View source for Question: Would an Israelite use Egyptian?

{{Main Page}}
<onlyinclude>
==Question: Would an Israelite use Egyptian?==
{{BMCentral|title=Did Ancient Israelites Write in Egyptian? |url=https://knowhy.bookofmormoncentral.org/knowhy/did-ancient-israelites-write-in-egyptian|number=4}}
===By the ninth to sixth centuries before Christ, Israelites used Egyptian numerals mingled with Hebrew text===
[[Image:180px-Egyptian_hieroglyphs_Black_Schist_sarcophagus_Ankhnesneferibre.jpg|frame|right|'''Hieroglyphics''': Hieroglyphs from the Black Schist sarcophagus of Ankhnesneferibre. Twenty-Sixth Dynasty, about 530 BC, Thebes.{{link|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_language}}]]

[[Image:180px-Prisse_papyrus.jpg|frame|right|'''Hieratic''': A section of the Prisse papyrus from the Bibliothèque nationale de France, containing the ''Precepts of Kakemna'' and the ''Precepts of Ptahhotep'' in hieratic.  [http://www.fairwiki.org/wiki/index.php/Image:800px-Prisse_papyrus.jpg Enlarge]  ''Source'': Plate IV. ''The S.S. Teacher's Edition: The Holy Bible'', (New York: Henry Frowde, Publisher to the University of Oxford, 1896).{{link|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hieratic}}]]

[[Image:180px-DemoticScriptsRosettaStoneReplica.jpg|frame|right|'''Demotic''': Inscription from the Rosetta Stone in demotic.{{link|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_language}}]]

The claim that Israelites would not use Egyptian is clearly false.  By the ninth to sixth centuries before Christ, Israelites used Egyptian numerals mingled with Hebrew text.  The ''Papyrus Amherst'' 63 contains a text of Psalms 20:2-6 written in Aramaic (the language of Jesus) using Egyptian characters.  This text was originally dated to the second century B.C., but this has since been extended to the 4th century B.C.<ref>John Gee and John A. Tvedtnes, "Ancient Manuscripts Fit Book of Mormon Pattern," ''Insights'' 19:2 (February 1999): 4&ndash;5.{{link|url=http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=insights&id=58}}</ref>

<blockquote>
More significant, however, was an ostracon uncovered at Arad in 1967.  Dating "toward the end of the seventh century B.C.," it reflects usage from shortly before 600 B.C., the time of Lehi. The text on the ostracon is written in a combination of Egyptian hieratic and Hebrew characters, but can be read entirely as Egyptian. Of the seventeen words in the text, ten are written in [Egyptian] hieratic and seven in Hebrew. However, all the words written in Hebrew can be read as Egyptian words, while one of them, which occurs twice, has the same meaning in both Egyptian and Hebrew.19 Of the ten words written in hieratic script, four are numerals (one occurring in each line).20 One symbol, denoting a measure of capacity, occurs four times (once in each of the four lines), and the remaining Egyptian word occurs twice. Thus, while seventeen words appear on the ostracon, if one discounts the recurrence of words, only six words are written in hieratic (of which four are numerals), and six in Hebrew.<ref>{{JBMS-5-2-7}}</ref>
</blockquote>

Anti-Mormon authors Ankerberg and Weldon claim:

<blockquote>
Mormonism has never explained how godly Jews [sic] of A.D. 400 allegedly knew Egyptian, nor why they would have written their sacred records entirely in the language of their pagan, idolatrous enemies" (p. 284). "How likely is it that the allegedly Jewish [sic] Nephites would have used the Egyptian language to write their sacred scriptures? Their strong antipathy to the Egyptians and their culture makes this difficult to accept. When modern Jews copy their scripture, they use Hebrew. They do not use Egyptian or Arabic, the language of their historic enemies" (pp. 294-95). "[N]o such language [as reformed Egyptian] exists and Egyptologists declare this unequivocally.<ref>{{FR-5-1-2}}</ref>
</blockquote>

They are, however, spectacularly wrong, and "Mormonism" has explained why repeatedly:

<blockquote>
The statement "When modern Jews copy their scripture, they use Hebrew. They do not use Egyptian or Arabic, the language of their historic enemies" is quite an astonishing display of ignorance. Since the Egyptian language has been dead for centuries, it is hardly remarkable that modern Jews do not read the Bible in Egyptian. On the other hand, "the first and most important rendering [of the Old Testament] from Hebrew [into Arabic] was made by Sa'adya the Ga'on, a learned Jew who was head of the rabbinic school at Sura in Babylon (died 942)" (George A. Buttrick, ed., ''The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible'' [hereafter ''IDB''], 4 vols. and supplement [Nashville: Abingdon, 1962&ndash;1976], 4:758b). Thus, Jews have indeed translated the Bible into "Arabic, the language of their historic enemies." They also have translated it into the language of their "historic enemies" the Greeks (''IDB'' 4:750b on the Septuagint) and Aramaeans (''IDB'' 1:185-93; 4:749-50, on the Aramaic Targums).<ref>Ankerberg and Weldon, 294.</ref>
</blockquote>
There was a clear evolution of Egyptian script in the Old World, and these modified scripts were in use in Lehi's day.  People of Lehi's time and place did use both Hebrew and Egyptian, just as Nephi claimed (See [http://scriptures.lds.org/1_ne/1/2#2 1 Nephi 1:2]).
</onlyinclude>
{{endnotes sources}}

<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[Category:The Changing World of Mormonism]]

[[pt:Pergunta: Será que um israelita usar egípcio?]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Es posible que un israelita usara el egipcio?]]
[[Category:Questions]]