Difference between revisions of "Mormonism and priesthood/Restoration"

(: m)
m (top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{Main Page}}  
{{Resource Title|Priesthood restoration}}
 
{{EarlyChristianityPortal}}
 
== ==
 
{{Criticism label}}
 
 
 
*It is claimed by some Christians that no restoration of priesthood authority was required.
 
*Was the "laying on of hands" necessary in order to receive priesthood authority?
 
*Did the concept of priesthood authority and ordinations actually come from Sidney Rigdon?
 
 
 
{{CriticalSources}}
 
 
 
== ==
 
{{Conclusion label}}
 
 
Clearly, the conferral and proper transfer of authority is of key importance within the Old and New Testaments.  One must accept one of two positions: either this authority continued, unbroken, through the Church of the Middle Ages down to the present day, or the authority was lost and a restoration was necessary.  Priesthood authority from designated sources was a common theme in the Old and New Testaments, and ought to be continued into the modern Church.
 
 
 
 
 
== ==
 
{{Topics label}}
 
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
{{SummaryHeader
+
{{H1
|link=Mormonism and priesthood/Restoration
+
|L=Mormonism and priesthood/Restoration
|subject=Restoration of the priesthood authority
+
|H=Restoration of the priesthood
|summary=It is claimed that no restoration of priesthood authority was required, and that the "laying on of hands" is not necessary in order to receive priesthood authority. Some claim that the concept of priesthood authority and ordinations came from Sidney Rigdon.
+
|S=
}}
+
|L1=The manner in which the priesthood was restored
{{SummaryItem
+
|L2=Date of the restoration of the Melchizedek priesthood
|link=Mormonism and priesthood/Restoration/Aaronic
 
|subject=Aaronic priesthood
 
|summary=
 
}}
 
{{SummaryItem2
 
|link=Mormonism and priesthood/Restoration/Aaronic/Hebrews 7
 
|subject=Hebrews 7 and the Aaronic priesthood
 
|summary=Hebrews 7 states that the Aaronic/Levitical Priesthood was "changed" to the unique priesthood "after the order of Melchizedek" held by Jesus Christ. Why then do Mormons still use the Aaronic Priesthood?
 
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Mormonism and priesthood/Restoration/Melchizedek
 
|subject=Melchizedek priesthood
 
|summary=
 
}}
 
{{SummaryItem2
 
|link=Mormonism and priesthood/Restoration/Melchizedek/Date
 
|subject=Date of the restoration of the Melchizedek priesthood
 
|summary=Some have claimed that the restoration of the priesthood was "back dated" later by Joseph Smith to justify his desire to dominate the Church. Critics also claim that no one seems to know "when or how" Joseph Smith received the Melchizedek priesthood.
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>
 +
{{:Mormonism and priesthood/Manner in which the priesthood was restored}}
 +
{{:Mormonism and priesthood/Restoration/Melchizedek/Date}}
 +
<embedvideo service="youtube">DCde2ZHDxns</embedvideo>
  
== ==
+
{{endnotes sources}}
{{Response label}}
+
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
 
Some do not believe that any 'divine authority' was deemed necessary by the apostles or early Christians to act in the name of God.  This section briefly explores several Biblical instances in which authority is clearly given and clearly required to act in God's name.
 
 
 
===Religious authority not given to everyone in Old Testament times===
 
In Old Testament times, the authority to act in a religious capacity did not belong to everyone.  Even kings could not act as priests of the Lord without authority:
 
 
 
''Samuel and Saul''
 
 
 
:8 ¶ And he tarried seven days, according to the set time that Samuel had appointed: but Samuel came not to Gilgal; and the people were scattered from him. 9 And Saul said, Bring hither a burnt offering to me, and peace offerings.  And he offered the burnt offering. 10 And it came to pass, that as soon as he had made an end of offering the burnt offering, behold, Samuel came; and Saul went out to meet him, that he might salute him. 11 ¶ And Samuel said, What hast thou done?  And Saul said, Because I saw that the people were scattered from me, and that thou camest not within the days appointed, and that the Philistines gathered themselves together at Michmash; 12 Therefore said I, The Philistines will come down now upon me to Gilgal, and I have not made supplication unto the LORD: I forced myself therefore, and offered a burnt offering. 13 And Samuel said to Saul, Thou hast done foolishly: thou hast not kept the commandment of the LORD thy God, which he commanded thee: for now would the LORD have established thy kingdom upon Israel for ever. 14 But now thy kingdom shall not continue: the LORD hath sought him a man after his own heart, and the LORD hath commanded him to be captain over his people, because thou hast not kept that which the LORD commanded thee.([http://scriptures.lds.org/1_sam/13/11#14 1 Samuel 13:11&ndash;14]).
 
