Difference between revisions of "The Joseph Smith Papyri"
m
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Articles FAIR copyright}}
+
{{Main Page}}
−
<onlyinclude>
+
 
−
{{SummaryHeader
 
−
|link=Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri
 
−
|heading=The Joseph Smith Papyri
 
−
|summary=
 
−
|sublink1=
 
−
}}
 
 
{{Epigraph|An example of what I am talking about is the recent discovery of the papyrus scrolls from which Joseph Smith was presumed to have translated the book of Abraham in the Pearl of Great Price. Modern scholars, looking at the scrolls, found nothing they considered to be similar to that book. I remarked at the time that such a finding didn't bother me in the least. God doesn't need a crib sheet in the form of a papyrus scroll to reveal Abraham's thoughts and words to Joseph Smith, with any degree of precision He considers necessary for His purposes. If the only function of the scrolls was to awaken the Prophet to the idea of receiving such inspiration, they would have fulfilled their purpose.<br><br>
 
{{Epigraph|An example of what I am talking about is the recent discovery of the papyrus scrolls from which Joseph Smith was presumed to have translated the book of Abraham in the Pearl of Great Price. Modern scholars, looking at the scrolls, found nothing they considered to be similar to that book. I remarked at the time that such a finding didn't bother me in the least. God doesn't need a crib sheet in the form of a papyrus scroll to reveal Abraham's thoughts and words to Joseph Smith, with any degree of precision He considers necessary for His purposes. If the only function of the scrolls was to awaken the Prophet to the idea of receiving such inspiration, they would have fulfilled their purpose.<br><br>
 
&mdash;Henry Eyring, ''Reflections of a Scientist'', p. 46}}
 
&mdash;Henry Eyring, ''Reflections of a Scientist'', p. 46}}
 
{{parabreak}}
 
{{parabreak}}
 +
 +
<onlyinclude>
 +
{{T5
 +
|L=Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri
 +
|H=The Joseph Smith Papyri
 +
|V=<embedvideo service="youtube">pNBzMhJFGWo</embedvideo>
 +
|S=Joseph Smith had in his possession three or four long scrolls, plus a hypocephalus (Facsimile 2). Of these original materials, only a handful of fragments were recovered at the Metropolitan Museum. The majority of the papyri remains lost, and has likely been destroyed. There are a number of criticisms related to the recovered fragments of the Joseph Smith papyri. These criticisms are addressed below. <ref>Criticisms regarding the Book of Abraham and Joseph Smith papyri are raised in the following publications: “Universalism in Ohio,” ''Evangelical Magazine and Gospel Advocate'' (Utica, New York) (12 September 1835): 291. {{link|url=http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/BOMP&CISOPTR=1061&REC=8}}; {{CriticalWork:Ashment:Egyptian Magical Papyri|pages=1&ndash;}}; {{CriticalWork:Larson:By His Own Hand|pages=1&ndash;}}; Jerald and Sandra Tanner, "Solving the Mystery of the Joseph Smith Papyri," ''Salt Lake City Messenger'' 82 (September 1992): 1&ndash;12.; {{CriticalWork:Tanner:Changing World|pages=Chapter 11}}; {{CriticalWork:Watchman Fellowship:Articles|pages=3}}</ref>
 +
 +
<small>Video published by the Church History Department.</small>
 +
|L1=Online source documents
 +
|L2=The Joseph Smith Papyri: Source Quotes
 +
|L3=Identity and nature of the papyrus in the Church's possession
 +
|L4=When did the Church disclose that the Joseph Smith Papyri were an Egyptian funerary text?
 +
|L5=Why is the Book of Abraham text not on the papyri?
 +
|L6=The facsimiles in the Book of Abraham
 +
|L7=Antiquity of the Book of Abraham
 +
}}
 +
 +
 +
{{SeeAlso|Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Kirtland Egyptian Papers}}
 +
</onlyinclude>
 +
 
{{Source documents label}}
 
{{Source documents label}}
 
*View high [http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/egyptian-papyri resolution images of the Joseph Smith Papyri online].
 
