Difference between revisions of "Official doctrine in the Church"

m
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{Main Page}}
{{Resource Title|What is official or core doctrine?}}
+
{{Navigation:Prophets and Church leaders}}{{blankline}}
== ==
 
{{Criticism label}}
 
  
Some people are fond of imposing their absolutist assumptions on the Church. Many hold inerrantist beliefs about scriptures or prophets, and assume that the Mormons have similar views. They therefore insist—without reason—that any statement by any Latter-day Saint Church leader represents Mormon doctrine and is thus something that is secretly believed, or that should be believed, by Mormons.
+
="Approaching Mormon Doctrine," ''LDS Newsroom'' (May 2007): "Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine"=
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church. With divine inspiration, the First Presidency (the prophet and his two counselors) and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles (the second-highest governing body of the Church) counsel together to establish doctrine that is consistently proclaimed in official Church publications. This doctrine resides in the four "standard works" of scripture (the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price), official declarations and proclamations, and the Articles of Faith. Isolated statements are often taken out of context, leaving their original meaning distorted. {{read more|url=https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/approaching-mormon-doctrine}} <ref>"Approaching Latter-day Saint Doctrine," ''Newsroom'' (May 2007)</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
  
== ==
+
=D. Todd Christofferson (Apr 2012): "it should be remembered that not every statement made by a Church leader past or present necessarily constitutes doctrine"=
{{ChurchResponseBar
+
<blockquote>
|summary=Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church. With divine inspiration, the First Presidency (the prophet and his two counselors) and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles (the second-highest governing body of the Church) counsel together to establish doctrine that is consistently proclaimed in official Church publications. This doctrine resides in the four “standard works” of scripture (the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price), official declarations and proclamations, and the Articles of Faith. Isolated statements are often taken out of context, leaving their original meaning distorted.
+
The President of the Church may announce or interpret doctrines based on revelation to him. Doctrinal exposition may also come through the combined council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. Council deliberations will often include a weighing of canonized scriptures, the teachings of Church leaders, and past practice. But in the end, just as in the New Testament church, the objective is not simply consensus among council members, but revelation from God. It is a process involving both reason and faith for obtaining the mind and will of the Lord.
|publication=LDS Newsroom
 
|publisher=The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
 
|link=http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/commentary/approaching-mormon-doctrine
 
|title=Approaching Mormon Doctrine
 
|date=May 4, 2007
 
}}
 
  
== ==
+
At the same time it should be remembered that not every statement made by a Church leader past or present necessarily constitutes doctrine. It is commonly understood in the church that a statement made by one leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well considered, opinion not meant to be official or binding for the whole Church. The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that a prophet is a prophet only when he is acting as such. {{read more|url=http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2012/04/the-doctrine-of-christ?lang=eng}} <ref>D. Todd Christofferson, "The Doctrine of Christ," April 2012 General Conference, Sunday Morning Session (1 Apr 2012)</ref>
{{ChurchResponseBar
+
</blockquote>
|summary=The President of the Church may announce or interpret doctrines based on revelation to him. Doctrinal exposition may also come through the combined council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. Council deliberations will often include a weighing of canonized scriptures, the teachings of Church leaders, and past practice. But in the end, just as in the New Testament church, the objective is not simply consensus among council members, but revelation from God. It is a process involving both reason and faith for obtaining the mind and will of the Lord.
 
<br>
 
At the same time it should be remembered that not every statement made by a Church leader past or present necessarily constitutes doctrine. It is commonly understood in the church that a statement made by one leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well considered, opinion not meant to be official or binding for the whole Church. The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that a prophet is a prophet only when he is acting as such.
 
|author=Elder D. Todd Christofferson
 
|publication=April 2012 General Conference, Sunday Morning Session.
 
