Difference between revisions of "Question: Was the text of the Book of Abraham received through revelation?"

m ()
m (top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{Main Page}}
{{Resource Title|Book of Abraham as text received through revelation}}
+
<onlyinclude>
{{BofAPortal}}
+
==Question: Was the text of the Book of Abraham received through revelation?==
== ==
+
===This theory assumes that the Book of Abraham ''was not'' on the papyri; he received the text by revelation, with the papyri acting as a catalyst===
{{criticism label}}
 
  
*Was the text of the Book of Abraham received through revelation?
+
Did the papyri simply serve as a catalyst to prompt such a revelation?
*Did the papyri simply serve as a catalyst to prompt such a revelation?
+
 
 +
This theory assumes that the Book of Abraham ''was not'' on the papyri; he received the text by revelation, with the papyri acting as a catalyst. This is a possibility because Joseph used the word "translation" to mean several things, including the process of receiving pure revelation. (Joseph Smith's revelations call his revision of the Bible a "translation" ({{s||D&C|73|4}}; {{sv||D&C|76|15}}; {{sv||D&C|90|13}}; {{sv||D&C|94|10}}; {{sv||D&C|124|89}}), even though he didn't use any Hebrew of Greek manuscripts. Also, {{s||D&C|7|}} is a revealed translation of a lost record written by the Apostle John.)
 +
 
 +
</onlyinclude>
 +
{{endnotes sources}}
  
== ==
 
{{ChurchResponseBar
 
|link=https://www.lds.org/topics/translation-and-historicity-of-the-book-of-abraham
 
|title=Translation and Historicity of the Book of Abraham
 
|publication=Gospel Topics on LDS.org
 
|date=8 July 2014
 
|summary=Alternatively, Joseph’s study of the papyri may have led to a revelation about key events and teachings in the life of Abraham, much as he had earlier received a revelation about the life of Moses while studying the Bible. This view assumes a broader definition of the words translator and translation.33 According to this view, Joseph’s translation was not a literal rendering of the papyri as a conventional translation would be. Rather, the physical artifacts provided an occasion for meditation, reflection, and revelation. They catalyzed a process whereby God gave to Joseph Smith a revelation about the life of Abraham, even if that revelation did not directly correlate to the characters on the papyri.
 
}}
 
  
== ==
 
{{Response label}}
 
  
This theory assumes that the Book of Abraham ''was not'' on the papyri; he received the text by revelation, with the papyri acting as a catalyst. This is a possibility because Joseph used the word "translation" to mean several things, including the process of receiving pure revelation. (Joseph Smith's revelations call his revision of the Bible a "translation" ({{s||D&C|73|4}}; {{sv||D&C|76|15}}; {{sv||D&C|90|13}}; {{sv||D&C|94|10}}; {{sv||D&C|124|89}}), even though he didn't use any Hebrew of Greek manuscripts. Also, {{s||D&C|7|}} is a revealed translation of a lost record written by the Apostle John.)
+
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
  
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 
 
[[es:El Libro de Abraham/Papiros de José Smith/Texto/Revelado]]
 
[[es:El Libro de Abraham/Papiros de José Smith/Texto/Revelado]]
 +
[[Category:Questions]]

Latest revision as of 15:29, 13 April 2024


Question: Was the text of the Book of Abraham received through revelation?

This theory assumes that the Book of Abraham was not on the papyri; he received the text by revelation, with the papyri acting as a catalyst

Did the papyri simply serve as a catalyst to prompt such a revelation?

This theory assumes that the Book of Abraham was not on the papyri; he received the text by revelation, with the papyri acting as a catalyst. This is a possibility because Joseph used the word "translation" to mean several things, including the process of receiving pure revelation. (Joseph Smith's revelations call his revision of the Bible a "translation" (D&C 73꞉4; 76꞉15; 90꞉13; 94꞉10; 124꞉89), even though he didn't use any Hebrew of Greek manuscripts. Also, D&C 7 is a revealed translation of a lost record written by the Apostle John.)


Notes