![FairMormon Logo](https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2021_fair_logo_primary.png)
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
m (→top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{Main Page}} |
{{H1 | {{H1 | ||
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith/Chapter 19 | |L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith/Chapter 19 | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
When recounting his history, Joseph's "dream images came easily to him and with such intense color and luxuriant detail that the matter of accuracy or chronology was of no importance." | When recounting his history, Joseph's "dream images came easily to him and with such intense color and luxuriant detail that the matter of accuracy or chronology was of no importance." | ||
− | |authorsources= | + | |authorsources=<br> |
− | Author's conjecture. | + | #Author's conjecture. |
}} | }} | ||
{{propaganda|This is the author's imaginative attempt to deduce Joseph Smith's thoughts and dreams. | {{propaganda|This is the author's imaginative attempt to deduce Joseph Smith's thoughts and dreams. | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Everything in Joseph's past was reinterpreted to "enhance the glory of the present." | Everything in Joseph's past was reinterpreted to "enhance the glory of the present." | ||
− | |authorsources= | + | |authorsources=<br> |
− | }} | + | #}} |
{{propaganda|This is simply the author's conjecture. | {{propaganda|This is simply the author's conjecture. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
The Book of Mormon was a "secret source of worry" to Joseph, and in response he published extracts from ''View of the Hebrews,'' ''Wonders of Nature,'' and other books that supported the Book of Mormon's story. | The Book of Mormon was a "secret source of worry" to Joseph, and in response he published extracts from ''View of the Hebrews,'' ''Wonders of Nature,'' and other books that supported the Book of Mormon's story. | ||
− | |authorsources= | + | |authorsources=<br> |
− | }} | + | #}} |
{{propaganda|This is simply the author's conjecture regarding why Joseph published extracts from books that she believes he plagiarized. | {{propaganda|This is simply the author's conjecture regarding why Joseph published extracts from books that she believes he plagiarized. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Joseph said regarding the Book of Mormon manuscript that he had "had trouble enough with this thing." | Joseph said regarding the Book of Mormon manuscript that he had "had trouble enough with this thing." | ||
− | |authorsources= | + | |authorsources=<br> |
− | ''The Return'' 2:315 (Aug. 1890) | + | #''The Return'' 2:315 (Aug. 1890) |
}} | }} | ||
{{propaganda|This quote is only available from a hostile source, and there is no other record of Joseph making this remark. This quote is only known from the hostile Ebenezer Robinson's account of Joseph placing the printer's manuscript of the Book of Mormon in the cornerstone of the Nauvoo house. There is no contemporary record of Joseph making this remark. If he did so, it could be seen in a variety of ways—including a rather rueful, somewhat humorous acknowledgment that the Book of Mormon had brought persecution upon him. | {{propaganda|This quote is only available from a hostile source, and there is no other record of Joseph making this remark. This quote is only known from the hostile Ebenezer Robinson's account of Joseph placing the printer's manuscript of the Book of Mormon in the cornerstone of the Nauvoo house. There is no contemporary record of Joseph making this remark. If he did so, it could be seen in a variety of ways—including a rather rueful, somewhat humorous acknowledgment that the Book of Mormon had brought persecution upon him. | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Joseph Smith claimed that the word "Mormon" meant "more good." | Joseph Smith claimed that the word "Mormon" meant "more good." | ||
− | |authorsources= | + | |authorsources=<br> |
− | ''Times and Seasons'' 4:194 (May 15, 1843) | + | #''Times and Seasons'' 4:194 (May 15, 1843) |
}} | }} | ||
{{information|This is correct. Joseph said this. Joseph Smith said, | {{information|This is correct. Joseph said this. Joseph Smith said, | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Much of the endowment ritual was borrowed from the Freemasons. | Much of the endowment ritual was borrowed from the Freemasons. | ||
− | |authorsources= | + | |authorsources=<br> |
− | Author's conjecture. | + | #Author's conjecture. |
}} | }} | ||
{{propaganda|This is an assumption on the part of the author. | {{propaganda|This is an assumption on the part of the author. | ||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
}} | }} | ||
*[[Temples/Endowment/Freemasonry]] | *[[Temples/Endowment/Freemasonry]] | ||
− | |authorsources= | + | |authorsources=<br> |
− | + | # {{attn}} | |
}} --> | }} --> | ||
Claims made in "Chapter 18: Nauvoo" | A FAIR Analysis of: No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith, a work by author: Fawn Brodie
|
Claims made in "Chapter 20: In the Quiver of the Almighty" |
Claim Evaluation |
No Man Knows My History |
![]() |
Jump to details:
When recounting his history, Joseph's "dream images came easily to him and with such intense color and luxuriant detail that the matter of accuracy or chronology was of no importance."Author's sources:
- Author's conjecture.
