|
|
| (43 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {| style="margin: 0em 0em 0em 0em; border: 0px; align="right" cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
| + | #REDIRECT [[Question: Does the fact that the Doctrine and Covenants refers to North American Indians as "Lamanites" contradict the theory that the Book of Mormon events took place in Mesoamerica?]] |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{DNAPortal}}
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | {{GeographyPortal}}
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | {{question}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Question==
| |
| − | Since in the Doctrine and Covenants God refers to American Indians in North America as "Lamanites" (e.g., {{s||DC|28|8-9,14}}, {{s||DC|30|6}}, {{s||DC|32|2}},{{s||DC|54|8}}) does this cause problems for the Limited Geography Theory ([[Book_of_Mormon_geography:New_World:LGT|LGT]]) or issues of Amerindian genetic data?
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Response==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===LGT theory and the D&C===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The LGT assumes that a small number of Lehites were introduced into a larger "sea" of native peoples, most of whom were of presumably Asiatic origin. Critics mistake the use of the term "Lamanite" as requiring descent from Lehi. But, from very early in the Book of Mormon record, it is clear that the term "Lamanite" does not refer to descent, but to political and religious affiliation:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :...I shall call them Lamanites that seek to destroy the people of Nephi, and those who are friendly to Nephi I shall call Nephites, or the people of Nephi, according to the reigns of the kings.({{s||Jacob|1|14}})
| |
| − | | |
| − | So, any person who wasn’t a Nephite was, by exclusion, a Lamanite. Lamanites are ''not'' confined in any geographic sense at all. The LGT holds that the story of the Book of Mormon and the peoples with which it is concerned were confined to a narrow region, since this is all the area with which the authors of the Book of Mormon were directly concerned. Yet the Book of Mormon has several references that suggest a knowledge and interaction with a much greater geographical area. The story of Hagoth found in Alma 63 speaks not only of the shipbuilder and his movements northward (out of the general area referred to in the Book of Mormon) but also others that migrated to the north. In Helaman 3 we find other references to people migrating to the north;
| |
| − | | |
| − | 3 And it came to pass in the forty and sixth, yea, there was much contention and many dissensions; in the which there were an exceedingly great many who departed out of the land of Zarahemla, and went forth unto the land northward to inherit the land.
| |
| − | 4 And they did travel to an exceedingly great distance, insomuch that they came to large bodies of water and many rivers.
| |
| − | 5 Yea, and even they did spread forth into all parts of the land, into whatever parts it had not been rendered desolate and without timber, because of the many inhabitants who had before inherited the land.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The migration was our to the general area of the Book of Mormon story and is referred to as "an exceedingly great distance." This gives opportunity for Lamanites and Nephites to be found in all parts of the western hemisphere. There is no reason to believe that similar migrations were to the south and were more common that are recorded in the gtext.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The situation in the 19th century was different than the state of affairs a millenium and a half earlier, when the Book of Mormon was written (i.e., about 400 AD at the latest). By Joseph Smith’s era, if Lehi left ''any'' descendants at all, then ''every single person in the hemisphere'' was a descendant of Lehi. (''For further information about the population genetics, see FAIR Wiki article on [[Amerindians_as_Lamanites|Amerindians as Lamanites]], especially [[Amerindians_as_Lamanites#All_From_Lehi|all modern Amerindians from Lehi]].'')
| |
| − | | |
| − | This doesn’t mean that they got the majority of their DNA from him, or that one would likely be so spectacularly lucky as to find a genetic marker from him—but, they would be literal descendants in some sense, and probably all have predominantly Asian DNA markers.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Confusion over the nature of quotations found in the Doctrine & Covenants===
| |
| − | | |
| − | We must not make the mistake of assuming that D&C revelations in which Joseph Smith speaks in “God’s voice” are to be seen as direct “quotations” from God. Joseph didn’t claim to be hearing a voice, and he didn’t claim to be quoting God or taking dictation. Rather, impressions would come to him, which he would put into words. Joseph clearly did not consider them “direct quotations” from God, since he was quite happy to revise them, edit them later, etc. This would be strange if Joseph saw them as “direct quotes,” not so strange when we understand how he saw the matter.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Many members of the Church assume differently because of the way they’re worded.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Conclusion==
| |
| − | | |
| − | By the time the Doctrine and Covenants was written, Lehi's descendants had ample time to migrate and intermarry with the large number of "natives" postulated by the LGT. Such descendants are "Lamanites" in at least three senses:
| |
| − | # all shared descent from Lehi, to some degree
| |
| − | # none embraced Nephite kingship or their doctrine of Christ, making them "Lamanites" politically
| |
| − | # all were eligible for the covenant blessings promised to Lehi's descendants, if they would repent.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Further reading==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===FAIR wiki articles===
| |
| − | {{BoMGeographyWiki}}
| |
| − | {{DNAWiki}}
| |
| − | {{DCWiki}}
| |
| − | ===FAIR web site===
| |
| − | {{DNAFAIR}}
| |
| − | {{DCFAIR}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===External links===
| |
| − | {{DNALinks}}
| |
| − | {{DCLinks}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Printed material===
| |
| − | {{DNAPrint}}
| |
| − | {{DCPrint}}
| |
