|
|
| (25 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
| + | #REDIRECT [[Joseph Smith/Legal issues]] |
| − | {{Resource Title|Joseph Smith legal issues: Trials}}
| |
| − | {{JosephSmithPortal}}
| |
| − | {{Summary}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | == ==
| |
| − | {{Topics label}}
| |
| − | {{SummaryItem
| |
| − | |link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials/1826 glasslooking trial
| |
| − | |subject=1826 trial for "glasslooking"
| |
| − | |summary=Joseph Smith was brought to trial in 1826 for "glasslooking." Didn't Hugh Nibley claim that if this trial record existed that it would be "the most damning evidence in existence against Joseph Smith?"
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{SummaryItem2
| |
| − | |link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials/1826 glasslooking trial/Con man
| |
| − | |subject=Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"?
| |
| − | |summary=Critics claim that Joseph was a "con man," and that he was found guilty of being such in a court of law. This refers to the 1826 trial.
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | | |
| − | {{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
| |
