FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Passing the Heavenly Gift"
m (→top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{Main Page}} |
{{H1 | {{H1 | ||
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Passing the Heavenly Gift | |L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Passing the Heavenly Gift | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|A=Denver C. Snuffer | |A=Denver C. Snuffer | ||
|<= | |<= | ||
− | |>=[[/Introduction|Introduction]] | + | |>=[[/Introduction|Introduction to the volume's claims]] |
}} | }} | ||
<onlyinclude> | <onlyinclude> | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|L11=Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Appendix 1 & 2—Comparing the size and cost of the Kirtland and Nauvoo temples | |L11=Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Appendix 1 & 2—Comparing the size and cost of the Kirtland and Nauvoo temples | ||
|L12=Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture, "Passing Up The Heavenly Gift (Part One of Two)" | |L12=Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture, "Passing Up The Heavenly Gift (Part One of Two)" | ||
+ | |L13=Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture, "Passing Up The Heavenly Gift (Part Two of Two)" | ||
+ | |L14=Reviews of this work | ||
}} | }} | ||
</onlyinclude> | </onlyinclude> | ||
Line 72: | Line 74: | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | =Reviews of this work= | + | ==Reviews of this work== |
* {{GLS-Paper-Snuffer-1}} | * {{GLS-Paper-Snuffer-1}} | ||
* {{GLS-Paper-Snuffer-2}} | * {{GLS-Paper-Snuffer-2}} |
Latest revision as of 13:17, 13 April 2024
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift
A FAIR Analysis of: Passing the Heavenly Gift, a work by author: Denver C. Snuffer
|
Introduction to the volume's claims |
Response to claims made in Passing the Heavenly Gift by Denver C. Snuffer
Summary: This account of Church history contains numerous inaccuracies, distortions, and misrepresentations of the data.
Jump to details:
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Introduction to the volume's claims
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims about priesthood ordination
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims about Brigham Young and apostles not being witnesses of Christ
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims regarding source of Brigham Young and apostles' authority after Joseph Smith's death
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims regarding when Joseph Smith received priesthood authority
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims that authority could only be transmitted in a completed temple
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims that the Saints sinned and Joseph gave his life
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims that the Saints did not build the Nauvoo Temple quickly enough
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims that the Saints in Nauvoo were punished because they were slothful in building the temple
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Response to claims made in Conclusion
- Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Appendix 1 & 2—Comparing the size and cost of the Kirtland and Nauvoo temples
- Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture, "Passing Up The Heavenly Gift (Part One of Two)"
- Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture, "Passing Up The Heavenly Gift (Part Two of Two)"
- Reviews of this work
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Introduction to the volume's claims
Jump to details:
- The central thesis
- Prophecy and historical claims
- Summary of Snuffer’s historical reconstruction
- Snuffer’s Conclusion
- Snuffer's visionary claims
- Lawyer, not historian
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims about priesthood ordination
Jump to details:
- Response to claim: Priesthood conferred by ordination is just a potential and not actual bestowal of power
- Response to claim: Power versus authority of the priesthood
- Response to claim: Authority not vital for ordinances
- Response to claim: Legal Administrators
- Response to claim: To truly receive priesthood power, a type of divine theophany is necessary
- Response to claim: Could Brigham Young Qualify to Claim Sealing Power?
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims about Brigham Young and apostles not being witnesses of Christ
Jump to details:
- Apostles as personal witnesses of Christ
- Question: Did any nineteenth century leader after Joseph Smith report divine visions?
- Question: Did any twentieth century leader after Joseph Smith report divine visions?
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims regarding source of Brigham Young and apostles' authority after Joseph Smith's death
Jump to details:
- Snuffer's views on the source of the authority of Brigham Young and the apostles after Joseph’s death
- An incomplete and misleading citation
- Earlier claims made by Brigham Young and the Twelve
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims regarding when Joseph Smith received priesthood authority
Jump to details:
- Is it true that Joseph received sealing authority in 1829?