Secular critics face a tough challenge when attempting to explain the foundational stories of Church—the primary sources from Joseph Smith and his associates do not provide them with any useful information. The only explanation left to them is that Joseph must have been lying about everything that he said. Authors then resort to fabricating Joseph's thoughts and dreams, and deducing his motivations based upon his surroundings. As one reviewer of Vogel's work puts it, "if no evidence can be gathered to demonstrate that a historical actor thought what you attribute to him or her, no conjecture can be beyond the realm of hypothetical possibility—just make things up, if you need to."[1]:326 This technique allows secular critics to quite literally create any explanation that they wish to account for Joseph's ability to restore the Church.
Secular critics, as a result of their inability to accept what they call "paranormal experiences," must come up with explanations for why Joseph Smith was able to create and grow the Church. Since many of the primary documents from Joseph and his associates accept evidence of spiritual experiences and angelic visitations as normal, secular critics look at Joseph's surrounding environment in order to deduce his thoughts and dreams, thus creating a "psychobiography" of the Prophet. A well-known critical work in which this technique is heavily employed is Fawn Brodie's No Man Knows My History. Consider the following:
But the need for deference was strong within [Joseph]. Talented far beyond his brothers or friends, he was impatient with their modest hopes and humdrum fancies. Nimble-witted, ambitious, and gifted with a boundless imagination, he dreamed of escape into an illustrious and affluent future. For Joseph was not meant to be a plodding farmer, tied to the earth by habit or by love for the recurrent miracle of harvest. He detested the plow as only a farmer's son can, and looked with despair on the fearful mortage [check spelling] that clouded their future.[2]:18
Brodie's prose is very readable, and would be well suited to a fictional novel. Unfortunately, nothing in the paragraph quoted above is referenced to any sort of a source. According to Dr. Charles L. Cohen, professor of history and religious studies, and director of the Lubar Institute for the Study of the Abrahamic Religions at the University of Wisconsin-Madison:
This habit of insinuating herself into historical actors' minds constitutes the second part of Brodie's method. "For weeks" after learning that Martin Harris had lost the 116-page translation of the golden plates, she stated, "Joseph writhed in self-reproach for his folly." Lucy Smith described her son's distraught reaction when Harris told him the bad news, but, though one can well imagine Joseph agonizing over what to do, there is insufficient evidence to say in an unqualified declarative sentence what he actually did.[3]
Since Brodie's work is heavily referenced by critics, Brodie's opinions eventually become considered to be "fact" by those who wish to tear down the Church. Brodie's pronouncements regarding Joseph's motives are then passed along to the next anti-Mormon writer. Consider how the following claim evolves from speculation to "documented endnote," when Brodie states:
The awesome vision he described in later years was probably the elaboration of some half-remembered dream stimulated by the early revival excitement and reinforced by the rich folklore of visions circulating in his neighborhood. Or it may have been sheer invention, created some time after 1830 when the need arose for a magnificent tradition to cancel out the stories of his fortune-telling and money-digging. Dream images came easily to this youth, whose imagination was as untrammeled as the whole West (emphasis added).[2]:25
Now observe how author Richard Abanes treats this quote in his book Becoming Gods (retitled Inside Today's Mormonism):
Such a theory boldly challenges LDS apostle James Faust's contention that critics of the First Vision "find it difficult to explain away." His assertion is further weakened by yet another theory of Brodie's, which posits that Smith's story might have been "created some time after 1830 when the need arose for a magnificent tradition to cancel out the stories of his fortune-telling and money-digging" (emphasis added).[4]
Here we have an unsupported theory by Brodie being confirmed by another author to "further weaken" LDS claims about the First Vision. Brodie's speculation of "was probably" and "it may have been" now becomes a cited endnote in Abanes' work. The speculation of one author has become the documented fact for the next author down the line.
