|
|
| (50 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{JesusChristPortal}} | + | {{Main Page}} |
| − | {{question}} | + | <onlyinclude> |
| | + | {{H2 |
| | + | |L=Jesus Christ/Was Jesus married |
| | + | |H=Mormonism and the question of whether or not Jesus Christ was married |
| | + | |S= |
| | + | |L1=Question: Do Mormons believe Jesus Christ was married? |
| | + | |L2=Dale Bills (Church spokesman, 2006): "The belief that Christ was married has never been official church doctrine" |
| | + | |L3=Charles Penrose (1912): "We do not know anything about Jesus Christ being married" |
| | + | |L4=Question: Do Mormons believe Jesus Christ was a polygamist? |
| | + | }} |
| | + | <onlyinclude> |
| | + | {{:Question: Do Mormons believe Jesus Christ was married?}} |
| | + | {{:Source:Church spokesman:2006:The belief that Christ was married has never been official church doctrine}} |
| | + | {{:Source:Penrose:Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered:Improvement Era:Sept 1912:We do not know anything about Jesus Christ being married}} |
| | + | {{:Question: Do Mormons believe Jesus Christ was a polygamist?}} |
| | | | |
| − | ==Question==
| + | {{NoOfficial}} |
| − | Do Mormons believe Jesus Christ was married?
| + | </onlyinclude> |
| | + | {{Critical sources box:Jesus Christ/Was Jesus married/CriticalSources}} |
| | + | {{endnotes sources}} |
| | + | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> |
| | | | |
| − | ==Answer==
| + | [[de:Jesus Christus/War Jesus verheiratet?]] |
| − | | |
| − | The easy answer is that no, Mormons don't officially believe that Jesus was married. In fact, there is no official Church doctrine on this issue. Individual members are free to believe as they wish concerning this matter. (Some believe that He was married; others believe He wasn't. Most members are open to belief either way.)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ===Early LDS views===
| |
| − | Several early LDS leaders believed Jesus was married, and said so from the pulpit on occasion. Here is one example from Apostle Orson Hyde:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Now there was actually a marriage [at Cana ([http://scriptures.lds.org/john/2/1-11#1 John 2:1–11])]; and if Jesus was not the bridegroom on that occasion, please tell who was. If any man can show this, and prove that it was not the Savior of the world, then I will acknowledge I am in error. We say it was Jesus Christ who was married, to be brought into the relation whereby he could see his seed ([http://scriptures.lds.org/isa/53/10#10 Isaiah 53:10]), before he was crucified. "Has he indeed passed by the nature of angels, and taken upon himself the seed of Abraham, to die without leaving a seed to bear his name on the earth?" No. But when the secret is fully out, the seed of the blessed shall be gathered in, in the last days; and he who has not the blood of Abraham flowing in his veins, who has not one particle of the Savior's in him, I am afraid is a stereotyped Gentile, who will be left out and not be gathered in the last days; for I tell you it is the chosen of God, the seed of the blessed, that shall be gathered. I do not despise to be called a son of Abraham, if he had a dozen wives; or to be called a brother, a son, a child of the Savior, if he had Mary, and Martha, and several others, as wives; and though he did cast seven devils out of one of them, it is all the same to me.{{ref|hyde}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ===Later views===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Joseph Fielding Smith apparently believed that Jesus had been married, and that He had children. In a 1963 letter to Elder Smith (then President of the Quorum of the Twelve), J. Ricks Smith asked for clarification on a question he had concerning the marital and paternal status of Jesus:
| |
| − | | |
| − | Burbank, California
| |
| − | March 17, 1963
| |
| − |
| |
| − | President Joseph Fielding Smith
| |
| − | 47 East South Temple Street
| |
| − | Salt Lake City 11, Utah
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Dear President Smith:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In a discussion recently, the question arose, "Was Christ married?" The
| |
| − | quote of Isaiah 53:10 was given, which reads,
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath put Him to grief:
| |
| − | when thou shalt make his soul and offering for sin, he shall see
| |
| − | His seed, he shall prolong His days, and the pleasure of the Lord
| |
| − | shall prosper in his hand.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | What is meant by "he shall see his seed"? Does this mean that Christ had
| |
| − | children?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In the Temple ceremony we are told that only through Temple marriage can
| |
| − | we receive the highest degree of exaltation and dwell in the presence of
| |
| − | our Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ. Christ came here to set us the
| |
| − | example and, therefore, we believe that he must have been marred. Are we
| |
| − | right?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Sincerely,
| |
| − |
| |
| − | J. Ricks Smith
| |
| − | 1736 N. Ontario Street
| |
| − | Burbank, California
| |
| − | | |
| − | In a written response (on the same letter), Elder Smith indicated his feelings on the matter—both in the positive. Placing an asterisk next to the words "His seed" in the letter, at the bottom of the letter Elder Smith wrote:
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Mosiah 15:10-12 '''Please''' Read Your Book of Mormon!