- Date of plural marriage revelation(s) and implementation
- Elijah and the sealing keys
- Joseph Smith’s Nauvoo era teachings about Elijah
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims that authority could only be transmitted in a completed temple
Jump to details:
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims that Joseph Smith had to offer his life because the Saints sinned
Jump to details:
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims that the Saints did not build the Nauvoo Temple quickly enough
Jump to details:
- Is it true that the Nauvoo temple was not built with enough speed?
- Joseph’s discourses in the relevant period
- How much time were the Saints given to build the temple?
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Claims that the Saints in Nauvoo were punished because they were slothful in building the temple
Jump to details:
- Were the Saints at Nauvoo were punished for slothfulness in building the temple?
- Response to claim: The spot for the temple was not consecrated by the Lord, or made holy by His or the angels’ presence
- Response to claim: The church was moved out of the spot
- Response to claim: The temple was utterly destroyed
- Response to claim: Suffering during the exodus from Nauvoo
- Response to claim: No Pentecost-type experiences in the Nauvoo temple?
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Response to claims made in Conclusion
Jump to details:
- High road to apostasy
- "Proud descendants of Nauvoo"
- Snuffer announces his excommunication for apostasy
- Disdain for rank-and-file members
- Disdain for modern apostles
- Snuffer and D. Michael Quinn on David O. McKay
- A closed mental system
Response to Passing the Heavenly Gift: Appendix 1 & 2—Comparing the size and cost of the Kirtland and Nauvoo temples
Jump to details:
Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, "Passing Up The Heavenly Gift (Part One of Two)"
Gregory L. Smith, Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, (2013)Denver C. Snuffer, Jr. claims to have had a vision of the resurrected Jesus Christ.2 A convert to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, he is the author of eight books (509). The thesis of the most recent—Passing the Heavenly Gift—is summarized by his book’s cover photo: a snuffed out candle, smoke curling upward, with a dim ember persisting at the tip of the wick.Snuffer claims that Joseph Smith was an inspired prophet, but Joseph’s commands and revelations were not heeded adequately. As a result, Joseph was betrayed by Church members and murdered prior to the completion of the Nauvoo Temple (104). This made it impossible, in Snuffer’s view, for Joseph to pass on all the necessary ordinances and doctrines, notwithstanding the endowment and other ordinances given to the Twelve prior to Joseph’s death (105–110). Brigham Young, the Twelve, and their ecclesiastical heirs did not, therefore, perpetuate the fullness of Joseph’s mission (87–89, 268, 272–276, 283). Some of their acts, and the changes that Snuffer believes they have made to Church doctrine, practice, or administration, were not sanctioned by God, and constitute the “passing of the heavenly gift” (287, 400). This loss was, in Snuffer’s telling, predicted by Joseph Smith, and the time is now ripe for members of the Church to reclaim these blessings (315–317, 400–402, 447–499).
Click here to view the complete article
Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, "Passing Up The Heavenly Gift (Part Two of Two)"
Gregory L. Smith, Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, (2013)Snuffer writes of the apostolic succession:Snuffer then delivers his killing stroke: “This explanation is misleading because Brigham Young was not ordained an Apostle by Joseph Smith” (87). A few pages later, he writes that “Brigham Young’s claim to have received the sealing power when he was ordained an Apostle is completely dependent on the Three Witnesses’ ordination in 1835. That ordination came a year prior to the 1836 visit of Elijah” (91).In 1847, Brigham Young publicly explained his understanding of the keys he obtained in these words: “an apostle is the Highest office and authority that there is in the Church and Kingdom [of] God on the earth. From whom did Joseph receive his authority? From just such men as sit around me here (pointing to the Twelve Apostles that sat with him.) Peter, James and John were Apostles, and there was no noise about their being seers and revelators though those gifts were among them. Joseph Smith gave unto me and my brethren (the Twelve) all the Priesthood keys, power and authority which he had and those are the powers which belong to the Apostleship” (87).
Click here to view the complete article
Reviews of this work
- Gregory L. Smith, "Passing Up The Heavenly Gift (Part One of Two)," Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship7(2013): 181–243.
- Gregory L. Smith, "Passing Up The Heavenly Gift (Part Two of Two)," Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship7(2013): 245–341.
Notes