 
 
''King Uzziah''
 
:18 And they withstood Uzziah the king, and said unto him, It appertaineth not unto thee, Uzziah, to burn incense unto the LORD, but to the priests the sons of Aaron, that are consecrated to burn incense: go out of the sanctuary; for thou hast trespassed; neither shall it be for thine honour from the LORD God. 19 Then Uzziah was wroth, and had a censer in his hand to burn incense: and while he was wroth with the priests, the leprosy even rose up in his forehead before the priests in the house of the LORD, from beside the incense altar.([http://scriptures.lds.org/2_chr/26/18#19 2 Chronicles 26:18&ndash;19]).
 
 
 
===The Bible teaches that priests were called by God through a prophet===
 
Priests in the Old Testament were called by God through a prophet, and the New Testament letter to the Hebrews teaches that the same principle applies.
 
 
 
The letter to the Hebrews teaches that no one 'takes the honor' of acting for God without being called in the same way as Aaron was:
 
 
 
:1 FOR every high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins: 2 Who can have compassion on the ignorant, and on them that are out of the way; for that he himself also is compassed with infirmity. 3 And by reason hereof he ought, as for the people, so also for himself, to offer for sins. 4 And no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is called of God, as was Aaron.([http://scriptures.lds.org/heb/5/1#4 Hebrews 5:1&ndash;4]).
 
 
 
How was Aaron chosen?  By direct revelation from God to a prophet:
 
 
 
:And take thou unto thee Aaron thy brother, and his sons with him, from among the children of Israel, that he may minister unto me in the priest's office, even Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar, Aaron's sons.([http://scriptures.lds.org/ex/28/1#1 Exodus 28:1]).
 
 
 
===Jesus gave authority to the Twelve apostles and others===
 
Jesus clearly delegated authority to the Twelve apostles and to others in order to authorize them to act in His name:
 
 
 
:And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of sickness and all manner of disease.([http://scriptures.lds.org/matt/10/1#1 Matthew 10:1]).
 
:After these things the Lord appointed other seventy also, and sent them two and two before his face into every city and place, whither he himself would come.([http://scriptures.lds.org/luke/10/1#1 Luke 10:1]).
 
 
 
===Jesus clearly stated that he was giving authority to the apostles===
 
Jesus made it clear that those whom he called had been given authority:
 
 
 
:For the Son of man is as a man taking a far journey, who left his house, and gave authority to his servants, and to every man his work, and commanded the porter to watch.([http://scriptures.lds.org/mark/13/34#34 Mark 13:34]).
 
 
 
:And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19  And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.([http://scriptures.lds.org/matt/16/18#18 Matthew 16:18]).
 
 
 
===A new apostle was chosen by the remaining members of the Twelve===
 
Following the death of Judas, the apostles met to choose a new apostle: thus, the Twelve apostles were meant to continue as a group, and new members were to be called by revelation from God:
 
 
 
:Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22  Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection. 23  And they appointed two, Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias. 24  And they prayed, and said, Thou, Lord, which knowest the hearts of all men, shew whether of these two thou hast chosen, 25 That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.([http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/1/21#25 Acts 1:21&ndash;25]).
 
 
 
===The apostles transferred authority by the laying on of hands===
 
The apostles themselves called others to assist them and gave them authority by laying on of hands.  These men did not select themselves, and they did not begin to act as assistants to the Apostles until they were given authority:
 
 
 
:1 AND in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplied, there arose a murmuring of the Grecians against the Hebrews, because their widows were neglected in the daily ministration. 2 Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said, It is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables. 3 Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business. 4 But we will give ourselves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the word. 5 ¶ And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolas a proselyte of Antioch: 6 Whom they set before the apostles: and when they had prayed, they laid their hands on them.([http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/6/1#6 Acts 6:1&ndash;6]).
 
 
 
Paul and Barnabas were chosen in the same manner: those with authority received revelation from God (via the Holy Ghost) about who should be chosen, and then gave them authority by the laying on of hands:
 
 
 
:2 As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy Ghost said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them. 3 And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away.([http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/13/2#3 Acts 13:2&ndash;3]).
 
 
 
The ability to give the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands was clearly understood to be a power from God that had to be conferred: 
 
 
 
:18 And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money, 19 Saying, Give me also this power, that on whomsoever I lay hands, he may receive the Holy Ghost. 20 But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money. 21 Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God. 22 Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee. 23 For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity.([http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/8/18#23 Acts 8:18&ndash;23]).
 
 
 
Simon the magician tried to buy the power, and was rebuked by Peter: notice, though, that Simon understands very clearly that he cannot do what the apostles are doing without the authority: he simply tries to get the authority in the wrong way.
 
 
 
===Jesus taught that one does not choose himself to receive authority===
 
Jesus taught that one does not choose himself to receive His authority.  Jesus chooses those whom He will, and then has the recipient ordained (by Himself or by someone with delegated authority, as the apostles did):
 
 
 
:Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.([http://scriptures.lds.org/john/15/16#16 John 15:16]).
 
 
 
The Bible later illustrates, in conjunction with this principle, that using the name of Christ or having good intentions does not confer the authority which He gave.  Witness what happens when someone without authority from Christ tries to do what the apostles do:
 
 
 
:13 ¶ Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, took upon them to call over them which had evil spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, We adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preacheth. 14 And there were seven sons of one Sceva, a Jew, and chief of the priests, which did so. 15 And the evil spirit answered and said, Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye? 16 And the man in whom the evil spirit was leaped on them, and overcame them, and prevailed against them, so that they fled out of that house naked and wounded.([http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/19/13#16 Acts 19:13&ndash;16])
 
 
 
Here the Jews use the name of Christ, use the same type of language as used by the apostles, and even use the name of an apostle (Paul).  They are trying to do a good thing: to cast out an evil spirit.  However, they have no authority from God: they lack the power given to the apostles by Jesus, and later given to others (such as Paul).
 
  
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
+
[[de:Mormonismus und Priestertum/Wiederherstellung]]
[[de:Wiederherstellung des Priestertums]]
 
 
[[es:El Mormonismo y el sacerdocio/La restauración]]
 
[[es:El Mormonismo y el sacerdocio/La restauración]]
[[fr:Priesthood/Restoration]]
+
[[pt:Mormonismo e sacerdócio/A restauração]]

Latest revision as of 14:03, 13 April 2024


Restoration of the priesthood


Jump to Subtopic:


The manner in which the priesthood was restored


Jump to details:


Articles about Joseph Smith

What is the date of the restoration of the Melchizedek Priesthood?

There is a narrow May 15 to 30, 1829 ordination window

Knowing that the prophet already had the Melchizedek priesthood prior to the organization of the church we can look at the following clues of the May 15 to 30, 1829 ordination window in order of progressively narrowed parameters:

  1. Year 1829: There is a manuscript in Oliver Cowdery’s handwriting recording part of D&C 18: saying, "Written in the year of our Lord & Saviour 1829." [1]
  2. June 1829: In D&C 18:9 we read "And now, Oliver Cowdery, I speak unto you, and also unto David Whitmer, by the way of commandment; for, behold, I command all men everywhere to repent, and I speak unto you, even as unto Paul mine apostle, for you are called even with that same calling with which he was called."
  3. Before June 14, 1829: Oliver Cowdery wrote a letter to Hyrum Smith. The letter has some wording that quotes and refers to section 18 in the D&C. [2]
  4. Before June 1, 1829:
  5. Joseph Smith said that he, Emma, Oliver and David Whitmer traveled to the home of Peter Whitmer Sr. "In the beginning of the month of June." [3]
  6. David Whitmer is quoted as saying "The translation at my father’s farm, Fayette Township, Seneca County, New York occupied about one month, that is from June 1, to July 1, 1829." [4] If those dates are exact then the Prophet was in New York during the entire month of June.
  7. Orson Pratt asked David Whitmer, "Can you tell the date of the bestowal of the Apostleship upon Joseph, by Peter, James and John?" To which he replied: "I do not know, Joseph never told me." From this we can tell that the visitation either:
    1. Happened during the traveling when Joseph and Oliver were away from David and did not tell him about the occurrence (their trusted friend with whom they shared many other events).
    2. Happened at another time than their travel from Harmony to Fayette.

Why did several years pass before Oliver Cowdery talked about the priesthood restoration?

We don't know when Oliver first mentioned the priesthood restoration to anyone - we only know when he first put it in print

It should first be noted that many critics ignore versus in the Book of Mormon that refer explicitly to the priesthood:

  • Alma 4:20 - Alma was "confined [to the] high priesthood of the holy order of God..."
  • Alma 5:3 - Alma the younger is consecrated to be a high priest over the church of God by his father, Alma, who had power and authority from God to ordain.
  • Alma 13 - an explication of the power and function of the High Priesthood of Melchizedek.
  • Mosiah 18:17 - only those baptized by the "power and authority of God" are added to the Church
  • 3 Nephi 11:25; 12:1 - the 12 Nephite apostles receive power and authority to baptize

These are the earliest printed mentions of the priesthood. We don't know when Oliver first mentioned the priesthood restoration to anyone - we only know when he first put it in print. But consider this: If Oliver was covering up a fraud on the part of Joseph Smith when he talked of receiving the Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthoods, then why didn't he expose the fraud after he fell into disagreement with Joseph Smith and was excommunicated from the Church? Why, in fact, did Oliver continue to insist that the events related to the restoration of the Priesthood actually happened?