| |
| − | | |
| − | Placing two asterisks next to the words "he must have been married," at the bottom of the letter Elder Smith wrote:
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Yes! But do not preach it! The Lord advised us not to cast pearls before swine!
| |
| − | | |
| − | Apparently Elder Smith believed that the married state of Jesus was true, but that it should not be preached to others.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ===Official doctrine?===
| |
| − | Even though several leaders have expressed positive opinions on the subject, there has never been any revelation or official statement on the subject on behalf of the Church.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Dale Bills, a spokesman for the Church, said in a statement released Tuesday, 16 May 2006:
| |
| − | :The belief that Christ was married has never been official church doctrine. It is neither sanctioned nor taught by the church. While it is true that a few church leaders in the mid-1800s expressed their opinions on the matter, it was not then, and is not now, church doctrine.{{ref|bills}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Conclusion==
| |
| − | The Bible is silent on the issue of Jesus' marital state, and there has been no modern revelation stating he was or was not married. This leaves the issue an open question. Some Latter-day Saints believe he was married, but the Church has no position on the subject.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Endnotes==
| |
| − | #{{note|hyde}}Address given at General Conference, Salt Lake City, 6 October 1854; [http://journalofdiscourses.org/Vol_02/refJDvol2-19.html ''Journal of Discourses'' 2:82]. Elder Hyde's interpretation of Isaiah 53:10 is at variance with the one given in the Book of Mormon. Abinadi taught that the prophets and those who believe the words of the prophets are Jesus' seed ({{s||Mosiah|15|10-13}}).
| |
| − | #{{note|bills}}"LDS do not endorse claims in 'Da Vinci'," ''Deseret News,'' 17 May 2006; ([http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1,1249,635208214,00.html Link]). See also "Book's premise not so shocking to LDS," ''The Salt Lake Tribune,'' 19 May 2006; ([http://www.sltrib.com/faith/ci_3844431 Link]).
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Further reading==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===FAIR wiki articles===
| |
| − | *[[General authorities' statements as scripture]]
| |
| − | *[[Journal of Discourses]]
| |
| − | {{JesusWiki}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===FAIR web site===
| |
| − | *{{tg|url=http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai224.html|topic=Jesus Married}}
| |
| − | <!--
| |
| − | ===External links===
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ===Printed material===
| |
| − | -->
| |
Mormonism and the question of whether or not Jesus Christ was married
Jump to details:
Question: Do Latter-day Saints believe Jesus Christ was married?
Mormons don't officially believe that Jesus was married
The easy answer is that no, Mormons don't officially believe that Jesus was married. In fact, there is no official Church doctrine on this issue. Individual members are free to believe as they wish concerning this matter. (Some believe that He was married; others believe He wasn't. Most members are open to believe either way.)
Do many Latter-day Saints believe that Jesus was married?
Since eternal marriage is one of the ordinances required to achieve exaltation, many Latter-day Saints do indeed believe that Jesus Christ was married. The question is: What is it about Jesus being married that would make Him less of our Lord and Savior? Yet, Latter-day Saints are accused of not being Christian because of such beliefs.
William Phipps, Professor of Religion and Philosophy at Davis and Elkins College in West Virginia, wrote an article and a book declaring his belief that the Lord Jesus Christ was married.[1] Are all Presbyterians not Christians on account of Reverend Phipps' beliefs, or do different standards exist for Evangelicals than for those "Satanic cultists," the "Mormons?" Perhaps those who make such accusations would counter that it is just Phipps who is not a Christian, on account of his belief that Jesus Christ was married. But again, why would they damn all Latter-day Saints because some Latter-day Saints believe something that is not official LDS doctrine?
The Bible is silent on the issue of Jesus' marital state
The Bible is silent on the issue of Jesus' marital state, and there has been no modern revelation stating he was or was not married. This leaves the issue an open question. Some Latter-day Saints believe he was married, but the Church has no position on the subject. This question was addressed by Charles W. Penrose in the September 1912 issue of the official Church magazine, the Improvement Era:
Question 2: Do you believe that Jesus was married?
