|
|
| (20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
| + | #REDIRECT [[Joseph Smith/Legal issues]] |
| − | {{Resource Title|Joseph Smith legal issues: Trials}}
| |
| − | {{JosephSmithPortal}}
| |
| − | {{Summary}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | == ==
| |
| − | {{Topics label}}
| |
| − | <onlyinclude>
| |
| − | {{SummaryHeader
| |
| − | |link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials
| |
| − | |subject=Joseph Smith and legal trials
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{SummaryItem
| |
| − | |link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials/1826 glasslooking trial
| |
| − | |subject=1826 trial for "glasslooking"
| |
| − | |summary=Joseph Smith was brought to trial in 1826 for "glasslooking." Didn't Hugh Nibley claim that if this trial record existed that it would be "the most damning evidence in existence against Joseph Smith?"
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{SummaryItem
| |
| − | |link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials/1826 glasslooking trial/Con man
| |
| − | |subject=Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"?
| |
| − | |summary=Was Joseph convicted of being a "con man" in a court of law in 1826?
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | </onlyinclude>
| |
| − | {{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[es:José Smith/Cuestiones legales/Juicios legales]]
| |
| − | [[pt:Joseph Smith/Questões legais/Processos judiciais]]
| |
