|
|
| (8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
| + | #REDIRECT [[Question: Was Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible ever completed?]] |
| − | {{Resource Title|Was the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible ever completed?}}
| |
| − | <onlyinclude>
| |
| − | {{epigraph|We have heard President Brigham Young state that the Prophet, before his death, had spoken to him about going through the translation of the scriptures again and perfecting it upon points of doctrine which the Lord had restrained him from giving in plainness and fullness at the time of which we write.<br><br?—George Q. Cannon, ''The Life of Joseph Smith'' (Salt Lake City: Juvenile Instructor Office, 1888), 142.
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{parabreak}}
| |
| − | == ==
| |
| − | {{Criticism label}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | It is not known for certain whether or not Joseph Smith completed his revisions to the Bible.
| |
| − | *One critical website poses the question: "Why didn’t the next prophet, or any subsequent prophet, finish the inspired version of the Bible that the church thought was so important that they altered our version of the King James Bible to include the portions that Joseph did retranslate? Does it make any sense that the inspired version of the Bible should not be finished merely with the death of the first prophet of the restoration? If we really did have a succession of prophets since Joseph Smith, this important work would have been finished and published as God commanded Joseph to do." <ref>"JST Bible Translation," MormonThink.com <nowiki>http://mormonthink.com/jst.htm#full</nowiki></ref>
| |
| − | | |
| − | == ==
| |
| − | {{Conclusion label}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | The JST (or "Inspired Version") is probably better seen as a type of inspired commentary on the Bible text by Joseph. Its value consists not in making it the new "official" scripture, but in the insights Joseph provides readers and ''what Joseph himself learned'' during the process. As such, it would never actually be "finished."
| |
| − | | |
| − | * However, the fact that Joseph was collecting funds to publish what we call the JST suggests that he believed it was sufficiently advanced to be published.
| |
| − | * Joseph did not view his revisions to the Bible as a "once and for all" or "finally completed translation" goal. The translation could be acceptable for purposes, but still subject to later clarification or elaboration.
| |
| − | * There was no attempt to canonize the JST then, or now.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Most important to note, the JST or other scriptures are not the ultimate source of LDS doctrine—having a living prophet is what is most vital. Joseph improved his prophetic capacity through the production of the JST.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == ==
| |
| − | {{Response label}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | Two main points to keep in mind regarding the Joseph Smith "translation" of the Bible:
| |
| − | | |
| − | First, the JST is not intended primarily or solely as restoration of text. Unimpeachably orthodox LDS scholars who have focused on the JST (such as Robert J. Matthews and Kent Jackson) are unanimous in this regard. The assumption that it *is* intended primarily or solely as a restoration of text is what leads to expectations that the JST and Book of Mormon should match up in every case. At times the JST does not even match up with itself, such as when Joseph Smith translated the same passage multiple times in different ways. This does not undermine notions of revelation, but certainly challenges common assumptions about the nature and function of the JST and the Book of Mormon translation.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Second, one of the main tendencies of the JST is harmonization. You may be aware of differences in Jesus' sayings between different Gospels. For example, Jesus' statements about whether divorce is permitted and under what conditions differ significantly. Matthew offers an exception clause that Mark and Luke do not, and this has severely complicated the historical interpretation of Jesus' view of divorce.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The JST often makes changes that harmonize one gospel with another, which is what your example does. While one gospel says "judge not" (though this may not be as absolute as you make it out to be) John 7:24 has Jesus commanding to "judge righteous judgment." The JST change harmonizes the two gospels by making Matthew agree with John. If indeed "there is a very real difference in commanding to "Judge righteously" and to "Judge not" at all" then it is a problem inherently present in the differing accounts of the Gospels, which the JST resolves in a particular way.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == ==
| |
| − | {{endnotes label}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | <references/>
| |
| − | </onlyinclude>
| |
| − | {{Articles Footer 1}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[Category:MormonThink]]
| |
