FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate/Critical Realism"
m (→top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Main Page}} |
{{BookHeader | {{BookHeader | ||
|title=[[../../../]] | |title=[[../../../]] | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*“There are no rules for choice between paradigms but there are criteria of assessment independent of particular paradigms.” (Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms, 113-15) | *“There are no rules for choice between paradigms but there are criteria of assessment independent of particular paradigms.” (Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms, 113-15) | ||
I suggest that the Bible keys collected here can provide a beginning core of overlap to which people can retreat in discussing prophets. For those who may not accept the authority of the Bible, I have suggested other places of common ground to which we can retreat for which I have links in the Author’s Note. | I suggest that the Bible keys collected here can provide a beginning core of overlap to which people can retreat in discussing prophets. For those who may not accept the authority of the Bible, I have suggested other places of common ground to which we can retreat for which I have links in the Author’s Note. | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 13:01, 13 April 2024
[[{{{L}}}|{{{H}}}]]
Ian Barbour’s Critical Realism
- Theory influences observation with the result that all data are to some degree theory-laden. Although proponents of rival theories inevitably talk through each other to a degree, adherents “of rival theories can seek a common core of overlap . . . to which both can retreat.”
- “Comprehensive theories are indeed resistant to falsification, but observation does exert some control over theory; an accumulation of anomalies cannot be ignored indefinitely.”
- “There are no rules for choice between paradigms but there are criteria of assessment independent of particular paradigms.” (Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms, 113-15)