|title=The Doctrine of Christ
 
|link=http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2012/04/the-doctrine-of-christ?lang=eng
 
|date=April 1, 2012
 
}}
 
  
== ==
+
=Neil L. Anderson (Nov 2012): "The doctrine is taught by all 15 members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve. It is not hidden in an obscure paragraph of one talk"=
{{ChurchResponseBar
+
<blockquote>
|summary=There is an important principle that governs the doctrine of the Church. The doctrine is taught by all 15 members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve. It is not hidden in an obscure paragraph of one talk. True principles are taught frequently and by many. Our doctrine is not difficult to find. The leaders of the Church are honest but imperfect men. Remember the words of Moroni: “Condemn me not because of mine imperfection, neither my father … ; but rather give thanks unto God that he hath made manifest unto you our imperfections, that ye may learn to be more wise than we have been.(Mormon 9:31)
+
There is an important principle that governs the doctrine of the Church. The doctrine is taught by all 15 members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve. It is not hidden in an obscure paragraph of one talk. True principles are taught frequently and by many. Our doctrine is not difficult to find. The leaders of the Church are honest but imperfect men. Remember the words of Moroni: "Condemn me not because of mine imperfection, neither my father … ; but rather give thanks unto God that he hath made manifest unto you our imperfections, that ye may learn to be more wise than we have been." (Mormon 9:31) {{read more|url=https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2012/10/trial-of-your-faith?lang=eng}} <ref>Neil L. Anderson, "Trial of Your Faith," ''Ensign'' (Nov 2012)</ref>
|publication=Ensign
+
</blockquote>
|author=Elder Neil L. Anderson
 
|link=https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2012/10/trial-of-your-faith?lang=eng  
 
|title=Trial of Your Faith
 
|date=November 2012
 
}}
 
  
== ==
+
=What is official or core doctrine in the Church of Jesus Christ?=
{{Response label}}
+
==Joseph Smith stated that the fundamental doctrine was "concerning Jesus Christ, that He died, was buried, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven"==
 +
 
 +
Some people are fond of imposing their absolutist assumptions on the Church.  Many hold inerrantist beliefs about scriptures or prophets, and assume that the Mormons have similar views. They therefore insist&mdash;without reason&mdash;that any statement by any Latter-day Saint Church leader represents Mormon doctrine and is thus something that is secretly believed, or that should be believed, by Mormons.
  
===What did Joseph Smith say about our "core" doctrine?===
 
 
Joseph Smith defined our fundamental core doctrine:  
 
Joseph Smith defined our fundamental core doctrine:  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Line 48: Line 30:
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
===What have other Church leaders said on the subject?===
+
Otherwise, Joseph Smith left clear revelation that the canonized scriptures should govern the Church ([https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/42.12,13,56,57,58,59,60?lang=eng D&C 42: 12-13, 56-60]; [https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/104.58-59?lang=eng 104:58-59]), after having been submitted to and approved by all members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve ([https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/107.27?lang=eng D&C 107:27]), and submitted to the general body of the Church for ratification ([https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/26.2?lang=eng D&C 26:2]; [https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/28.13?lang=eng 28:13]).
 +
 
 +
==What have other Church leaders said on the subject?==
 
President George Q. Cannon (counselor in the First Presidency) explained that the scriptures are the only source of official doctrine, coupled with later revelation to the prophets that has been presented to the Church and sustained:
 
President George Q. Cannon (counselor in the First Presidency) explained that the scriptures are the only source of official doctrine, coupled with later revelation to the prophets that has been presented to the Church and sustained:
  
Line 60: Line 44:
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
  
Anything else is valuable and may be of use for explanation, exhortation, and instruction, but does not bear the weight of ‘scripture’ in the LDS canon.  Harold B. Lee was equally explicit:
+
Anything else, including books written by general authorities or general conference addresses, is valuable and may be of use for explanation, elucidation, exhortation, prophecy, and instruction, but does not bear the weight of ‘scripture’ in the LDS canon.  Harold B. Lee was equally explicit:
  
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
Line 83: Line 67:
 
But there are many places where the scriptures are not too clear, and where different interpretations may be given to them; there are many doctrines, tenets as the Lord called them, that have not been officially defined and declared. It is in the consideration and discussion of these scriptures and doctrines that opportunities arise for differences of views as to meanings and extent. In view of the fundamental principle just announced as to the position of the President of the Church, other bearers of the Priesthood, those with the special spiritual endowment and those without it, should be cautious in their expressions about and interpretations of scriptures and doctrines. They must act and teach subject to the over-all power and authority of the President of the Church. It would be most unfortunate were this not always strictly observed by the bearers of this special spiritual endowment, other than the President. Sometimes in the past they have spoken "out of turn," so to speak. Furthermore, at times even those not members of the General Authorities are said to have been heard to declare their own views on various matters concerning which no official view or declaration has been made by the mouthpiece of the Lord, sometimes with an assured certainty that might deceive the uninformed and unwary. <ref>{{Periodical:Clark:When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture:1954|pages=xxx}}</ref></blockquote>
 
But there are many places where the scriptures are not too clear, and where different interpretations may be given to them; there are many doctrines, tenets as the Lord called them, that have not been officially defined and declared. It is in the consideration and discussion of these scriptures and doctrines that opportunities arise for differences of views as to meanings and extent. In view of the fundamental principle just announced as to the position of the President of the Church, other bearers of the Priesthood, those with the special spiritual endowment and those without it, should be cautious in their expressions about and interpretations of scriptures and doctrines. They must act and teach subject to the over-all power and authority of the President of the Church. It would be most unfortunate were this not always strictly observed by the bearers of this special spiritual endowment, other than the President. Sometimes in the past they have spoken "out of turn," so to speak. Furthermore, at times even those not members of the General Authorities are said to have been heard to declare their own views on various matters concerning which no official view or declaration has been made by the mouthpiece of the Lord, sometimes with an assured certainty that might deceive the uninformed and unwary. <ref>{{Periodical:Clark:When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture:1954|pages=xxx}}</ref></blockquote>
  
== ==
+
{{Endnotes sources}}
{{Endnotes label}}
 
 
 
<references/>
 
  
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
+
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[de:Mormonismus und Lehre/Offizielle Lehre oder Kernlehre]]
+
[[Category:Questions]]
 +
[[de:Frage: Was ist offizielle Mormonenlehre?]]
 +
[[de:Quelle:Presseportal der Kirche:Ein Zugang zur Lehre der Mormonen:4. Juli 2007:Nicht jede Aussage eines führenden Repräsentanten der Kirche, ob aus der Vergangenheit oder der Gegenwart, ist notwendigerweise gleich Lehre]]
 +
[[es:Acercarse Doctrina Mormona," LDS Newsroom (May0 2007): "No todas declaración hecha por un líder de la Iglesia, pasado o presente, constituye necesariamente doctrina"]]
 +
[[es:D. Todd Christofferson (Apr 2012): "hay que recordar que no toda declaración hecha por un líder pasado de la Iglesia o la actualidad constituye necesariamente doctrina"]]
 +
[[es:Neil L. Anderson (Nov 2012): "La doctrina es enseñada por los 15 miembros de la Primera Presidencia y el Quórum de los Doce. No se oculta en un párrafo oscuro de una charla"]]
 +
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Cuál es la doctrina mormona oficial o central?]]
 +
[[pt:Fonte:D. Todd Christofferson:Apr 2012:deve-se lembrar que nem toda declaração feita por um passado líder da Igreja ou no presente constitui necessariamente doutrina]]
 +
[[pt:Fonte:LDS Newsroom:Approaching Mormon Doctrine:Maio 2007:Não cada declaração feita por um líder da Igreja, passada ou presente, constitui necessariamente doutrina]]
 +
[[pt:Fonte:Neil L. Anderson:Nov 2012:A doutrina é ensinada por todos os 15 membros da Primeira Presidência e do Quórum dos Doze. Ela não está escondida em um ponto obscuro de um talk]]
 +
[[pt:Pergunta: Qual é a doutrina oficial ou núcleo Mórmon?]]
 +
[[de:Mormonismus und Lehre/Offizielle Lehre oder wesentliche Lehre]]
 
[[es:El Mormonismo y la doctrina/Oficial o doctrina básica/Qué es]]
 
[[es:El Mormonismo y la doctrina/Oficial o doctrina básica/Qué es]]
 +
[[pt:Mormonismo e Doutrina/Oficial ou doutrina central/O que é isso]]

Latest revision as of 23:03, 30 May 2024


"Approaching Mormon Doctrine," LDS Newsroom (May 2007): "Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine"

Not every statement made by a Church leader, past or present, necessarily constitutes doctrine. A single statement made by a single leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well-considered, opinion, but is not meant to be officially binding for the whole Church. With divine inspiration, the First Presidency (the prophet and his two counselors) and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles (the second-highest governing body of the Church) counsel together to establish doctrine that is consistently proclaimed in official Church publications. This doctrine resides in the four "standard works" of scripture (the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants and the Pearl of Great Price), official declarations and proclamations, and the Articles of Faith. Isolated statements are often taken out of context, leaving their original meaning distorted. —(Click here to continue) [1]

D. Todd Christofferson (Apr 2012): "it should be remembered that not every statement made by a Church leader past or present necessarily constitutes doctrine"

The President of the Church may announce or interpret doctrines based on revelation to him. Doctrinal exposition may also come through the combined council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. Council deliberations will often include a weighing of canonized scriptures, the teachings of Church leaders, and past practice. But in the end, just as in the New Testament church, the objective is not simply consensus among council members, but revelation from God. It is a process involving both reason and faith for obtaining the mind and will of the Lord.

At the same time it should be remembered that not every statement made by a Church leader past or present necessarily constitutes doctrine. It is commonly understood in the church that a statement made by one leader on a single occasion often represents a personal, though well considered, opinion not meant to be official or binding for the whole Church. The Prophet Joseph Smith taught that a prophet is a prophet only when he is acting as such. —(Click here to continue) [2]

Neil L. Anderson (Nov 2012): "The doctrine is taught by all 15 members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve. It is not hidden in an obscure paragraph of one talk"

There is an important principle that governs the doctrine of the Church. The doctrine is taught by all 15 members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve. It is not hidden in an obscure paragraph of one talk. True principles are taught frequently and by many. Our doctrine is not difficult to find. The leaders of the Church are honest but imperfect men. Remember the words of Moroni: "Condemn me not because of mine imperfection, neither my father … ; but rather give thanks unto God that he hath made manifest unto you our imperfections, that ye may learn to be more wise than we have been." (Mormon 9:31) —(Click here to continue) [3]

What is official or core doctrine in the Church of Jesus Christ?

Joseph Smith stated that the fundamental doctrine was "concerning Jesus Christ, that He died, was buried, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven"

Some people are fond of imposing their absolutist assumptions on the Church. Many hold inerrantist beliefs about scriptures or prophets, and assume that the Mormons have similar views. They therefore insist—without reason—that any statement by any Latter-day Saint Church leader represents Mormon doctrine and is thus something that is secretly believed, or that should be believed, by Mormons.

Joseph Smith defined our fundamental core doctrine:

The fundamental principles of our religion are the testimony of the Apostles and Prophets, concerning Jesus Christ, that He died, was buried, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven; and all other things which pertain to our religion are only appendages to it.
Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 121.

Otherwise, Joseph Smith left clear revelation that the canonized scriptures should govern the Church (D&C 42: 12-13, 56-60; 104:58-59), after having been submitted to and approved by all members of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve (D&C 107:27), and submitted to the general body of the Church for ratification (D&C 26:2; 28:13).

What have other Church leaders said on the subject?

President George Q. Cannon (counselor in the First Presidency) explained that the scriptures are the only source of official doctrine, coupled with later revelation to the prophets that has been presented to the Church and sustained:

I hold in my hand the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, and also the book, The Pearl of Great Price, which books contain revelations of God. In Kirtland, the Doctrine and Covenants in its original form, as first printed, was submitted to the officers of the Church and the members of the Church to vote upon. As there have been additions made to it by the publishing of revelations which were not contained in the original edition, it has been deemed wise to submit these books with their contents to the conference, to see whether the conference will vote to accept the books and their contents as from God, and binding upon us as a people and as a Church. [4]

B.H. Roberts further explained that only those things within the Standard Works and those presented for a sustaining vote by the First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles is binding upon the Church and its members:

The Church has confined the sources of doctrine by which it is willing to be bound before the world to the things that God has revealed, and which the Church has officially accepted, and those alone. These would include the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, the Pearl of Great Price; these have been repeatedly accepted and endorsed by the Church in general conference assembled, and are the only sources of absolute appeal for our doctrine. [5]

Anything else, including books written by general authorities or general conference addresses, is valuable and may be of use for explanation, elucidation, exhortation, prophecy, and instruction, but does not bear the weight of ‘scripture’ in the LDS canon. Harold B. Lee was equally explicit:

If anyone, regardless of his position in the Church, were to advance a doctrine that is not substantiated by the standard Church works, meaning the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price, you may know that his statement is merely his private opinion. The only one authorized to bring forth any new doctrine is the President of the Church, who, when he does, will declare it as revelation from God, and it will be so accepted by the Council of the Twelve and sustained by the body of the Church. And if any man speak a doctrine which contradicts what is in the standard Church works, you may know by that same token that it is false and you are not bound to accept it as truth. [6]

Elsewhere, President Lee taught the same principle:

It is not to be thought that every word spoken by the General Authorities is inspired, or that they are moved upon by the Holy Ghost in everything they speak and write. Now you keep that in mind. I don't care what his position is, if he writes something or speaks something that goes beyond anything that you can find in the standard works, unless that one be the prophet, seer, and revelator—please note that one exception—you may immediately say, "Well, that is his own idea!" And if he says something that contradicts what is found in the standard works (I think that is why we call them "standard"—it is the standard measure of all that men teach), you may know by that same token that it is false; regardless of the position of the man who says it. [7]

In Mormon Doctrine, Elder Bruce R. McConkie was equally clear:

The books, writings, explanations, expositions, views, and theories of even the wisest and greatest men, either in or out of the Church, do not rank with the standard works. Even the writings, teachings, and opinions of the prophets of God are acceptable only to the extent they are in harmony with what God has revealed and what is recorded in the standard works. [8]

In areas in which the standard works are not clear, only the President of the Church may establish doctrine definitively:

But there are many places where the scriptures are not too clear, and where different interpretations may be given to them; there are many doctrines, tenets as the Lord called them, that have not been officially defined and declared. It is in the consideration and discussion of these scriptures and doctrines that opportunities arise for differences of views as to meanings and extent. In view of the fundamental principle just announced as to the position of the President of the Church, other bearers of the Priesthood, those with the special spiritual endowment and those without it, should be cautious in their expressions about and interpretations of scriptures and doctrines. They must act and teach subject to the over-all power and authority of the President of the Church. It would be most unfortunate were this not always strictly observed by the bearers of this special spiritual endowment, other than the President. Sometimes in the past they have spoken "out of turn," so to speak. Furthermore, at times even those not members of the General Authorities are said to have been heard to declare their own views on various matters concerning which no official view or declaration has been made by the mouthpiece of the Lord, sometimes with an assured certainty that might deceive the uninformed and unwary. [9]


Notes

  1. "Approaching Latter-day Saint Doctrine," Newsroom (May 2007)
  2. D. Todd Christofferson, "The Doctrine of Christ," April 2012 General Conference, Sunday Morning Session (1 Apr 2012)
  3. Neil L. Anderson, "Trial of Your Faith," Ensign (Nov 2012)
  4. George Q. Cannon, "Comments," Millennial Star 42 no. 46 (15 November 1880), 724. (10 October 1880, General Conference)
  5. Brigham H. Roberts, sermon of 10 July 1921, delivered in Salt Lake Tabernacle, printed in Deseret News (23 July 1921) sec. 4:7.
  6. Harold B. Lee, The First Area General Conference for Germany, Austria, Holland, Italy, Switzerland, France, Belgium, and Spain of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, held in Munich Germany, August 24–26, 1973, with Reports and Discourses, 69.
  7. Harold B. Lee, "The Place of the Living Prophet, Seer, and Revelator," Address to Seminary and Institute of Religion Faculty, BYU, 8 July 1964.
  8. Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 2nd edition, (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), 111. GL direct link
  9. J. Reuben Clark, “When Are the Writings or Sermons of Church Leaders Entitled to the Claim of Scripture,” address given to seminary and institute teachers at BYU, 7 July 1954, published in Church News (31 July 1954): 9–10; reprinted in Dialogue 12 (Summer 1979), 68–80.