The implication is that Oliver was dishonest, yet his associates during the time that he was a lawyer after leaving the Church viewed his character as "irreproachable". Harvey Gibson, a political opponent of Oliver's, and another lawyer (whose statue now stands in front of the Seneca County courthouse) wrote:

Cowdery was an able lawyer and [an] agreeable, irreproachable gentleman. [5]

Webster's 1828 dictionary defines "irreproachable" as "That cannot be justly reproached; free from blame; upright; innocent. An irreproachable life is the highest honor of a rational being." [6]

Oliver wrote the following to Phineas Young two years after Joseph's death, well after he had left the Church:

I have cherished a hope, and that one of my fondest, that I might leave such a character, as those who might believe in my testimony, after I should be called hence, might do so, not only for the sake of the truth, but might not blush for the private character of the man who bore that testimony. I have been sensitive on this subject, I admit; but I ought to be so—you would be, under the circumstances, had you stood in the presence of John, with our departed Brother Joseph, to receive the Lesser Priesthood—and in the presence of Peter, to receive the Greater, and looked down through time, and witnessed the effects these two must produce,—you would feel what you have never felt, were wicked men conspiring to lessen the effects of your testimony on man, after you should have gone to your long sought rest. [7]

Painesville Telegraph (1830): "Cowdry claims that he and his associates are the only persons on earth who are qualified to administer in his name. By this authority, they proclaim to the world"

Painesville Telegraph, 7 December 1830:

Mr. Oliver Cowdry has his commission directly from the God of Heaven, and that he has credentials, written and signed by the hand of Jesus Christ, with whom he has personally conversed, and as such, said Cowdry claims that he and his associates are the only persons on earth who are qualified to administer in his name. By this authority, they proclaim to the world, that all who do not believe their testimony, and be baptized by them for the remission of sins . . . must be forever miserable.[8]

Painesville Telegraph (1830): "The name of the person here, who pretends to have a divine mission, and to have seen and conversed with Angels, is Cowdray"

Painesville Telegraph, 16 November 1830:

About Two weeks since some persons came along here with the book, one of whom pretends to have seen Angels, and assisted in translating the plates. He proclaims the destruction upon the world within a few years,--holds forth that the ordinances of the gospel, have not been regularly administered since the days of the Apostles, till the said Smith and himself commenced the work . . . . The name of the person here, who pretends to have a divine mission, and to have seen and conversed with Angels, is Cowdray."[9]

The Palmyra Reflector (1831): "Jo Smith had now received a commission from God...Cowdery and his friends had frequent interviews with angels"

The Palmyra Reflector, February 14, 1831:

They then proclaimed that there had been no religion in the world for 1500 years,--that no one had been authorized to preach &c. for that period—that Jo Smith had now received a commission from God for that purpose . . . . Smith (they affirmed) had seen God frequently and personally—Cowdery and his friends had frequent interviews with angels.[10]

Reverend Taggart (1833): "Joe Smith...told them he had seen Jesus Christ and the Apostles and conversed with them, and that he could perform miracles"

Reverend Richmond Taggart to Reverend Jonathan Goings, Cleveland, Ohio, March 2, 1833:

The following Curious occurrence occurred last week in Newburg about 6 miles from this Place [Cleveland, Ohio]. Joe Smith the great Mormonosity was there and held forth, and among other things he told them he had seen Jesus Christ and the Apostles and conversed with them, and that he could perform miracles.[11]

See FAIR Evidence:
More evidence related to the restoration of the priesthood


Source(s) of the criticism
Critical sources

Notes

  1. Oliver Cowdery, "Written in the year of our Lord & Savior 1829—A true copy of the articles of the Church of Christ," MS 1829, Church Archives.
  2. Letter of Oliver Cowdery to Hyrum Smith, 14 June 1829, Fayette, New York, Church Archives.
  3. Joseph Smith, History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 7 volumes, edited by Brigham H. Roberts, (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1957), 1:48–49. Volume 1 link; Papers of Joseph Smith, 1:293.
  4. Kansas City Daily Journal, 5 June 1881.
  5. "Letter from General W. H. Gibson," Seneca Advertiser (Tiffin, Ohio) 12 April 1892.
  6. Webster's Dictionary, off-site
  7. Oliver Cowdery to Phineas Young, 23 March 1846, Oliver Cowdery Collection, "Scriptory Book of Joseph Smith Jr." (kept by George W. Robinson), 22, Church Historical Department (published in Scott H. Faulring, ed, An American Prophet's Record.— The Diaries and Journals of Joseph Smith (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1989), emphasis in original; cited in Scott H. Faulring. "The Return of Oliver Cowdery", FARMS Featured Paper, no date.
  8. Painesville Telegraph, 7 December 1830
  9. The Golden Bible,” Painesville Telegraph (Ohio) (16 November 1830).
  10. The Palmyra Reflector, February 14, 1831.
  11. Reverend Richmond Taggart to Reverend Jonathan Goings, Cleveland, Ohio, March 2, 1833.


Notes