FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Firesides/28 November 2010 - Sweden/12"
(→) |
m (→top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Main Page}} |
| − | + | <onlyinclude> | |
| − | + | {{H1 | |
| − | | | + | |L=Firesides/28 November 2010 - Sweden/12 |
| − | | | + | |H=Response to questions about the priesthood ban |
| − | + | |S= | |
| − | + | |L1= | |
| − | | | + | |T=[[../|Questions Asked at 2010 Swedish Fireside (a.k.a. the "Swedish Rescue")]] |
| − | | | + | |A= |
| − | + | |<=[[../11|Response to questions about angelic visitations]] | |
| + | |>=[[../13|Response to questions about temple concerns]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Swedish questions quick jump}} | {{Swedish questions quick jump}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:24, 13 April 2024
Response to questions about the priesthood ban
| Response to questions about angelic visitations | A FAIR Analysis of: Questions Asked at 2010 Swedish Fireside (a.k.a. the "Swedish Rescue"), a work by author:
|
Response to questions about temple concerns |
1: BoM translation—2: Polygamy and Polyandry—3: Polygamy forced?—4: Book of Abraham—5: "Lying for Lord"—6: Mark Hofmann—7: Blood atonement—8: First Vision—9: Sanitized history—10: "Not all truth is useful"—11: Angelic affidavits—12: Blacks and priesthood—13: Temple concerns—14: Evidence of Vikings—15: Adam-God—16: Kinderhook
The attendees of The "Swedish Rescue" fireside ask the following question:
[In reading] about the priesthood and the blacks.
- David O. McKay .... he had made OK that they should have the priesthood. But three of the apostles were not there and when they come back, they said no.
- Is this true that there were some apostles that went against the question to give the priesthood to the Blacks?
- Mark E Peterson....talks a lot about the blacks and the pre-existence and they are damned and so on because they were black.
- David O. McKay .... he had made OK that they should have the priesthood. But three of the apostles were not there and when they come back, they said no.
- Is this true that there were some apostles that went against the question to give the priesthood to the Blacks?
- Mark E Peterson....talks a lot about the blacks and the pre-existence and they are damned and so on because they were black.
Answer: There is a period of studying it out in the mind prior to receiving revelation.
David O. McKay blacks and the priesthood. The June 1978 revelation has a history to it like all revelations. You have this period of time in which saints are studying it out in the mind and they eventually flower as revelation.
- —Brother Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.
- Question: Why did some of the apostles disagree about lifting the priesthood ban?
Answer: We don't know.
It’s possible. I think it would be entirely consistent with the way things are done. Does that make sense?
- —Brother Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.