Difference between revisions of "Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes"

m (top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{Main Page}}
{{Resource Title|Doctrine and Covenants Textual Changes}}
 
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
{{SummaryHeader
+
{{H1
|link=Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes
+
|L=Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes
|subject=Textual changes in the Doctrine and Covenants
+
|H=Textual changes in the Doctrine and Covenants
|summary=Joseph Smith and others made revisions, additions, and deletions to his early revelations when preparing them for publication. Some claim that revelations from God are inerrant and should never be changed, and that this proves that Joseph Smith did not receive revelation.
+
|S=Joseph Smith and others made revisions, additions, and deletions to his early revelations when preparing them for publication. Some claim that revelations from God are inerrant and should never be changed, and that this proves that Joseph Smith did not receive revelation.
}}
+
|L1=Why and how revelations were modified in the Doctrine and Covenants
===== =====
+
|L2=Oliver Cowdery and the "rod of nature"
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes/Why did Joseph Smith edit revelations
 
|subject=Why did Joseph Smith and others edit the revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants?
 
|summary=Joseph Smith made revisions, additions, and deletions to his early revelations when preparing them for publication. Are revelations from God inerrant and thus should never be changed? Were the revelations in the Book of Commandments modified because they were "showing their age," "contained outdated information," "included erroneous statements" and "abandoned doctrines?"
 
|sublink1=Question: Who made the changes to the Doctrine and Covenants?
 
|sublink2=Question: What changes were made to the Doctrine and Covenants?
 
|sublink3=Question: What are the reasons for the changes to the Doctrine and Covenants?
 
|sublink4=Question: How do Mormons understand prophetic revelation?
 
|sublink5=Question: Were the changes to the revelations hidden from the Church members?
 
|sublink6=Question: Have edits to the revelations been discussed in the present day?
 
|sublink7=Source:Brigham Young:JD 1:314:I do not even believe that there is a single revelation, among the many God has given to the Church, that is perfect in its fulness
 
|sublink8=Question: Was the revelation comprising the current Doctrine and Covenants 27 altered to include mention of the priesthood restoration?
 
}}
 
===== =====
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Doctrine and Covenants/Oliver Cowdery and the "rod of nature"
 
|subject=Oliver Cowdery and the "rod of nature"
 
|summary=It is claimed that a revelation received by Joseph praised Oliver Cowdery's gift of using divining talents. It is claimed that the revelation was published in the Book of Commandments in its original form, then subsequently modified in the Doctrine and Covenants in order to hide the reference to the "rod of nature." Therefore, Joseph attempted to "cover up" Oliver Cowdery's work with a divining rod by changing a revelation.
 
}}
 
===== =====
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Doctrine and Covenants/Direct quotation from God
 
|subject=Direct quotation from God?
 
|summary=Is the wording of the D&C revelations a direct word-for-word quotation from God? Critics note that if the Doctrine and Covenants contained quotations from God, why would Joseph Smith later edit God's words?
 
}}
 
===== =====
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes/Adam and Michael conflated in Doctrine and Covenants 137
 
|subject=Adam and Michael conflated in Doctrine and Covenants 137
 
|summary=The name "Michael" was deleted from Joseph Smith's vision of the Celestial Kingdom because Adam is Michael. Was the Church trying to hide a "slip up" by Joseph Smith, who had identified Adam as Michael on multiple occasions in the past?
 
 
}}
 
}}
 +
{{:Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes/Why did Joseph Smith edit revelations}}
 +
{{:Doctrine and Covenants/Oliver Cowdery and the "rod of nature"}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>
 +
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
  
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
+
[[de:Lehre und Bündnisse/Textuelle Änderungen]]
 
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
[[de:Text%C3%A4nderungen_in_Lehre_und_B%C3%BCndnisse]]
 
[[en:Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes]]
 
 
[[es:Doctrina y Convenios/Cambios en el texto]]
 
[[es:Doctrina y Convenios/Cambios en el texto]]
 
[[pt:Doutrina e Convênios/Alterações textuais]]
 
[[pt:Doutrina e Convênios/Alterações textuais]]

Latest revision as of 13:21, 13 April 2024


Textual changes in the Doctrine and Covenants

Summary: Joseph Smith and others made revisions, additions, and deletions to his early revelations when preparing them for publication. Some claim that revelations from God are inerrant and should never be changed, and that this proves that Joseph Smith did not receive revelation.


Jump to Subtopic:

Overview of changes to the Doctrine and Covenants


Jump to details:


Oliver Cowdery and the "rod of nature"

Summary: It is claimed that a revelation received by Joseph praised Oliver Cowdery's gift of using divining talents. It is claimed that the revelation was published in the Book of Commandments in its original form, then subsequently modified in the Doctrine and Covenants in order to hide the reference to the "rod of nature." Therefore, it is claimed that Joseph attempted to "cover up" Oliver Cowdery's work with a divining rod by changing a revelation. Critics also claim that Oliver would ask questions of his divining rod in faith and it would move in response.


Jump to details: