FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Gee: "Ferguson is largely unknown to the vast majority of Latter-day Saints; his impact on Book of Mormon studies is minimal""
(→Gee: "Ferguson is largely unknown to the vast majority of Latter-day Saints; his impact on Book of Mormon studies is minimal") |
m (→top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}}) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Main Page}} |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | }} | ||
<onlyinclude> | <onlyinclude> | ||
==Gee: "Ferguson is largely unknown to the vast majority of Latter-day Saints; his impact on Book of Mormon studies is minimal"== | ==Gee: "Ferguson is largely unknown to the vast majority of Latter-day Saints; his impact on Book of Mormon studies is minimal"== | ||
| − | John Gee: <ref>John Gee, [ | + | John Gee: <ref>John Gee, [https://publications.mi.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1447&index=12 "The Hagiography of Doubting Thomas,"] ''FARMS Review of Books'' 10:2 (1998).</ref> |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Biographies like the book under review are deliberate, intentional acts; they do not occur by accident.4 Ferguson is largely unknown to the vast majority of Latter-day Saints; his impact on Book of Mormon studies is minimal.5 So, of all the lives that could be celebrated, why hold up that of a "double-acting sourpuss?"6 Is there anything admirable, virtuous, lovely, of good report, praiseworthy, or Christlike about Thomas Stuart Ferguson's apparent dishonesty or hypocrisy? Larson seems to think so: "I feel confident," Larson writes, "that Ferguson would want his intriguing story to be recounted as honestly and sympathetically as possible" (p. xiv). Why? Do we not have enough doubters? Yet Larson does not even intend to provide the reader with a full or complete biographical sketch of Ferguson's life, since he chose to include "almost nothing . . . concerning his professional career as a lawyer, his various real estate investments, his talent as a singer, his activities as a tennis player, or his family life" (p. xi). In his opening paragraph, Larson warns the reader that he is not interested in a well-rounded portrait of Ferguson. Nevertheless, he finds time to discourse on topics that do not deal with Ferguson's life and only tangentially with his research interest. | Biographies like the book under review are deliberate, intentional acts; they do not occur by accident.4 Ferguson is largely unknown to the vast majority of Latter-day Saints; his impact on Book of Mormon studies is minimal.5 So, of all the lives that could be celebrated, why hold up that of a "double-acting sourpuss?"6 Is there anything admirable, virtuous, lovely, of good report, praiseworthy, or Christlike about Thomas Stuart Ferguson's apparent dishonesty or hypocrisy? Larson seems to think so: "I feel confident," Larson writes, "that Ferguson would want his intriguing story to be recounted as honestly and sympathetically as possible" (p. xiv). Why? Do we not have enough doubters? Yet Larson does not even intend to provide the reader with a full or complete biographical sketch of Ferguson's life, since he chose to include "almost nothing . . . concerning his professional career as a lawyer, his various real estate investments, his talent as a singer, his activities as a tennis player, or his family life" (p. xi). In his opening paragraph, Larson warns the reader that he is not interested in a well-rounded portrait of Ferguson. Nevertheless, he finds time to discourse on topics that do not deal with Ferguson's life and only tangentially with his research interest. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 9: | ||
{{endnotes sources}} | {{endnotes sources}} | ||
| + | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
[[Category:Becoming Gods]] | [[Category:Becoming Gods]] | ||
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]] | [[Category:Letter to a CES Director]] | ||
| Line 19: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:The Kingdom of the Cults]] | [[Category:The Kingdom of the Cults]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[es:Fuente:Gee:FR 10:2:Ferguson es en gran parte desconocido para la gran mayoría de los Santos de los Últimos Días; su impacto en el Libro de Mormón estudios es mínimo]] | [[es:Fuente:Gee:FR 10:2:Ferguson es en gran parte desconocido para la gran mayoría de los Santos de los Últimos Días; su impacto en el Libro de Mormón estudios es mínimo]] | ||
[[pt:Fonte:Gee:FR 10:2:Ferguson é em grande parte desconhecido para a grande maioria dos Santos dos Últimos Dias; seu impacto no Livro de Mórmon estudos é mínima]] | [[pt:Fonte:Gee:FR 10:2:Ferguson é em grande parte desconhecido para a grande maioria dos Santos dos Últimos Dias; seu impacto no Livro de Mórmon estudos é mínima]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 13 April 2024
Gee: "Ferguson is largely unknown to the vast majority of Latter-day Saints; his impact on Book of Mormon studies is minimal"
John Gee: [1]
Biographies like the book under review are deliberate, intentional acts; they do not occur by accident.4 Ferguson is largely unknown to the vast majority of Latter-day Saints; his impact on Book of Mormon studies is minimal.5 So, of all the lives that could be celebrated, why hold up that of a "double-acting sourpuss?"6 Is there anything admirable, virtuous, lovely, of good report, praiseworthy, or Christlike about Thomas Stuart Ferguson's apparent dishonesty or hypocrisy? Larson seems to think so: "I feel confident," Larson writes, "that Ferguson would want his intriguing story to be recounted as honestly and sympathetically as possible" (p. xiv). Why? Do we not have enough doubters? Yet Larson does not even intend to provide the reader with a full or complete biographical sketch of Ferguson's life, since he chose to include "almost nothing . . . concerning his professional career as a lawyer, his various real estate investments, his talent as a singer, his activities as a tennis player, or his family life" (p. xi). In his opening paragraph, Larson warns the reader that he is not interested in a well-rounded portrait of Ferguson. Nevertheless, he finds time to discourse on topics that do not deal with Ferguson's life and only tangentially with his research interest.
Notes
- ↑ John Gee, "The Hagiography of Doubting Thomas," FARMS Review of Books 10:2 (1998).