J.J. Davidson had been ordered by Brigham Young to go south to participate in the slaughter"

The author(s) of American Massacre make(s) the following claim:

Helen Brockett "was told by her grandmother that her great-grandfather J.J. Davidson had been ordered by Brigham Young to go south to participate in the slaughter." It is claimed that "Young called in the Avenging angels and told them to use bows and arrows to shoot the people in the back after they were already dead to make it look like Indians did it."

Author's sources:
  1. Author's telephone interview with Helen Brockett, October 18, 2002.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: The author has stated erroneous information or misinterpreted their sources

The author here relies on a fourth-hand account—something Brockett's grandmother said that her great-grandfather said that Brigham Young said. This is unpersuasive when contemporary evidence indicates that Brigham ordered the immigrants be allowed to pass unmolested.

Response to claim: 156 - The author claims that the Church invented the myth of "poisoned springs"

The author(s) of American Massacre make(s) the following claim:

The author claims that the Church invented the myth of "poisoned springs."

Author's sources:
  1. The author states in an endnote on page 266 that "the poison tale was never told the same way twice," citing Will Bagley, Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows (University of Oklahoma Press, 2002), 119.
  • Compare treatment in Blood of the Prophets: p. 119.
  • The author also cites Forney to Greenwood, August 1859, "The Massacre at Mountain Meadows," Harper's.

FAIR's Response

{{misinformation|

Fact checking results: The author has stated erroneous information or misinterpreted their sources

"The Church" did not invent the "poisoned spring" myth. Some members of the Church who wished to justify their murders after the fact used claims about poisoning to excuse their deeds. (It may be that some sincerely believed the springs to have been poisoned, when anthrax was instead responsible for the deaths of livestock.) [3] In any case, the sincerity of belief that the springs were poisoned in no way justifies the massacre.


Response to claim: 158 - It is claimed that on September 1, 1857, Brigham enlisted the support of the Indians "against the wagon train"

The author(s) of American Massacre make(s) the following claim:

It is claimed that on September 1, 1857, Brigham enlisted the support of the Indians "against the wagon train."

Author's sources:
  1. Journal of Dimick Baker Huntington, September 1, 1857.

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: The author has stated erroneous information or misinterpreted their sources

  •  Misrepresentation of source: Huntington's diary indicates that Indians were being recruited to scatter all cattle ahead of the approaching U.S. army and any other wagon trains. This had nothing to do with attacking people.
  •  Quotes another author's opinion as if it were fact: the author here likely follows Will Bagley's Blood of the Prophets which likewise contains a serious misreading of Huntington's journal.

Response to claim: 159 - The author claims that Indians were not involved with the massacre; it was all Mormons

The author(s) of American Massacre make(s) the following claim:

The author claims that Indians were not involved with the massacre; it was all Mormons.

Author's sources:

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim is false

 Misrepresentation of source: "Denton has deceived the reader with the way she uses the Hurt report. The Indians' first report to Hurt, from Indians not affiliated with the Paiutes, was that Indians were not responsible. This is the only quotation Denton uses. But Hurt was suspicious, and he investigated further. He found and reported the truth. Indians and Mormons committed the atrocity. Yet, because Hurt's final conclusions don't square with Denton's thesis, we are not told about them." [4]


Notes

  1. Richard E. Turley Jr., "The Mountain Meadows Massacre," Ensign (September 2007): 14.off-site
  2. Robert D. Crockett, "The Denton Debacle (Review of: American Massacre: The Tragedy at Mountain Meadows, September 1857)," FARMS Review 16/1 (2004): 135–148. off-site
  3. Turley, Walker and Leonard, Massacre at Mountain Meadows, 124–125.
  4. Robert D. Crockett, "The Denton Debacle (Review of: American Massacre: The Tragedy at Mountain Meadows, September 1857)," FARMS Review 16/1 (2004): 135–148. off-site