|
|
| (41 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | #REDIRECT[[Age of the Earth#Was Brigham Young a "young earth creationist"?]] |
| | | | |
| − | {{CreationPortal}}
| |
| − | ==Criticism==
| |
| − | Critics try to portray Brigham Young as a "young earth creationist" ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_earth_creationism YEC]). This is someone who believes the earth was created in the recent past, usually 6-7,000 years ago, based upon a literal and fundamentalist reading of Genesis.
| |
| | | | |
| − | They hope that by making Brigham appear uninformed about scientific matters, they can challenge his status as a prophet.
| + | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> |
| | | | |
| − | {{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS-Long}}
| + | [[es:Pregunta: ¿Brigham Young fue un "joven creacionista de la tierra"?]] |
| − | ===Source(s) of the criticism===
| + | [[Category:Questions]] |
| − | * {{CriticalWork:Smith:Nauvoo Polygamy|pages=277}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Response==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Whether or not a prophet knows how old the earth is says nothing about whether he can teach the truths about Jesus Christ necessary for salvation.
| |
| − | | |
| − | {{main|Official Church doctrine and statements by Church leaders}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | However, in this case, some critics have twisted the documentary sources to make Brigham Young say something that is completely the opposite of what he intended.
| |
| − | | |
| − | For example, George D. Smith writes that
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Brigham Young ridiculed geologists who "tell us that this earth has been in existence for thousands and missions of years."{{ref|gds1}} | |
| − | | |
| − | G. D. Smith quotes ''Journal of Discourses'', 12:271, for this assertion. He gets the citation wrong (it is at 14:115) but he might benefit from reading 12:271—it provides Brigham’s insistence that plural marriage had little to do with early persecution of Joseph and the church.
| |
| − | | |
| − | What did Brigham really say?
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Brigham in his own words===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The source cited says nothing of the kind. Brigham begins by remarking that he is not surprised that unbelief prevails, since apostate “religious teachers of the people advance many ideas and notions for truth which are in opposition to and contradict facts demonstrated by science.” To Brigham, this state of affairs creates a conflict in which men of science must reject truths discovered through science if they are to accept creedal Christianity. He then proceeds to give an example: “You take, for instance, our geologists, and they tell us that this earth has been in existence for thousands and millions of years. They think, and they have good reason for their faith, that their researches and investigations enable them to demonstrate that this earth has been in existence as long as they assert it has.”
| |
| − | | |
| − | There is no ridicule here: Brigham points out that geologists “have good reason” to believe that the earth is extremely old. “If the Lord, as religionists declare, made the earth out of nothing in six days, six thousand years ago,” Brigham has the geologists reply, “our studies are all vain; but by what we can learn from nature and the immutable laws of the Creator as revealed therein, we know that your theories are incorrect and consequently we must reject your religions as false and vain.”
| |
| − | | |
| − | Concludes Brigham, “In these respects we differ from the Christian world, for our religion will not clash with or contradict the facts of science in any particular. You may take geology, for instance, and it is a true science; not that I would say for a moment that all the conclusions and deductions of its professors are true, but its leading principles are.”{{ref|by1}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Conclusion==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Far from mocking those who accept an earth greater than six thousand years old, Brigham gives this idea his provisional approval and insists that while young earth creationism (as we would call it) may be a problem for traditional Christians, it is not a problem for the Latter-day Saints. It would have been hard to distort Brigham any further than G. D. Smith has done.
| |
| − | | |
| − | {{NoOfficial}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Endnotes==
| |
| − | #{{note|gds1}} Smith, ''Nauvoo Polygamy'', 277.
| |
| − | #{{note|by1}} {{JoD14_1|author=Brigham Young|title=Attending Meetings—Religion & Science—Geology—The Creation|start=115–16|date=14 May 1871}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Further reading==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===FAIR wiki articles===
| |
| − | {{evolutionwiki}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===FAIR web site===
| |
| − | {{evolutionfair}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===External links===
| |
| − | {{evolutionlinks}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Printed material===
| |
| − | {{evolutionprinted}}
| |
