|
|
| (21 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{FME-Source
| + | #REDIRECT[[Alleged_false_prophecies_of_Joseph_Smith#Did_Joseph_Smith_state_that_the_moon_was_inhabited.2C_and_that_it.27s_inhabitants_were_dressed_like_Quakers.3F]] |
| − | |title=Question: Did Joseph Smith state that the moon was inhabited, and it's inhabitants were dressed like Quakers?
| |
| − | |category=Joseph Smith
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | <onlyinclude>
| |
| − | ==Question: Did Joseph Smith state that the moon was inhabited, and it's inhabitants were dressed like Quakers?==
| |
| − | ===This is not a quote from Joseph Smith, but rather a late, third-hand account of something that Joseph is supposed to have said===
| |
| | | | |
| − | The source for this claim is not Joseph Smith himself; the first mention comes in 1881 in Oliver B. Huntington's journal, who claimed that he had the information from Philo Dibble. So, we have a late, third-hand account of something Joseph is supposed to have said. <ref>{{Sunstone1|author=Van Hale|article=Mormons And Moonmen|vol=7|num=5|date=September/October 1982|start=13|end=14}}</ref> Hyrum Smith <ref>Hyrum Smith, "Concerning the plurality of gods & worlds," 27 April 1843; cited in {{BYUS1|author=Eugene England (editor)|article=George Laub's Nauvoo Journal|vol=18|num=2|date=Winter 1978|start=177}}{{link|url=http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cgi-bin/docviewer.exe?CISOROOT=/byustudies&CISOPTR=25583&CISOSHOW=22264}}</ref> and Brigham Young <ref>{{JDfairwiki|author=Brigham Young|title=The Gospel—The One-Man Power|date=24 July 1870|vol=13|disc=31|start=271|end=271}}</ref> both expressed their view that the moon was inhabited.
| + | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> |
| | | | |
| − | A patriarchal blessing given to Huntington also indicated that "thou shalt have power with God even to translate thyself to Heaven, & preach to the inhabitants of the moon or planets, if it shall be expedient." <ref>''Patriarchal Blessings Books'' 9:294–295.</ref>
| |
| | | | |
| − | Huntington later wrote an article about the concept for a Church magazine:
| + | [[Category:Facts Mormons Won't Tell You When They Call at Your Door]] |
| | + | [[Category:One Nation Under Gods]] |
| | + | [[Category:The Changing World of Mormonism]] |
| | + | [[Category:Difficult Questions for Mormons]] |
| | + | [[Category:Facts Mormons Won't Tell You]] |
| | | | |
| − | <blockquote>
| + | [[de:Frage: Hat Joseph Smith gelehrt, dass der Mond bewohnt ist?]] |
| − | As far back as 1837, I know that he [Joseph Smith] said the moon was inhabited by men and women the same as this earth, and that they lived to a greater age than we do -- that they live generally to near the age of a 1,000 years.
| + | [[fi:Kysymys: Sanoiko Joseph Smith, että kuu oli asutettu ja että niiden asukkaat oli puettu kveekaroiden tapaan?]] |
| − | | + | [[Category:Questions]] |
| − | He described the men as averaging nearly six feet in height, and dressing quite uniformly in something near the Quaker style. <ref>''Young Woman's Journal'' (1892) 3: 263.</ref>
| |
| − | </blockquote>
| |
| − | | |
| − | So, it would seem that the idea of an inhabited moon or other celestial body was not foreign to at least some early LDS members. It is not clear whether the idea originated with Joseph Smith.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===In the 1800s, the idea that the moon was inhabited was considered scientific fact by many===
| |
| − | | |
| − | However, it should be remembered that this concept was considered 'scientific fact' by many at the time. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Herschel William Herschel], the discoverer of the planet Uranus, died in 1822. Herschel argued "[w]ho can say that it is not extremely probable, nay beyond doubt, that there must be inhabitants on the Moon of some kind or another?" Furthermore, "he thought it possible that there was a region below the Sun's fiery surface where men might live, and he regarded the existence of life on the Moon as 'an absolute certainty.'" <ref> Patrick Moore, ''New Guide to the Moon'' (W.W. Norton & Company, New York: 1976), cited by {{Sunstone1|author=Van Hale|article=Mormons And Moonmen|vol=7|num=5|date=September/October 1982|start=15}}</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | Other scientists announced that they had discovered "a lunar city with a collection of gigantic ramparts extending 23 miles in either direction." <ref>Van Hale, "Mormons And Moonmen," 15.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===The 1835 Great Moon Hoax added to the belief in lunar inhabitants===
| |
| − | | |
| − | In addition to these pronouncements from some of the most prominent scientists of the day, a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Moon_Hoax clever hoax] in 1835 only added to the belief in lunar inhabitants.
