Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Presentism"

(header)
 
m (top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
+
{{Main Page}}
|title=[[../]]
+
{{H1
|author=Richard Abanes
+
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Presentism
|noauthor=
+
|H=''One Nation Under Gods'': Presentism
|section=Presentism
+
|S=
|previous=[[../Absurd claims|Absurd claims]]
+
|L1=
|next=
+
|T=[[../|One Nation Under Gods]]
|notes={{AuthorsDisclaimer}}
+
|A=Richard Abanes
 +
|<=[[../Absurd claims|Absurd claims]]
 +
|>=[[../Mind reading|Mind reading]]
 
}}
 
}}
=Presentism=
 
“Presentism” is an analytical fallacy in which past behavior is evaluated by modern standards or mores. 
 
  
“Presentism,” observed American Historical Association president Lynn Hunt, “at its worst, encourages a kind of moral complacency and self-congratulation. Interpreting the past in terms of present concerns usually leads us to find ourselves morally superior. . . . Our forbears constantly fail to measure up to our present-day standards.”{{ref|hunt1}}
+
<blockquote>
 +
''Presentism, at its worst, encourages a kind of moral complacency and self-congratulation. Interpreting the past in terms of present concerns usually leads us to find ourselves morally superior. . . . Our forbears constantly fail to measure up to our present-day standards.''
 +
<br>
 +
&mdash;Lynn Hunt, “Against Presentism,Perspectives 40/5 (May 2002) {{link|url=http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2002/0205/}}
 +
</blockquote>
 +
“Presentism” is an analytical fallacy in which past behavior is evaluated by modern standards or mores. The following are some of our favorite examples:
  
The following are some of our favorite examples:
+
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%; font-size:85%"
 +
!width="10%"|Page
 +
!width="90%"|''One Nation Under Gods''
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
====9-11====
 +
||"[T]he Smiths finally gave up on finding deliverance from their poverty by any means that might be termed legitimate employment. They turned instead to borrowing, fast-talking, and 'money-digging' through occult divination."
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
====27 (HB)====
 +
||Joseph engaged in "ritual magic and divination." 
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
====28 (HB)====
 +
||Joseph was a "money digger"
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
====29, 494n30 (HB)====
 +
||Joseph's father was "a firm believer in witchcraft and other supernatural things; and had brought up his family in the same belief." 
 +
|}

Latest revision as of 13:15, 13 April 2024

One Nation Under Gods: Presentism



A FAIR Analysis of: One Nation Under Gods, a work by author: Richard Abanes

Presentism, at its worst, encourages a kind of moral complacency and self-congratulation. Interpreting the past in terms of present concerns usually leads us to find ourselves morally superior. . . . Our forbears constantly fail to measure up to our present-day standards.
—Lynn Hunt, “Against Presentism,” Perspectives 40/5 (May 2002) off-site

“Presentism” is an analytical fallacy in which past behavior is evaluated by modern standards or mores. The following are some of our favorite examples:

Page One Nation Under Gods

9-11

"[T]he Smiths finally gave up on finding deliverance from their poverty by any means that might be termed legitimate employment. They turned instead to borrowing, fast-talking, and 'money-digging' through occult divination."

27 (HB)

Joseph engaged in "ritual magic and divination."

28 (HB)

Joseph was a "money digger"

29, 494n30 (HB)

Joseph's father was "a firm believer in witchcraft and other supernatural things; and had brought up his family in the same belief."