Difference between revisions of "Question: Are study aids in Mormon scriptures considered binding or authoritative?"

(m)
m (top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{Main Page}}
{{Resource Title|Are study aids in LDS scriptures considered binding or authoritative?}}
+
<onlyinclude>
 
+
==Question: Are study aids in Mormon scriptures considered binding or authoritative?==
=Study helps=
+
===McConkie: "None of these are perfect; they do not of themselves determine doctrine; there have been and undoubtedly now are mistakes in them"===
 
 
== ==
 
{{Question label}}
 
  
 
Are study aids (e.g., the Topical Guide, Bible Dictionary, footnotes, etc.) in LDS scriptures considered binding or authoritative?
 
Are study aids (e.g., the Topical Guide, Bible Dictionary, footnotes, etc.) in LDS scriptures considered binding or authoritative?
  
== ==
+
Elder Bruce R. McConkie, who supervised the preparation of many of the LDS study aides said this:
{{Conclusion label}}
 
  
Elder Bruce R. McConkie, who supervised the preparation of many of the LDS study aides said this:
+
<blockquote>
 +
[As for the] Joseph Smith Translation items, the chapter headings, Topical Guide, Bible Dictionary, footnotes, the Gazeteer, and the maps. None of these are perfect; they do not of themselves determine doctrine; there have been and undoubtedly now are mistakes in them. Cross-references, for instance, do not establish and never were intended to prove that parallel passages so much as pertain to the same subject. They are aids and helps only. <ref>{{Book:McConkie:Doctrines of the Restoration|pages=289&ndash;290}}</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
  
:[As for the] Joseph Smith Translation items, the chapter headings, Topical Guide, Bible Dictionary, footnotes, the Gazeteer, and the maps. None of these are perfect; they do not of themselves determine doctrine; there have been and undoubtedly now are mistakes in them. Cross-references, for instance, do not establish and never were intended to prove that parallel passages so much as pertain to the same subject. They are aids and helps only. <ref>{{Book:McConkie:Doctrines of the Restoration|pages=289&ndash;290}}</ref>
+
</onlyinclude>
 +
{{endnotes sources}}
  
== ==
 
{{Endnotes label}}
 
  
<references/>
 
  
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
+
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 +
[[Category:Questions]]

Latest revision as of 15:10, 13 April 2024


Question: Are study aids in Mormon scriptures considered binding or authoritative?

McConkie: "None of these are perfect; they do not of themselves determine doctrine; there have been and undoubtedly now are mistakes in them"

Are study aids (e.g., the Topical Guide, Bible Dictionary, footnotes, etc.) in LDS scriptures considered binding or authoritative?

Elder Bruce R. McConkie, who supervised the preparation of many of the LDS study aides said this:

[As for the] Joseph Smith Translation items, the chapter headings, Topical Guide, Bible Dictionary, footnotes, the Gazeteer, and the maps. None of these are perfect; they do not of themselves determine doctrine; there have been and undoubtedly now are mistakes in them. Cross-references, for instance, do not establish and never were intended to prove that parallel passages so much as pertain to the same subject. They are aids and helps only. [1]


Notes

  1. Mark McConkie (editor), Doctrines of the Restoration: Sermons and Writings of Bruce R. McConkie (Salt Lake City, Utah: Bookcraft, 1989), 289–290. ISBN 978-0884946441. GL direct link