Answer: We do not know anything about Jesus Christ being married. The Church has no authoritative declaration on the subject. [2]
Several early Latter-day Saint leaders believed Jesus was married and preached this from the pulpit
Several early LDS leaders believed Jesus was married, and said so from the pulpit on occasion. Here is one example from Apostle Orson Hyde:
Now there was actually a marriage [at Cana (John 2:1–11)]; and if Jesus was not the bridegroom on that occasion, please tell who was. If any man can show this, and prove that it was not the Savior of the world, then I will acknowledge I am in error. We say it was Jesus Christ who was married, to be brought into the relation whereby he could see his seed (Isaiah 53:10), before he was crucified. "Has he indeed passed by the nature of angels, and taken upon himself the seed of Abraham, to die without leaving a seed to bear his name on the earth?" No. But when the secret is fully out, the seed of the blessed shall be gathered in, in the last days; and he who has not the blood of Abraham flowing in his veins, who has not one particle of the Savior's in him, I am afraid is a stereotyped Gentile, who will be left out and not be gathered in the last days; for I tell you it is the chosen of God, the seed of the blessed, that shall be gathered. I do not despise to be called a son of Abraham, if he had a dozen wives; or to be called a brother, a son, a child of the Savior, if he had Mary, and Martha, and several others, as wives; and though he did cast seven devils out of one of them, it is all the same to me. [3]
Joseph Fielding Smith apparently believed that Jesus had been married
Joseph Fielding Smith apparently believed that Jesus had been married, and that He had children. In a 1963 letter to Elder Smith (then President of the Quorum of the Twelve), J. Ricks Smith asked for clarification on a question he had concerning the marital and paternal status of Jesus:
Burbank, California
March 17, 1963
President Joseph Fielding Smith
47 East South Temple Street
Salt Lake City 11, Utah
Dear President Smith:
In a discussion recently, the question arose, "Was Christ married?" The
quote of Isaiah 53:10 was given, which reads,
Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath put Him to grief:
when thou shalt make his soul and offering for sin, he shall see
His seed, he shall prolong His days, and the pleasure of the Lord
shall prosper in his hand.
What is meant by "he shall see his seed"? Does this mean that Christ had
children?
In the Temple ceremony we are told that only through Temple marriage can
we receive the highest degree of exaltation and dwell in the presence of
our Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ. Christ came here to set us the
example and, therefore, we believe that he must have been married. Are we
right?
Sincerely,
J. Ricks Smith
1736 N. Ontario Street
Burbank, California
In a written response (on the same letter), Elder Smith indicated his feelings on the matter—both in the positive. Placing an asterisk next to the words "His seed" in the letter, at the bottom of the letter Elder Smith wrote:
*Mosiah 15:10-12 Please Read Your Book of Mormon!
Placing two asterisks next to the words "he must have been married," at the bottom of the letter Elder Smith wrote:
**Yes! But do not preach it! The Lord advised us not to cast pearls before swine!
Apparently Elder Smith believed that the married state of Jesus was true, but that it should not be preached to others.
There has never been any revelation or official statement on the subject on behalf of the Church
Even though several leaders have expressed positive opinions on the subject, there has never been any revelation or official statement on the subject on behalf of the Church.
Dale Bills, a spokesman for the Church, said in a statement released Tuesday, 16 May 2006:
The belief that Christ was married has never been official church doctrine. It is neither sanctioned nor taught by the church. While it is true that a few church leaders in the mid-1800s expressed their opinions on the matter, it was not then, and is not now, church doctrine. [4]
Dale Bills (Church spokesman, 2006): "The belief that Christ was married has never been official church doctrine"
Dale Bills, a spokesman for the Church:
The belief that Christ was married has never been official church doctrine. It is neither sanctioned nor taught by the church. While it is true that a few church leaders in the mid-1800s expressed their opinions on the matter, it was not then, and is not now, church doctrine. [5]
Charles Penrose (1912): "We do not know anything about Jesus Christ being married"
Charles W. Penrose:
Question 2: Do you believe that Jesus was married?
Answer: We do not know anything about Jesus Christ being married. The Church has no authoritative declaration on the subject. [6]
Question: Do Mormons believe Jesus Christ was a polygamist?
There is no official doctrine regarding Jesus' marital state
The Bible is silent on the issue of Jesus' (or the Father's) marital state, and there has been no modern revelation stating he was or was not married. This leaves the issue an open question. Jesus' purported polygamy plays little if any role in present-day LDS discourse.
Therefore, the easy answer is that no, Latter-day Saint doctrine does not teach that Jesus was married, polygamist or otherwise. In fact, there is no official Church doctrine on this issue. Members are free to believe as they wish concerning this matter.
The Church does not take an official position on this issue
Statements about matters about which there is no official doctrine
J. Reuben Clark |
This is one of many issues about which the Church has no official position. As President J. Reuben Clark taught under assignment from the First Presidency:
- Here we must have in mind—must know—that only the President of the Church, the Presiding High Priest, is sustained as Prophet, Seer, and Revelator for the Church, and he alone has the right to receive revelations for the Church, either new or amendatory, or to give authoritative interpretations of scriptures that shall be binding on the Church....