*View high [http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/egyptian-papyri resolution images of the Joseph Smith Papyri online].
−
<onlyinclude>
 
−
{{SummaryHeader
 
−
|link=Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri
 
−
|subject=The Joseph Smith Papyri
 
−
|summary=Joseph Smith had in his possession three or four long scrolls, plus a hypocephalus (Facsimile 2). Of these original materials, only a handful of fragments were recovered at the Metropolitan Museum. The majority of the papyri remains lost, and has likely been destroyed. There are a number of criticisms related to the recovered fragments of the Joseph Smith papyri. These criticisms are addressed below. <ref>Criticisms regarding the Book of Abraham and Joseph Smith papyri are raised in the following publications: “Universalism in Ohio,” ''Evangelical Magazine and Gospel Advocate'' (Utica, New York) (12 September 1835): 291. {{link|url=http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/BOMP&CISOPTR=1061&REC=8}}; {{CriticalWork:Ashment:Egyptian Magical Papyri|pages=1&ndash;}}; {{CriticalWork:Larson:By His Own Hand|pages=1&ndash;}}; Jerald and Sandra Tanner, "Solving the Mystery of the Joseph Smith Papyri," ''Salt Lake City Messenger'' 82 (September 1992): 1&ndash;12.; {{CriticalWork:Tanner:Changing World|pages=Chapter 11}}; {{CriticalWork:Watchman Fellowship:Articles|pages=3}}</ref>
 
−
}}
 
−
===== =====
 
−
{{SummaryItem
 
−
|link=Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Quotes
 
−
|subject=Source quotes
 
−
|summary=A collection of source quotes related to the Joseph Smith Papyri
 
−
}}
 
−
===== =====
 
−
{{SummaryItem
 
−
|link=Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Identity and nature
 
−
|subject=Identity and nature of the papyrus in the Church's possession
 
−
|summary=In July 1835, Joseph Smith purchased a portion of a collection of papyri and mummies that had been discovered in Egypt and brought to the United States. Believing that one of the papyrus rolls contained, "the writings of Abraham while he was in Egypt," and "purportedly written by his own hand, upon papyrus,"<ref>{{HoC|vol=2|start=235, 236, 348|end=351}}</ref> Joseph commenced a translation. The Book of Abraham was the result of his work. The translated text and facsimiles of three drawings were published in the early 1840s in serial fashion in the LDS newspaper ''Times and Seasons''. The entire work was published in 1852 in England as part of ''The Pearl of Great Price'', which was later canonized as part of LDS scripture.
 
−
|sublink1=Question: What is the relationship of the Joseph Smith Papyri to the Book of Abraham?
 
−
|sublink2=Question: What happened to the papyri after Joseph's death?
 
−
|sublink3=Question: What do the Joseph Smith papyri fragments consist of?
 
−
}}
 
−
[[File:IE_Jan1968_cover.jpg|thumb|400 px|right|Cover of the January 1968 issue of the ''Improvement Era'', the Church's official magazine of the time. Note the color photograph of the recovered [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/abr/fac_1 Facsimile 1].]]
 
−
===== =====
 
−
{{SummaryItem
 
−
|link=Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Church disclosure of "Book of the Dead"
 
−
|subject=When did the Church disclose that the Joseph Smith Papyri were an Egyptian funerary text?
 
−
|summary=Critics often assert that the Church did not identify the Joseph Smith Papyri as an Egyptian funerary text until after Egyptologists examined them. They also claim that the Church is hiding or "covering up" the papyri's actual contents. Both assertions are incorrect. In fact, the Church ran a multi-part series with color pictures of the papyri in the ''Improvement Era'' (the predecessor to the ''Ensign'') less than two months after they were received from the Metropolitan Museum.<ref>The 11-part series, written by Dr. Hugh Nibley and entitled "A New Look at the Pearl of Great Price", began in the January 1968 ''Improvement Era'' and ran in every issue until May 1970 (with the exception of December 1969 and February 1970). Nibley's series has been available as a FARMS reprint (N-NEP) since 1990, and several chapters became part of Nibley's book ''Abraham In Egypt''.</ref> The series repeatedly affirmed that the recovered papyri contained Egyptian funerary materials and not the text of Book of Abraham. Although the article erroneously identified the papyrus as the Egyptian "Book of the Dead," it was later correctly identified as a "Book of Breathings."
 
