|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | *Taking the position that Lehi existed, then population genetics predicts that virtually all Amerindians and Polynesians ''are'' his literal descendants. They are simply not ''exclusively'' his descendants. ''The author wants to make Lehite links absurd or impossible.''
| + | {{appeal to ridicule|Taking the position that Lehi existed, then population genetics predicts that virtually all Amerindians and Polynesians are his literal descendants. They are simply not exclusively his descendants. The author wants to make Lehite links absurd or impossible. |
| − | {{Repeat|l1=xvi|l2=37|l3=38|l4=47|l5=54|l6=202|l7=205|l8=206|#xvi|#37|#38|#47|#54|#202|#205|#206}}<noinclude>
| + | }} |
| − | [[fr:Modèle:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:All from Lehi]]
| |
| − | </noinclude>
| |
Latest revision as of 09:36, 26 November 2016
Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Ridicule—The author is presenting the argument in such a way that it makes his or her subject look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument or exaggerating it.
Taking the position that Lehi existed, then population genetics predicts that virtually all Amerindians and Polynesians are his literal descendants. They are simply not exclusively his descendants. The author wants to make Lehite links absurd or impossible.