- When any man, except the President of the Church, undertakes to proclaim one unsettled doctrine, as among two or more doctrines in dispute, as the settled doctrine of the Church, we may know that he is not "moved upon by the Holy Ghost," unless he is acting under the direction and by the authority of the President.
- Of these things we may have a confident assurance without chance for doubt or quibbling.[7]
|
Harold B. Lee |
Harold B. Lee was emphatic that only one person can speak for the Church:
- All over the Church you're being asked this: "What does the Church think about this or that?" Have you ever heard anybody ask that question? "What does the Church think about the civil rights legislation?" "What do they think about the war?" "What do they think about drinking Coca-Cola or Sanka coffee?" Did you ever hear that? "What do they think about the Democratic Party or ticket or the Republican ticket?" Did you ever hear that? "How should we vote in this forthcoming election?" Now, with most all of those questions, if you answer them, you're going to be in trouble. Most all of them. Now, it's the smart man that will say, "There's only one man in this church that speaks for the Church, and I'm not that one man."
- I think nothing could get you into deep water quicker than to answer people on these things, when they say, "What does the Church think?" and you want to be smart, so you try to answer what the Church's policy is. Well, you're not the one to make the policies for the Church. You just remember what the Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians. He said, "For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified" (1 Corinthians 2:2). Well now, as teachers of our youth, you're not supposed to know anything except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. On that subject you're expected to be an expert. You're expected to know your subject. You're expected to have a testimony. And in that you'll have great strength. If the President of the Church has not declared the position of the Church, then you shouldn't go shopping for the answer.[8]
|
First Presidency |
This was recently reiterated by the First Presidency (who now approves all statements published on the Church's official website):
- Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church. With divine inspiration, the First Presidency...and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles...counsel together to establish doctrine that is consistently proclaimed in official Church publications. This doctrine resides in the four “standard works” of scripture (the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price), official declarations and proclamations, and the Articles of Faith. Isolated statements are often taken out of context, leaving their original meaning distorted.[9]
In response to a letter "received at the office of the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" in 1912, Charles W. Penrose of the First Presidency wrote:
- Question 14: Do you believe that the President of the Church, when speaking to the Church in his official capacity is infallible?
- Answer: We do not believe in the infallibility of man. When God reveals anything it is truth, and truth is infallible. No President of the Church has claimed infallibility.[10]
There is more material on official doctrine in the Church in this link. |
References |
Notes
- ↑ William Phipps, "The Case for a Married Jesus," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 7 no. 4 (1972), 44-49., and William Phipps, Was Jesus Married? The Distortion of Sexuality in the Christian Tradition (New York: Harper and Row, 1970).
- ↑ Charles W. Penrose, "Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered," Improvement Era 15 no. 11 (September 1912).
- ↑ (6 October 1854) Journal of Discourses 2:82. Elder Hyde's interpretation of Isaiah 53:10 is at variance with the one given in the Book of Mormon. Abinadi taught that the prophets and those who believe the words of the prophets are Jesus' seed (Mosiah 15꞉10-13).
- ↑ "LDS do not endorse claims in 'Da Vinci'," Deseret News, 17 May 2006; (Link). See also "Book's premise not so shocking to LDS," The Salt Lake Tribune, 19 May 2006; (Link).
- ↑ "LDS do not endorse claims in 'Da Vinci'," Deseret News, 17 May 2006; (Link). See also "Book's premise not so shocking to LDS," The Salt Lake Tribune, 19 May 2006; (Link).
- ↑ Charles W. Penrose, "Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered," Improvement Era 15 no. 11 (September 1912).
- ↑ J. Reuben Clark, Jr., "Church Leaders and the Scriptures," [original title "When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture?"] Immortality and Eternal Life: Reflections from the Writings and Messages of President J. Reuben Clark, Jr., Vol, 2, (1969-70): 221; address to Seminary and Institute Teachers, BYU (7 July 1954); reproduced in Church News (31 July 1954); also reprinted in Dialogue 12/2 (Summer 1979): 68–81.
- ↑ Harold B. Lee, Teachings of Harold B. Lee (Salt Lake City, Utah: Bookcraft, 1996), 445.
- ↑ LDS Newsroom, "Approaching Mormon Doctrine," lds.org (4 May 2007)
- ↑ Charles W. Penrose, "Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered," Improvement Era 15 no. 11 (September 1912).
|
Source(s) of the criticism
Critical sources |
- Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson, Mormonism 101. Examining the Religion of the Latter-day Saints (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2000), Chapter 2. ( Index of claims )
- Richard N. and Joan K. Ostling, Mormon America: The Power and the Promise, (New York:HarperCollins Publishers, 2000), 160. ( Index of claims )
- Contender Ministries, Questions All Mormons Should Ask Themselves. Answers
- Watchman Fellowship, The Watchman Expositor (Page 2)
|
Notes