−
|sublink1=Question: Was the Church forthright in identifying the rediscovered papyrus prior to their examination by non-LDS Egyptologists?
 
−
|sublink2=Question: What did the Church announce in 1968 when the Joseph Smith papyri fragments were discovered?
 
−
|sublink3=Question: How long did the Church know about the papyri before they published information about them?
 
−
}}
 
  
−
===== =====
+
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Quotes}}
−
{{SummaryItem
+
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Identity and nature}}
−
|link=Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Dating
+
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Church disclosure of "Book of the Dead"}}
−
|subject=Dating of the Joseph Smith Papyri
 
−
|summary=Joseph said that "one of the rolls contained the writings of Abraham,"<ref>{{HoC1|vol=2|start=236}}</ref> and his scribes quoted him as saying the scroll was "written by his [Abraham's] own hand, upon papyrus."<ref>Michael H. Marquardt, "A Book Note &mdash; Hugh Nibley's ''Abraham in Egypt''" (2000).</ref> The problem is that most modern scholars (including LDS scholars) date the papyri to a few centuries before Christ, whereas Abraham lived about two millennia before Christ. Obviously, Abraham himself could not have penned the papyri. The phrase "by his own hand" can simply mean that Abraham is the author of the book. Similarly, we could hold a modern printed Bible in our hands, point to 1 Corinthians, and say, "This was written by the Apostle Paul." Joseph was translating the writings of Abraham, so it is quite possible that he believed that the actual scroll in his possession was written by Abraham himself. There is no evidence, however, that this belief was based on revelation.
 
−
|sublink1=Question: Did Abraham himself pen the Joseph Smith Papyri?
 
−
}}<noinclude>
 
 
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Text}}
 
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Text}}
−
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Kirtland Egyptian Papers}}
 
−
[[Image:BOAfacsimile1.jpg|frame|200px|right|Photograph of Facsimile 1 from the recovered Joseph Smith Papyri]]
 
 
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Facsimiles}}
 
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Facsimiles}}
−
</noinclude>
+
{{:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Preservation of Ancient Core}}
−
</onlyinclude>
+
 
  
−
</onlyinclude>
+
{{Critical sources box:Book of Abraham/Papyri/Long article/CriticalSources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 +
[[Category:Book of Abraham]]
 +
 
[[de:Buch Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri]]
 
[[de:Buch Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri]]
−
[[en:Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri]]
 
 
[[es:El Libro de Abraham/Papiros de José Smith]]
 
[[es:El Libro de Abraham/Papiros de José Smith]]
 
[[pt:O Livro de Abraão/Joseph Smith Papiros]]
 
[[pt:O Livro de Abraão/Joseph Smith Papiros]]
−
 
−
[[Category:Book of Abraham]]
 

Latest revision as of 19:59, 1 May 2024


An example of what I am talking about is the recent discovery of the papyrus scrolls from which Joseph Smith was presumed to have translated the book of Abraham in the Pearl of Great Price. Modern scholars, looking at the scrolls, found nothing they considered to be similar to that book. I remarked at the time that such a finding didn't bother me in the least. God doesn't need a crib sheet in the form of a papyrus scroll to reveal Abraham's thoughts and words to Joseph Smith, with any degree of precision He considers necessary for His purposes. If the only function of the scrolls was to awaken the Prophet to the idea of receiving such inspiration, they would have fulfilled their purpose.

—Henry Eyring, Reflections of a Scientist, p. 46
∗       ∗       ∗


The Joseph Smith Papyri

Summary: Joseph Smith had in his possession three or four long scrolls, plus a hypocephalus (Facsimile 2). Of these original materials, only a handful of fragments were recovered at the Metropolitan Museum. The majority of the papyri remains lost, and has likely been destroyed. There are a number of criticisms related to the recovered fragments of the Joseph Smith papyri. These criticisms are addressed below. [1]

Video published by the Church History Department.