Another author who takes great liberties in deducing Joseph's thoughts and dreams is Dan Vogel. Vogel's book Joseph Smith: The Making of a Prophet liberally assigns motives to the Prophet which cannot be backed up with any primary source. Instead, the author must interpret the meaning behind second- and third-hand sources that agree with his point-of-view.
Frankly admitting his "inclination . . . to interpret any claim of the paranormal . . . as delusion or fraud" (p. xii), Vogel refuses to accept Joseph's and his supporters' autobiographical statements—most of which grant, either explicitly or implicitly, such "paranormal" phenomena as angels, revelation, visions, and prophecy—at face value. Vogel's Joseph opens his mouth only to lie and deceive; and whatever he might be experiencing, or trying to do, or thinking about, one can rest assured that it's not what any record generated by him or his sympathizers would have us believe.[5]:206
When an author disregards the primary sources—the statements made by Joseph Smith himself—it becomes possible to create any story, motivation, thought or dream which suits the author's purpose. Responding to Vogel's description of Joseph's prayers and thoughts on September 21, 1823 leading up to the visit of Moroni, BYU professors Andrew and Dawson Hedges note:
What more could a student of early Mormon history possibly want? Here, in a crisp three pages, is a detailed account of what Joseph Smith was thinking about, praying about, and hesitating about over 180 years ago during one of the most significant 24-hour periods in church history. And not just what he was thinking about, in general terms, but how and when, within this 24-hour period, his thoughts evolve! And Vogel gives us all this without a single source to guide his pen—indeed, in direct contravention of what the sources say! One might chalk up this ability to navigate so confidently and so deftly through Joseph's mind to some type of clairvoyance on Vogel's part—"clairvogelance," we could call it—were it not that he himself protests so loudly against anything smacking of the "paranormal."[5]:211
Again, as with Brodie, and freed from the constraint of having to use actual sources, the author can attribute any thought or motivation to the Prophet that they wish in order to explain the unexplainable.
Everything in Joseph's past was reinterpreted to "enhance the glory of the present."Author's sources:
The Book of Mormon was a "secret source of worry" to Joseph, and in response he published extracts from View of the Hebrews, Wonders of Nature, and other books that supported the Book of Mormon's story.Author's sources:
Joseph said regarding the Book of Mormon manuscript that he had "had trouble enough with this thing."Author's sources:
- The Return 2:315 (Aug. 1890)
Even if true, it is not clear what the author hopes to prove. Joseph clearly did not abandon the Book of Mormon, or regret its production. On the evening before his death, the prophet bore testimony of its truth to his guards (History of the Church, 6:600. Volume 6 link).
Joseph Smith claimed that the word "Mormon" meant "more good."Author's sources:
- Times and Seasons 4:194 (May 15, 1843)
I may safely say that the word Mormon stands independent of the learning and wisdom of this generation.-Before I give a definition, however, to the word, let me say that the Savior says according to the gospel of John, I" am the good shepherd;" and it will not be beyond the common use of terms, to say that good is among the most important in use, and though known by various names in different languages, still its meaning is the same, and is ever in opposition to bad. We say from the Saxon, good; the Dane, god,; the Goth, goda; the German, gut; the Dutch, goed; the Latin, bonus; the Greek, kalos; the Hebrew, tob; and the Egyptian, mon. Hence, with the addition of more, of the contraction, mor, we have the word Mormon; which means, literally, more good.[6]
Much of the endowment ritual was borrowed from the Freemasons.Author's sources:
- Author's conjecture.
Critics have noted that Joseph's initiation into Freemasonry (15–16 March 1842) predates his introduction of the full temple endowment among the Saints (4 May 1842). They thus claim that Masonry was a necessary element for Joseph's self-generated "revelation" of the Nauvoo-era temple ceremonies.
Joseph demonstrated knowledge of temple theology very early on in his prophetic career. Matthew Brown offered this timeline for consideration:
In evidence of these fact, we find that upon his initiation into Masonry Joseph Smith was already explaining things which the Masons themselves did not comprehend. According to one witness:
"the Prophet explained many things about the rites that even Masons do not pretend to understand but which he made most clear and beautiful." [8]
Notes
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now