FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Mormon responses to atheism"
m (→External links) |
m (→top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}) |
||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Main Page}} |
| − | == | + | <onlyinclude> |
| − | {{ | + | {{H1 |
| + | |L=Mormon responses to atheism | ||
| + | |H=Mormon responses to atheism | ||
| + | |S=These articles give different responses to criticisms of Latter-day Saint theology from the standpoint of religious skepticism, agnosticism, and atheism. | ||
| + | |L1=The Latter-day Saint Response to W.K. Clifford on Epistemic Responsibility | ||
| + | |L2=Philosophy and the Restored Gospel | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{:Mormonism/Atheism/Epistemic Responsibility}} | ||
| + | {{:Philosophy and the Restored Gospel}} | ||
| + | {{SummaryItem | ||
| + | |link=Holy Ghost/Burning in the bosom | ||
| + | |subject=Subjective revelation | ||
| + | |summary=Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie." | ||
| + | |L1=Question: Is a "burning in the bosom" simply a subjective, emotion-based, unreliable way to practice self-deception? | ||
| + | |L2=Question: Why do critics of Mormonism who belong to other religions discount spiritual experiences? | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{SummaryItem | ||
| + | |link=Atheism | ||
| + | |subject=Atheism | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | </onlyinclude> | ||
| + | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
| − | + | [[de:Antworten der Mormonen zum Atheismus]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 14:00, 13 April 2024
Mormon responses to atheism
Summary: These articles give different responses to criticisms of Latter-day Saint theology from the standpoint of religious skepticism, agnosticism, and atheism.
Jump to Subtopic:
- The Latter-day Saint Response to W.K. Clifford on Epistemic Responsibility
- Philosophy and the Restored Gospel
The Latter-day Saint Response to W.K. Clifford on Epistemic Responsibility
Summary: This article gives an overview of English mathematician and philosopher W.K. Clifford's contribution of epistemic responsibility within the philosophy of religion, ethics, and epistemology as well as the Latter-day Saint response to it.
Jump to details:
Advantages of Latter-day Saint Theology in Philosophy
Jump to details:
Subjective revelation
Summary: Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."Jump to Subtopic:
- Question: Is a "burning in the bosom" simply a subjective, emotion-based, unreliable way to practice self-deception?
- Question: Why do critics of Mormonism who belong to other religions discount spiritual experiences?