| |
| − | | |
| − | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Frederick_William_Herschel John Herschel], son of the famous William, went to South Africa to study stars visible only in the southern hemisphere. This was the cause of considerable public interest, given Herschel's involvement. (William Herschel was the preeminent astronomer of his generation. He had discovered Uranus, and was also of the view that the moon was inhabited. <ref>Holmes, 464.</ref> | |
| − | | |
| − | On 23 August 1835, Richard Locke published the first article in the ''New York Sun'' of what purported to be reports from Herschel's observations. Over a total of [http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/moonhoax1.html six installments], Locke claimed that Herschel was reporting lunar flowers, forests, bison, goats, unicorns, bipedal tailless beavers who cooked with fire, and (most provocatively) flying men with wings:
| |
| − | | |
| − | <blockquote>
| |
| − | They appeared to be constantly engaged in conversing, with much impassioned gesticulation; and hence it was inferred, that they are rational beings. Others, apparently of a higher order, were discovered afterwards. . . . And finally a magnificent temple for the worship of God, of polished sapphire, in a triangle shape, with a roof of gold. <ref>Moore, ''New Guide to the Moon'' 130–131; cited by Van Hale, "Mormons And Moonmen," 16.</ref>
| |
| − | </blockquote>
| |
| − | | |
| − | These reports were widely believed and caused a minor sensation. They were carried in the ''Painsville Telegraph'', adjacent to Mormon Kirtland. <ref>''Painesville Telegraph'' (11 September 1835).</ref> The ''Sun'' eventually hinted that the matter was a hoax:
| |
| − | | |
| − | <blockquote>
| |
| − | Certain correspondents have been urging us to come out and confess the whole to be a hoax; but this we can by no means do, until we have the testimony of the English or Scotch papers to corroborate such a declaration. <ref>''New York Sun'' 16 September 1835; cited by Alex Boese, "The Great Moon Hoax," ''museumofhoaxes.com''{{link|url=http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/moonhoax.htm}}</ref>
| |
| − | </blockquote>
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Popular belief in lunar inhabitants persisted for decades after the hoax===
| |
| − | | |
| − | No more than this was forthcoming, and the ''Painsville Telegraph'' made no mention of the possibility of a hoax. Popular belief in lunar inhabitants persisted for decades. Herschel initially found the episode amusing, but he eventually grew frustrated with having to continually explain to the public that the whole matter was a hoax, with which he had nothing to do: he would later refer "the whole affair as 'incoherent ravings'". <ref>Richard Holmes, ''The Age of Wonder'' (London: Harper Press, 2008), 199.</ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | In a private letter, Hirschel's wife indicated how skillfully the hoax was carried out:
| |
| − | | |
| − | <blockquote>
| |
| − | Margaret Herschel was more amused. She called the story 'a very clever peice of imagination,' and wrote appreciately..."The whole description is so well ''clenched'' with minute details of workmanship...that the New Yorkists were not to be blamed for actually believing it as they did...." <ref>Holmes, 465, {{io}}.</ref>
| |
| − | </blockquote>
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Modern prophets and general authorities will sometimes cite newspaper articles or books to illustrate the points which they wish to make===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Church publications did not shy from embracing later scientific findings on the matter:
| |
| − | | |
| − | <blockqutoe>
| |
| − | “As there is no air nor water on the moon, but very few changes can take place upon its surface. There can be no vegetation and no animals, and although many astronomers have brought their imaginations to bear upon this subject, and have given us descriptions of the beautiful scenery upon its surface, and have even peopled it with inhabitants, we have every reason to believe that it is as barren and lifeless as an arid rock” (‘Quebec,’ “The Moon”, ''Contributor'' 1/9 (June 1880): 193-5, from page 195)
| |
| − | </blockquote>
| |
| − | | |
| − | Modern prophets and general authorities will sometimes cite newspaper articles or books to illustrate the points which they wish to make. In doing so, they are not endorsing such articles or books as being prophetically correct in all particulars. Rather, they are using the science and information of their day to enhance their preaching of the gospel.
| |
| − | | |
| − | LDS doctrine was not provincial, since it provided for "worlds without number" ({{s||Moses|1|33}}) created by Christ. These worlds held those who would require the gospel, since by Christ "the inhabitants thereof are begotten sons and daughters unto God." ({{s||DC|76|24}})
| |
| − | | |
| − | Information given to the 19th century Saints by the authorities of the day were consistent with these doctrines, and so they believed them, and occasionally mentioned them in a religious context. As always, prophets and believers are products of their time. Biblical authors, for example, clearly accepted a geocentric (earth centered) cosmos, with a flat earth and heavens supported by four pillars. Like the authors of the Bible, modern prophets are generally beholden to their era's scientific concepts, except where corrections in those concepts are needed to permit the gospel to be understood and applied. This does not mean, however, that prophets of any era do not receive revelation about matters of eternal significance.
| |
| − | </onlyinclude>
| |
| − | {{endnotes sources}}
| |
