Difference between revisions of "Template:WikipediaSecondaryFact"

(Corrected my dumb template mistake)
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-\[\[fr:[^:]+:[^\[]+\]\]\n +))
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
&nbsp;<font style="color: #c61010; background: #ffffc0">'''An author's opinion has been converted to fact'''&mdash; An opinion expressed by {{{author}}}, the author of a secondary source, is being portrayed in the article by editor {{{editor}}} as if it were a proven fact. {{link|url={{{wikilink}}} }}</font><br>
+
&nbsp;<font style="color: #c61010; background: #ffffc0">'''An author's opinion has been converted to fact'''&mdash; An opinion expressed by the author of a secondary source is being portrayed in the article as if it were a proven fact.<br>{{#If:{{{editor|}}}|Violated by <font style="color: #0000ff> <b>[[{{{editor}}}]]</b> </font><font style="color: #c61010>&mdash;Diff:</font> {{Link|url={{{wikipedialink}}} }} }}</font><br><noinclude>
 +
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 12:56, 6 June 2017

 An author's opinion has been converted to fact— An opinion expressed by the author of a secondary source is being portrayed in the article as if it were a proven fact.