Jump to Subtopic:


See also: Book of Abraham/Joseph Smith Papyri/Kirtland Egyptian Papers


Online source documents


The Joseph Smith Papyri: Source Quotes

Summary: A collection of source quotes related to the Joseph Smith Papyri


Jump to details:


Identity and nature of the papyrus in the Church's possession


Jump to details:


When did the Church disclose that the Joseph Smith Papyri were an Egyptian funerary text?

Summary: Critics often assert that the Church did not identify the Joseph Smith Papyri as an Egyptian funerary text until after Egyptologists examined them. They also claim that the Church is hiding or "covering up" the papyri's actual contents. Both assertions are incorrect. In fact, the Church ran a multi-part series with color pictures of the papyri in the Improvement Era (the predecessor to the Ensign) less than two months after they were received from the Metropolitan Museum. The series repeatedly affirmed that the recovered papyri contained Egyptian funerary materials and not the text of Book of Abraham.


Jump to details:


Why is the Book of Abraham text not on the papyri?

Summary: We do not claim to know why the text of the Book of Abraham (or the missing Book of Joseph) is not in evidence on the fragments of papyrus that were recovered. Critics, of course, simply assume this to be conclusive evidence that Joseph was a fraud. From a believer's perspective, however, there are several possible theories to account for this: 1) The text was revealed much in the same manner as that of the Book of Mormon, without the need for the actual papyri, 2) The text was present on portions of the papyri that are missing, and 3) The Book of Abraham manuscript was attached to the Book of Breathings manuscript and was lost. 4) Perhaps there was a way of understanding the Egyptian ideograms anciently that is unknown to Egyptology in our day, yet to be discovered, deciphered or acknowledged, that could yield an interpretation of a text that is different than the standard Egyptological reading.

Jump to Subtopic:


The facsimiles in the Book of Abraham

Summary: In the Book of Abraham, Joseph included three facsimiles of illustrations from the papyri, along with commentary about what the images and their individual parts represented. Some of Joseph's interpretations are similar to those of trained Egyptologists, but most are not. A number of criticisms relate to the three facsimiles associated with the Book of Abraham. It is noted that Joseph Smith's translation of the facsimiles does not agree with that provided by Egyptologists, and that some missing portions of the facsimiles were incorrectly restored before they were published.


Jump to details:

Antiquity of the Book of Abraham


Jump to details:


Source(s) of the criticism
Critical sources
  • Edward H. Ashment, The Use of Egyptian Magical Papyri to Authenticate the Book of Abraham: A Critical Review, Salt Lake City: Resource Communications, 1993.
  • Charles M. Larson, By His Own Hand Upon Papyrus: A New Look at the Joseph Smith Papyri, 2nd ed., (Grand Rapids, MI: Institute for Religious Research, 1992), .
  • Jerald and Sandra Tanner, "Solving the Mystery of the Joseph Smith Papyri," Salt Lake City Messenger 82 (September 1992): 1–12.
  • Jerald and Sandra Tanner, The Changing World of Mormonism (Moody Press, 1979), Chapter 11.( Index of claims )

Notes

  1. ↑ Criticisms regarding the Book of Abraham and Joseph Smith papyri are raised in the following publications: “Universalism in Ohio,” Evangelical Magazine and Gospel Advocate (Utica, New York) (12 September 1835): 291. off-site; Edward H. Ashment, The Use of Egyptian Magical Papyri to Authenticate the Book of Abraham: A Critical Review (Salt Lake City: Resource Communications, 1993), 1–.; Charles M. Larson, By His Own Hand Upon Papyrus: A New Look at the Joseph Smith Papyri, 2nd ed., (Grand Rapids, MI: Institute for Religious Research, 1992), 1–.; Jerald and Sandra Tanner, "Solving the Mystery of the Joseph Smith Papyri," Salt Lake City Messenger 82 (September 1992): 1–12.; Jerald and Sandra Tanner, The Changing World of Mormonism (Moody Press, 1979), Chapter 11.( Index of claims ); Watchman Fellowship, The Watchman Expositor (Page 3)
Retrieved from "https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=The_Joseph_Smith_Papyri&oldid=255428"