|
|
(41 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
| + | #REDIRECT[[Plural marriage and the law]] |
− | {{Resource Title|Was the practice of polygamy against the law?}}
| |
− | {{PolygamyPortal}}
| |
− | <onlyinclude>
| |
− | {{epigraph|A question has many times been asked of the Church and of its individual members, to this effect: In the case of a conflict between the requirements made by the revealed word of God, and those imposed by the secular law, which of these authorities would the members of the Church be bound to obey?…Pending the overruling by Providence in favor of religious liberty, it is the duty of the saints to submit themselves to the laws of their country. <br><br>{{AoF|start=382|end=383}}
| |
− | }}
| |
− | {{parabreak}}
| |
− | == ==
| |
− | {{Criticism label}}
| |
− | | |
− | *Was the practice of polygamy against the law?
| |
− | *Does the Church ''teach'' or ''claim'' that polygamy was not against the law?
| |
− | | |
− | <noinclude>{{CriticalSources}}</noinclude>
| |
− | | |
− | == ==
| |
− | {{Conclusion label}}
| |
− | | |
− | Polygamy was certainly declared illegal during the Utah-era anti-polygamy crusade, and was arguably illegal under the Illinois anti-bigamy statutes.
| |
− | | |
− | The Church believes in honoring and sustaining the law, but it does not believe that members must surrender their religious beliefs or conscience to the state. Not surprisingly, the question comes down to whether Joseph was a Prophet and whether God commanded his actions.
| |
− | | |
− | Just because some members have come up with uninformed opinions about plural marriage, is this the Church's fault? The Church doesn't include any of these claims in its manuals.
| |
− | | |
− | == ==
| |
− | {{PerspectivesBar
| |
− | |link=http://www.fairmormon.org/perspectives/publications/polygamy-prophets-and-prevarication
| |
− | |author=Gregory L. Smith, M.D.
| |
− | |authorlink=http://www.fairmormon.org/perspectives/authors/smith-gregory
| |
− | |title=Polygamy, Prophets, and Prevarication: Frequently and Rarely Asked Questions about the Initiation, Practice, and Cessation of Plural Marriage in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
| |
− | |publication=FairMormon Papers
| |
− | |date=2005
| |
− | |summary=Critics charge that the Church and its members participated in polygamy in violation of both state and federal laws. It is therefore argued that the Church abandoned its commitment to “obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.”8 Critics, however, make such arguments without a full understanding of the legal considerations of the day and without understanding how civil disobedience plays into the picture.
| |
− | }}
| |
− | | |
− | == ==
| |
− | {{Response label}}
| |
− | | |
− | This is hardly new information, and Church members and their critics knew it. Modern members of the Church generally miss the significance of this fact, however: the practice of polygamy was a clear case of civil disobedience.
| |
− | | |
− | :The decision to defy the [anti-polygamy laws] was a painful exception to an otherwise firm commitment to the rule of law and order. Significantly, however, in choosing to defy the law, the Latter-day Saints were actually following in an American tradition of civil disobedience. On various previous occasions, including the years before the Revolutionary War, Americans had found certain laws offensive to their fundamental values and had decided openly to violate them.…Even though declared constitutional, the law was still repugnant to all [the Saints’] values, and they were willing to face harassment, exile, or imprisonment rather than bow to its demands. <ref>{{StoryOfLDS1|start=401}}</ref>
| |
− | | |
− | Elder James E. Talmage taught that members should obey the law, unless God commanded an exception:
| |
− | | |
− | :A question has many times been asked of the Church and of its individual members, to this effect: In the case of a conflict between the requirements made by the revealed word of God, and those imposed by the secular law, which of these authorities would the members of the Church be bound to obey?…Pending the overruling by Providence in favor of religious liberty, it is the duty of the saints to submit themselves to the laws of their country. <ref>{{AoF|start=382|end=383}}</ref>
| |
− | | |
− | == ==
| |
− | {{Endnotes label}}
| |
− | | |
− | <references/>
| |
− | | |
− | </onlyinclude>
| |
− | | |
− | {{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
| |
− | [[de:Joseph Smith und Polygamie/illegal]]
| |
− | [[fr:Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal]]
| |
− | | |
− | [[Category:MormonThink]]
| |